[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Neural Agent (Neugent) Models of Driver Behavior for Supporting ITS Simulations

  • Published:
International Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents an agent-based neuro-fuzzy approach for modeling drivers’ compliance with travel advice under the influence of real-time traffic information. Fuzzy logic is combined with neural networks to capture the variability of drivers’ appraisal of the different route attributes as well as the variability in their perceptions of the various attribute levels. The accuracy of the models, in terms of predicting the categories of drivers likely to comply with traffic advice, was found to exceed 90%. A comparative evaluation with discrete choice models showed higher accuracies ranging between (91 and 96) percent compared to (50–73) percent for the binary choice models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. U.S. Department of Transportation. Intelligent Transport Systems Benefits, Costs and Lessons Learned. http://www.benefitcost.its.dot.gov, Accessed 30–12-2009 (2009)

  2. Hawas, Y.E.: Development and calibration of route choice utility model: factorial experimental design approach. Transp. Eng ASCE 130(2), 159–170 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Hawas, Y.E.: Development and calibration of route choice utility models: neuro-fuzzy approach. J. Transp. Eng ASCE 130(2), 171–182 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Kuri, I., Pursula, M.: Modeling Car Route Choice with Non-Dynamic Stated Preference Data: A Comparison Between Fuzzy Similarity and Random Utility Models, Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC (2001)

  5. Henn, V.: Fuzzy route choice model for traffic assignment. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 116, 77–101 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Teodorovic, D., Vukanovic, S., Obradovic, K.: Modeling route choice with advanced traveler information by fuzzy logic. Transp. Plann. Technol. 22(1), 1–25 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen, T.-Y., Chang, H.-L., Tzeng, G.-H.: Using a weight-assessing model to identify route choice criteria and information effects. Transp. Res. A Policy Pract. 35, 197–224 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen, W.-H., Jovanis, P.P.: Analysis of driver en-route guidance compliance and driver learning with ATIS using a travel simulation experiment. Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, January 2003, Washington DC (2003)

  9. Dia, H.: An agent-based approach to modelling driver route choice behaviour under the influence of real-time information. Transp. Res. C Emerg. Technol. 10, 331–349 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Shoham, Y.: Agent-oriented programming. Artif. Intell. 60(1), 51–92 (1993)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Thomas, S.R. PLACA, Agent Oriented Programming Language, Stanford University (1993)

  12. Peeta, S., Yu, J.W.: Adaptability of a hybrid route choice model to incorporating driver behavior dynamics under information provision. IEEE Transections Syst. Man Ctbernetics A Syst. Hum. 4(2), 243–256 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Khattak, A., Polydoropoulou, A., Ben-Akiva, M.: Modeling revealed and stated pretrip travel response to advanced traveler information systems. Transp. Res. Rec. 46–54 (1996)

  14. Dia, H., Panwai, S.: Modelling drivers’ compliance and route choice behaviour in response to travel information. Special issue on Modelling and Control of Intelligent Transportation Systems. J. Nonlinear Dyn. 49(40), 493–509 (2007). Springer

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Dia, H.: An object-oriented neural network approach to short-term traffic forecasting. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 131, 253–261 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Furusawa, H.: A study of route choice behaviour in response to content of variable message signs in Adelaide. University of SA, Adelaide (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hensher, D.A., Ton, T.T.: A comparison of the predictive potential of artificial neural networks and nested logit models for commuter mode choice. Transp. Res. E Logistics Transp. Rev. 36, 155–172 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Haykin, S.: Neural networks: A comprehensive foundation, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall, NJ (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Smith, L.: An Introduction to Neural Networks. http://www.cs.stir.ac.uk/~lss/NNIntro/InvSlides.html, Accessed 20-Jan-2010, (2003)

  20. Panwai, S., Dia, H.: Neural agent car-following models. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 8(1), 60–70 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhao, S., Muromachi, Y., Harata, K., Ohta, A.: SP model for route choice behavior in response to travel time information with marginal errors. Proceedings 7th World Conference Transport Research, Australia (1995)

  22. Lotan, T.: On effects of familiarity on route choice behaviour in response of information. Proceedings 7th World Conference on Transport Research, Australia (1995)

  23. Abdel-Aty, M., Kitamura, R., Jovanis, P.: Using stated preference data for studying the effect of advanced traffic information on drivers’ route choice. Transp. Res. C 5(1), 39–50 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wardman, M., Bonsall, P., Shires, J.: Driver response to variable message signs: a stated preference investigation. Transp. Res. C Emerg. Technol. 5(6, 1), 389–405 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bonsall, P., Firmin, P., Anderson, M., Palmer, I., Balmforth, P.: Validating the results of a route choice simulator. Transp. Res. C Emerg. Technol. 5(6), 371–387 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Peeta, S., Poonuru, K., Sinha, K.: Evaluation of mobility impacts of advanced information systems. J. Transp. Eng. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 126, 212–220 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Mizoue, S., Kakimoto, R., Shibaki, M.: Experimental analysis on dynamic route choice behavior under providing travel information. Traffic Eng. 35(3), 9–19 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lai, K-h, Wong, W-g: SP approach toward driver comprehension of message formats on VMS. J. Transp. Eng. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 126, 221–227 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Adler, J.L.: Investigating the learning effects of route guidance and traffic advisories on route choice behavior. Transp. Res. C Emerg. Technol. 9(1), 1–14 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hidas, P., Awadalla, E.: Investigation of route choice in response to variable message signs J. East. Asia Soc. Transp. Stud. (EASTS), Behavioral Analysis and Traffic Models 4(3):39–54. ISSN 1341-8521.

  31. Dia, H., Harney, D., Boyle, A.: Dynamics of drivers’ route choice decisions under advanced traveler information systems. Roads and Transport Research. Vol. 10, No. 4, ARRB Transport Research Ltd, Vermont South, Victoria, Australia. pp. 2–12 (2001)

  32. Dia, H., Rose, G.: Development and evaluation of neural network freeway incident detection models using field data. Transp. Res. C Emerg. Technol. 5, 313–331 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. NeuralWare: NeuralWorks professional II/PLUS: Getting started—a tutorial for microsoft windows computers. CARNEGIE, PA (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kohonen, T.: Self-organization and associative memory. Springer-Verlag, New York (1988)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Palacharla, P.V., Nelson, P.C.: Application of fuzzy logic and neural networks for dynamic travel time estimation. Int. Trans. Oper. Res. 6(1), 145–160 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Pedrycz, W.: Fuzzy neural networks and neurocomputations. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 56, 1–28 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Peeta, S., Yu, J.W.: A data-consistent fuzzy approach for on-line driver behavior under information provision. Transp. Res. Rec. 1803, 76–86 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. TSS: AIMSUN 6.1 Microsimulator user manual. Version 6.1. Transport Simulation Systems, Barcelona (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Panwai, S., Dia, H.: Comparative evaluation of microscopic car-following behavior. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 6(3), 314–325 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

At the time of undertaking this research, both authors were with the ITS Research Laboratory at the University of Queensland, Australia. The work reported in this paper was part of the second author’s PhD work. An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 10th Intelligent Transport Systems Asia-Pacific Forum, in Bangkok, Thailand (2009).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Hussein Dia or Sakda Panwai.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dia, H., Panwai, S. Neural Agent (Neugent) Models of Driver Behavior for Supporting ITS Simulations. Int. J. ITS Res. 9, 23–36 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13177-010-0022-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13177-010-0022-9

Keywords

Navigation