[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Early prediction of promising expert users on community question answering sites

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Community question answering (CQA) sites have become a popular medium for exchanging knowledge with other members of the community. Users can publish questions, answers, and comments on these sites. Furthermore, users of the CQA sites are able to express their thoughts on a post by voting positively or negatively. People anticipate rapid and high-quality answers from these CQA sites, which are often provided by a small group of users known as experts. A large number of queries remain unanswered on these forums, emphasising the scarcity of experts. To address this problem, we presented a methodology for predicting promising expert users for CQA sites. Promising experts are individuals that have just joined the community and have shown glimpses of producing high-quality content to the site. The suggested method looks at the first month of a user’s postings to determine whether or not the individual is a promising expert. The experimental findings revealed that the suggested approach accurately predicts future experts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. https://archive.org/details/stackexchange.

  2. https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/sgd.html.

References

  • Adamic LA, Zhang J, Bakshy E, Ackerman MS (2008) Knowledge sharing and Yahoo! answers: everyone knows something. In: Proceedings of the 17th international conference on World Wide Web, ACM, pp 665–674

  • Agichtein E, Castillo C, Donato D, Gionis A, Mishne G (2008) Finding high-quality content in social media. In: Proceedings of the 2008 international conference on web search and data mining, ACM, pp 183–194

  • Al-Taie MZ, Kadry S, Obasa AI (2018) Understanding expert finding systems: domains and techniques. Soc Netw Anal Min 8(1):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bian J, Liu Y, Zhou D, Agichtein E, Zha H (2009) Learning to recognize reliable users and content in social media with coupled mutual reinforcement. In: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on World wide web, ACM, pp 51–60

  • Blooma MJ, Kurian JC (2011) Research issues in community based question answering. In: PACIS, p 29

  • Bottou L (2010) Large-scale machine learning with stochastic gradient descent. In: Proceedings of COMPSTAT’2010, Springer, pp 177–186

  • Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Mach Learn 45(1):5–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chawla NV, Bowyer KW, Hall LO, Kegelmeyer WP (2002) Smote: synthetic minority over-sampling technique. J Artif Intell Res 16:321–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis J, Goadrich M (2006) The relationship between precision-recall and roc curves. In: Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on machine learning, ACM, ICML ’06, pp 233–240, https://doi.org/10.1145/1143844.1143874

  • Davoodi E, Kianmehr K, Afsharchi M (2013) A semantic social network-based expert recommender system. Appl Intell 39(1):1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehghan M, Abin AA, Neshati M (2020) An improvement in the quality of expert finding in community question answering networks. Decis Support Syst 139:113425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman JH (2001) Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine. Ann Stat 29:1189–1232

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Fu J, Li Y, Zhang Q, Wu Q, Ma R, Huang X, Jiang YG (2020) Recurrent memory reasoning network for expert finding in community question answering. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, pp 187–195

  • Ghasemi N, Fatourechi R, Momtazi S (2021) User embedding for expert finding in community question answering. ACM Trans Knowl Discov Data (TKDD) 15(4):1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hashemi SH, Neshati M, Beigy H (2013) Expertise retrieval in bibliographic network: a topic dominance learning approach. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM international conference on Conference on information & knowledge management, ACM, pp 1117–1126

  • Huang C, Yao L, Wang X, Benatallah B, Zhang X (2020) Software expert discovery via knowledge domain embeddings in a collaborative network. Pattern Recogn Lett 130:46–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kichou S, Boussaid O, Meziane A (2020) Tag’s depth-based expert profiling using a topic modeling technique. Int J Semantic Web Inf Syst (IJSWIS) 16(4):81–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kundu D, Mandal DP (2019) Formulation of a hybrid expertise retrieval system in community question answering services. Appl Intell 49(2):463–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li H, Jin S, Shudong L (2015) A hybrid model for experts finding in community question answering. In: Cyber-enabled distributed computing and knowledge discovery (CyberC), 2015 International Conference on, IEEE, pp 176–185

  • Liu DR, Chen YH, Kao WC, Wang HW (2013) Integrating expert profile, reputation and link analysis for expert finding in question-answering websites. Inf Process Manag 49(1):312–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Movshovitz-Attias D, Movshovitz-Attias Y, Steenkiste P, Faloutsos C (2013) Analysis of the reputation system and user contributions on a question answering website: Stackoverflow. In: Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE/ACM international conference on advances in social networks analysis and mining, ACM, pp 886–893

  • Nasrabadi NM (2007) Pattern recognition and machine learning. J Electron Imaging 16(4):049901

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Neshati M, Hashemi SH, Beigy H (2014) Expertise finding in bibliographic network: topic dominance learning approach. IEEE Trans Cybern 44(12):2646–2657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neshati M, Hiemstra D, Asgari E, Beigy H (2014) Integration of scientific and social networks. World Wide Web 17(5):1051–1079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nobari AD, Neshati M, Gharebagh SS (2020) Quality-aware skill translation models for expert finding on Stackoverflow. Inf Syst 87:101413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Page L, Brin S, Motwani R, Winograd T (1999) The pagerank citation ranking: bringing order to the web. Tech. rep., Stanford Univeristy

  • Pal A (2015) Metrics and algorithms for routing questions to user communities. ACM Trans Inf Syst (TOIS) 33(3):14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pal A, Konstan JA (2010) Expert identification in community question answering: exploring question selection bias. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management, ACM, pp 1505–1508

  • Pal A, Farzan R, Konstan J, Kraut R (2011) Early detection of potential experts in question answering communities. User Modeling, Adaption and Personalization pp 231–242

  • Pal A, Harper FM, Konstan JA (2012) Exploring question selection bias to identify experts and potential experts in community question answering. ACM Trans Inf Syst 30(2):10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pal A, Herdagdelen A, Chatterji S, Taank S, Chakrabarti D (2016) Discovery of topical authorities in Instagram. In: Proceedings of the 25th international conference on world wide web, international world wide web conferences steering committee, pp 1203–1213

  • Patil S, Lee K (2016) Detecting experts on Quora: by their activity, quality of answers, linguistic characteristics and temporal behaviors. Soc Netw Anal Min 6(1):5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rampisela TV, Yulianti E (2020) Academic expert finding in Indonesia using word embedding and document embedding: a case study of Fasilkom UI. In: 2020 8th international conference on information and communication technology (ICoICT), IEEE, pp 1–6

  • Rish I (2001) An empirical study of the naive Bayes classifier. In: IJCAI 2001 workshop on empirical methods in artificial intelligence, IBM, vol 3(22), pp 41–46

  • Roy PK, Singh JP (2018) A tag2vec approach for questions tag suggestion on community question answering sites. In: International conference on machine learning and data mining in pattern recognition, Springer, pp 168–182

  • Roy PK, Singh JP (2020) Predicting closed questions on community question answering sites using convolutional neural network. Neural Comput Appl 32:10555–10572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy PK, Ahmad Z, Singh JP, Alryalat MAA, Rana NP, Dwivedi YK (2018) Finding and ranking high-quality answers in community question answering sites. Glob J Flex Syst Manag 19(1):53–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy PK, Singh JP, Baabdullah AM, Kizgin H, Rana NP (2018) Identifying reputation collectors in community question answering CQA sites: exploring the dark side of social media. Int J Inf Manage 42:25–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy PK, Singh JP, Nag A (2018c) Finding active expert users for question routing in community question answering sites. In: International conference on machine learning and data mining in pattern recognition, Springer, pp 440–451

  • Saumya S, Singh JP, Baabdullah AM, Rana NP, Dwivedi YK (2018) Ranking online consumer reviews. Electron Commer Res Appl 29:78–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tagarelli A, Interdonato R (2015) Time-aware analysis and ranking of lurkers in social networks. Soc Netw Anal Min 5(1):46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk D, Tsagkias M, de Rijke M (2015) Early detection of topical expertise in community question answering. In: Proceedings of the 38th International ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval, ACM, pp 995–998

  • Wang X, Huang C, Yao L, Benatallah B, Dong M (2018) A survey on expert recommendation in community question answering. J Comput Sci Technol 33(4):625–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang J, Tao K, Bozzon A, Houben GJ (2014) Sparrows and owls: Characterisation of expert behaviour in stackoverflow. In: International conference on user modeling, adaptation, and personalization, Springer, pp 266–277

  • Zhang J, Ackerman MS, Adamic L (2007) Expertise networks in online communities: structure and algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web, ACM, pp 221–230

  • Ziaimatin H, Groza T, Bordea G, Buitelaar P, Hunter J (2014) Expertise profiling in evolving knowledge curation platforms. GSTF J Comput (JoC) 2(3):118

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pradeep Kumar Roy.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There is no Conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Roy, P.K., Singh, J.P. Early prediction of promising expert users on community question answering sites. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 15, 2902–2913 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-024-02303-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-024-02303-0

Keywords

Navigation