Deception detection: dependable or defective?

• BBC (2009) ‘Visions Link’ to coffee intake. BBC News. Retrieved 10.07.2013 from http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/7827761.stm

• Buller DB, Burgoon JK (1996) Interpersonal deception theory. Commun Theory 6:203–242

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Burgoon JK, Qin T (2006) The dynamic nature of deceptive verbal communication. J Lang Soc Psychol 25(1):76–96

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Burgoon JK, Blair JP, Qin T, Nunamaker JF Jr (2003) Detecting deception through linguistic analysis. In: Proceedings of first NSF/NIJ symposium on intelligence and security informatics (ISI), Tucson, pp 91–101

• Camden C, Motley MM, Wilson A (1984) White lies in interpersonal communication: a taxonomy and preliminary investigation of social motivations. West J Speech Commun 48:309–325

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Church K, Hanks P (1991) Word association norms, mutual information and lexicography. J Comput Linguist 16(1):22–29

  Google Scholar 

• Clough P, Stevenson M (2010) Developing a corpus of plagiarised short answers. J Lang Resour Eval 45(1):5–24

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cody MJ, Marston PJ, Foster M (1984) Deception: paralinguistic and verbal leakage. In: Bostrom RN, Westley BH (eds) Communication Yearbook 8. Sage, Beverly Hills, pp 464–490

  Google Scholar 

• DePaulo BM, Kashy DA, Kirkendol SE, Wyer MM, Epstein JA (1996) Lying in everyday life. J Pers Soc Psychol 70:979–995

  Article  Google Scholar 

• DePaulo BM, Lindsay JJ, Malone BE, Muhlenbruck L, Charlton K, Cooper H (2003) Cues to deception. Psychol Bull 129(1):74–118

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Dossier D (2013). Wikipedia: The Free Encyclopaedia. Wikimedia Foundation Inc. Encyclopaedia on-line. Retrieved 10/07/2013 from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_Dossier

• Doyen S, Klein O, Pichon CL, Cleeremans A (2012) Behavioral priming: it’s all in the mind, but whose mind? PLoS One 7(1): e29081. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0029081

• Eissen SM zu, Stein B (2006) Intrinsic plagiarism detection. In: Advances in information retrieval, Lecture notes in computer science, vol 3936, pp 565–569

• Ekman P (1985) Telling lies, clues to deceit in the marketplace, politics, and marriage. W.W. Norton & Company, New York

  Google Scholar 

• Erat S, Gneezy U (2009) White Lies, Rady Working paper, Rady School of Management, University of California, San Diego

• Pennebaker JW, Francis, ME, Booth RJ (2001) Linguistic inquiry and word count (LIWC). Erlbaum Publishers

• Franke RC, Kaul JD (1978) The Hawthorne experiments: first statistical interpretation. Am Sociol Rev 43(5):623–643

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Gipp B, Meuschke N, Beel J (2011) Comparative evaluation of text-and citation-based plagiarism detection approaches using GuttenPlag. In: Proceedings of 11th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on digital libraries (JCDL’11), pp 225–258

• Gray WS, Leary BE (1935) What Makes a Book Readable. Chicago University Press, Chicago

• Gupta S, Skillicorn D (2006) Improving a textual deception detection model. In: Proceedings of the 2006 conference of the center for advanced studies on collaborative research, Toronto, pp 1–4

• Gupta S, Skillicorn D (2006) Improving a textual deception detection model. In: Proceedings of the 2006 conference of the center for advanced studies on collaborative research, Canada, pp 1–4

• Hall HV, Pritchard DA (1996) Detecting Malingering and Deception. Forensic Distortion Analysis (FDA). St. Lucie Press, Boca Raton

• Hample D (1980) Purposes and effects of lying. South Speech Commun J 46:33–47

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hancock JT, Curry L, Goorha S, Woodworth MT (2004) Lies in conversation: an examination of deception using automated linguistic analysis. In: Proceedings of annual conference of the cognitive science society, 26, pp 534–540

• Hancock JT, Thom-Santelli J, Ritchie T (2004) Deception and design: the impact of communication technology on lying behaviour. In: Proceedings of the conference on human factors in computing systems (ACM SIGCHI), pp 129–134

• Hancock JT, Curry L, Goorha S, Woodworth MT (2005) Automated linguistic analysis of deceptive and truthful synchronous computer-mediated communication. In: Proceedings of the 38th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS-38), IEEE Press, Los Alamitos

• Hancock JT, Birnholtz J, Bazarova N, Guillory J, Amos B, Perlin J (2009) Butler lies: awareness, deception and design. In: Proceedings of the ACM conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI 09), Boston, pp 517–526

• Inches G, Crestani F (2012) Overview of the international sexual predator identification competition at PAN-2012. In: Proceedings of the 6th PAN workshop at CLEF2012 on uncovering plagiarism, authorship, and social software misuse (PAN2012), Rome

• Jones SR (1992) Was there a Hawthorne effect? Am J Sociol 98(3):451–468

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Keila PS, Skillicorn DB (2005a) Detecting unusual and deceptive communication in email. In: Proceedings of the 2005 conference of the centre for advanced studies on collaborative research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, IBM Press

• Keila PS, Skillicorn DB (2005b) Structure in the Enron email dataset. Comput Math Organ Theory 11(3):183–199

  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Keila PS, Skillicorn DB (2005b) Detecting unusual email communication. In: Proceedings of the 2005 conference of the centre for advanced studies on collaborative research, pp 117–125

• Knapp ML, Hart RP, Dennis HS (1974) An exploration of deception as a communication construct. Human Commun Res 1:15–29

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Left S (2002) Casting the Net for Paedophiles. Guardian Unlimited. Retrieved 10.07.2013 from http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2002/apr/24/internetnews.childprotection1

• Lindskold S, Walters PS (1983) Categories for acceptability of lies. J Soc Psychol 120:129–136

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Little A, Skillicorn B (2008) Detecting deception in testimony. In: Proceeding of IEEE international conference of intelligence and security informatics (ISI 2008), Taipei, pp 13–18

• Mahon JE (2007) A definition of deceiving. Int J Appl Philos 21:181–194

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Mahon JE (2008) Two definitions of lying. Int J Appl Philos 22(2):211–230

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Masip J, Garrido E, Herrero C (2004) Defining deception. Anales de Psicologia 20(1):147–171

  Google Scholar 

• Maurer H, Kappe F, Zaka B (2006) Plagiarism: a survey. J Univ Comput Sci 12(8):1050–1084

  Google Scholar 

• Miller GR, Stiff JB (1993) Deceptive communication. Sage, Newbury Park

  Google Scholar 

• Mosteller F, Wallace DL (1964) Inference and disputed authorship: the federalist. Addison Wesley

• Newbold N, Gillam L (2010) The linguistics of readability: the next step for word. In: Processing. Workshop on computational linguistics and writing: writing processes and authoring aids (CLandW 2010), Los Angles, pp 65–72

• Newman ML, Pennebaker JW, Berry DS, Richards JM (2003) Lying words: predicting deception from linguistic styles. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 29(5):665–675

  Article  Google Scholar 

• PAN (2012) In: 6th PAN workshop at CLEF2012 on uncovering plagiarism, authorship, and social software misuse (PAN2012), Rome

• PAN (2013) In: 7th PAN workshop at CLEF2013 on uncovering plagiarism, authorship, and social software misuse (PAN2013), Valencia

• Pennebaker JW, Mehl M, Niederhoffer K (2003) Psychological aspects of natural language use: our words, our selves. Annu Rev Psychol 54(1):547–577

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Qin T, Burgoon JK, Nunamaker JF Jr (2004) An exploratory study on promising cues in deception detection and application of decision trees. In: Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii international conference on system sciences, Waikoloa, pp 23–32

• Qin T, Burgoon JK, Blair JP, Nunamaker JF (2005) Modality effects in deception detection and applications in automatic-deception-detection. In: Proceedings of the 38th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences, pp 1–10

• Robin Sage (2013). Wikipedia: The Free Encyclopaedia. Wikimedia Foundation Inc. Encyclopaedia on-line. Retrieved 10/07/2013 from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robin_Sage

• Russow LM (1986) Deception: a philosophical perspective. In: Mitchell RW, Thompson NS (eds) Deception: perspective on human and nonhuman deceit. State University of New York Press, Albany, pp 41–52

  Google Scholar 

• Seaward L, Matwin S (2009) Intrinsic plagiarism detection using complexity analysis. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on uncovering plagiarism, authorship, and social software misuse (PAN09), pp 56–61

• Stamatatos E (2009) Intrinsic plagiarism detection using character n-gram profiles. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on uncovering plagiarism, authorship, and social software misuse (PAN09), pp 38–46

• Stein B, Koppel M, Stamatatos E (2007) Plagiarism analysis, authorship identification, and near-duplicate detection PAN’07. ACM SIGIR Forum pp 68–71

• Stein B, Lipka N, Prettenhofer P (2010) Intrinsic plagiarism analysis. Lang Resour Eval 45(1):63–82

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Toma CL, Hancock JT (2010) Reading between the lines: linguistic cues to deception in online dating profiles. In: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW 2010), Savannah, pp 5–8

• Vartapetiance A, Gillam L (2012) I don’t know where he’s not’: does deception research yet offer a basis for deception detectives? In: Proceeding of EACL 2012 workshop on computational approaches to deception detection, Avignon, pp 5–15

• Vartapetiance A, Gillam L (2012) Quite simple approaches for authorship attribution, intrinsic plagiarism detection and sexual predator identification. In: Proceedings of the 6th PAN workshop at CLEF2012 on uncovering plagiarism, authorship, and social software misuse (PAN2012), Rome

• Vijayan J (2010) Fake femme fatale shows social network risks. Computerworld Magazine. Retrieved 10.07.2013 from http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9179507/Fake_i_femme_fatale_i_shows_social_network_risks

• Vrij A (2000) Detecting lies and deceit: the psychology of lying and its implications for professional practice. Wiley, Chichester

  Google Scholar 

• Vrij A, Mann S (2004) Detecting deception: the benefit of looking at a combination of behavioral, auditory and speech content related cues in a systematic manner. Group Decision and Negotiation (special deception issue) 13:61–79

  Google Scholar 

• Vrij A, Edward K, Bull R (2001) Stereotypical verbal and nonverbal responses while deceiving others. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 27:899–909

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Walker D (2004) I’m a celebrity, get me a ghost writer. BBC News. Retrieved 10.07.2013 from http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/3757275.stm

• Zhou L, Burgoon JK, Twitchell DP (2003) A longitudinal analysis of language behavior of deception in E-mail. In: Proceedings of Intelligence and Security Informatics, 2665, pp 102–110

• Zhou L, Twitchell DP, Tiantian Q, Burgoon JK, Nunamaker JF Jr (2003) An exploratory study into deception detection in text-based computer-mediated communication. In: Proceedings of the 36th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences, Waikoloa, pp 10–19

• Zhou L, Burgoon JK, Zhang D, Nunamaker JF Jr (2004) Language dominance in interpersonal deception in computer-mediated communication. Comput Hum Behav 20(3):381–402

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Zuckerman M, DePaulo BM, Rosenthal R (1981) Verbal and nonverbal communication of deception. In: Berkowitz L (ed) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 14:1–59

Download references