[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Experimental study on the three-dimensional wake structure of the DrivAer standard model

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Visualization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An automatic particle imaging velocimetry (Auto-PIV) measuring technique was developed based on the external triggering and automatic control technology. Measurements of the DrivAer model wake were performed using Auto-PIV in the spanwise and vertical direction. Three-dimensional time-averaged velocity distribution was reconstructed and the spatial distribution of the large coherent structures was described. The results indicate that regions with high velocity fluctuations mainly locate at the shear layer of the upper and lower edge of the recirculation bubble. Further proper orthogonal decomposition results show that the velocity fluctuations account for a very little proportion of kinetic energy compared with the time-averaged velocity, supporting that the DrivAer model has steady aerodynamic characteristics. The smooth outlines of the DrivAer notchback model can delay the flow separation on the top and the C-pillar of the model, which inhibits the formation of the back recirculation bubble at the rear window and reduces the size of the recirculation bubble behind the baggage compartment. These promote the pressure recovery at the rear of the DrivAer notchback model, and thus reduces the pressure drag. At the rear of the model, the airflow on both sides converges towards the center due to the pressure difference, producing the streamwise vorticity by shearing the baggage compartment, then separates at the rear of the baggage compartment and generates a pair of secondary vortices. Overall, the aerodynamic behavior of the DrivAer model is robust.

Graphic abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9.
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

\(A\)::

Longitudinal projection area of the DrivAer model.

\(\sqrt A\)::

Reference length.

\(D\)::

Width of the vehicle model.

\(d\)::

Space between the adjacent measurement planes.

\(E\)::

The energy ratios of the higher order POD modes.

\(H\)::

Height of the vehicle model.

\(L\)::

Length of the vehicle model.

\(N\)::

Total number of images taken at each measuring position.

\(n\)::

Current captured image number.

O : :

Origin of the right-handed Cartesian coordinate system.

\(Q\) :

Second invariant.

\({\varvec{r}}\)::

The eigenvector of the real eigenvalue of the velocity gradient tensor.

\({\varvec{R}}\)::

Rortex vector.

\({\varvec{R}}^{*}\)::

Nondimensionalized Rortex vector.

\(R_{x}^{*}\)::

Nondimensionalized streamwise component of the Rortex vector.

\(R_{y}^{*}\)::

Nondimensionalized spanwise component of the Rortex vector.

\(R_{z}^{*}\)::

Nondimensionalized vertical component of the Rortex vector.

\(Re\)::

Reynolds number based on the reference length.

\(S\)::

Total number of measuring positions.

\(s\)::

Current measuring position number.

\(U\)::

Time-averaged streamwise velocity component.

\(u\)::

Streamwise velocity fluctuation.

\(U_{0}\)::

Free-stream velocity.

\(U_{s}\)::

Time-averaged streamwise velocity component measured in the (x, z) plane.

\(U_{t}\)::

Time-averaged streamwise velocity component measured in the (x, y) plane.

\(V\)::

Time-averaged spanwise velocity component.

\(v\)::

Spanwise velocity fluctuation.

\(V_{t}\)::

Time-average spanwise velocity component measured in the (x, y) plane.

\(W\)::

Time-averaged vertical velocity component.

\(w\)::

Vertical velocity fluctuation.

\(W_{s}\)::

Time-averaged vertical velocity component measured in the (x, z) plane.

\(x\)::

Streamwise direction.

\(x^{*}\)::

Streamwise direction nondimensionalized by the reference length.

\(y\)::

Spanwise direction.

\(y^{*}\)::

Spanwise direction nondimensionalized by the reference length.

\(z\)::

Vertical direction.

\(z^{*}\)::

Vertical direction nondimensionalized by the reference length.

\(\overline{{uu}}_{n}\)::

Reynolds normal stress based on the first n samples.

\(\overline{{uv}}_{n}\)::

Reynolds shear stress based on the first n samples.

\(\overline{{uw}}_{n}\)::

Reynolds shear stress based on the first n samples.

\(\overline{uu}\)::

Reynolds normal stress based on N = 500 samples.

\(\overline{uv}\)::

Reynolds shear stress based on N = 500 samples.

\(\overline{uw}\)::

Reynolds shear stress based on N = 500 samples.

\(\eta\)::

Relative error of the Reynolds stresses.

\(\lambda {}_{2}\) :

Second eigenvalue of the pressure Hessian.

\(\lambda_{ci}\)::

The imaginary part of the complex eigenvalues of the velocity gradient tensor.

\(\mu\)::

Dynamic viscosity coefficient of air.

\(\rho\)::

Density of air.

\(\varphi\)::

Slant angle of the Ahmed body.

\(\omega\)::

Vorticity.

\(\omega_{x}^{*}\)::

Nondimensionalized vorticity in the streamwise direction.

\(\omega_{y}^{*}\)::

Nondimensionalized vorticity in the spanwise direction.

\(\omega_{z}^{*}\)::

Nondimensionalized vorticity in the vertical direction.

\(\Phi_{U}\)::

Dynamic modes in streamwise component.

\(\left\| {\Phi_{U} } \right\|\)::

Energy norm of dynamic mode in streamwise component

References

  • Ahmed SR, Ramm G, Faltin G (1984). Some salient features of the time-averaged ground vehicle wake. SAE Trans, 473–503.

  • Ashton N, Revell A (2015). Comparison of RANS and DES methods for the DrivAer automotive body. SAE Techn Pap: 2015–01–1538.

  • Azim AA (1994). An experimental study of the aerodynamic interference between road vehicles. SAE Technical Pap: 940422.

  • Beaudoin JF, Aider JL (2008) Drag and lift reduction of a 3D bluff body using flaps. Exp Fluids 44(4):491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benedict LH, Gould RD (1996) Towards better uncertainty estimates for turbulence statistics. Exp Fluids 22(2):129–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr G, Stapleford W (1986). Blockage effects in automotive wind-tunnel testing. SAE Techn Pap: 860093.

  • Chong MS, Perry AE, Cantwell BJ (1990) A general classification of three-dimensional flow fields. Phys Fluids A 2(5):765–777

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Cogotti A (1998). A parametric study on the ground effect of a simplified car model. SAE Trans, 180–204.

  • Dolci V, Arina R (2016) Proper orthogonal decomposition as surrogate model for aerodynamic optimization. Int J Aerosp Eng 2016:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grandemange M, Gohlke M, Cadot O (2013) Turbulent wake past a three-dimensional blunt body. Part 1. Global modes and bi-stability. J Fluid Mech 722:51–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guilmineau E (2014) Numerical simulations of flow around a realistic generic car model. SAE Int J Passeng Cars Mech Syst 7:646–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He GS, Li N, Wang JJ (2014) Drag reduction of square cylinders with cut-corners at the front edges. Exp Fluids 55:1745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heft A. (2011). Development of a new realistic generic car model for aero-dynamic investigations. 1 Tag der Ing der Fak fur Masch der TUM 2011, 6–7.

  • Heft A, Indinger T, Adams N (2011). Investigation of unsteady flow structures in the wake of a realistic generic car model. In: 29th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii, 2011. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, pp 1–14.

  • Heft A, Indinger T, Adams NA (2012). Experimental and numerical investigation of the DrivAer model. In: ASME 2012 Fluids engineering division summer meeting collocated with the ASME 2012 heat transfer summer conference and the ASME 2012 10th international conference on nanochannels, microchannels, and minichannels, Rio Grande, Puerto Rico, 8–12 July 2012. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, pp 41–51.

  • Howell J, Forbes D, Passmore M, Page G (2017) The effect of a sheared crosswind flow on car aerodynamics. SAE Int J Passeng Cars Mech Syst 10:278–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu Z, Liu J, Gan L, Xu S (2019) Wake modes behind a streamwisely oscillating cylinder at constant and ramping frequencies. J Vis 22:505–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hucho WH (2005). Aerodynamik des Automobils, VIEWEG, Auflage 5, ISBN: 3–528–03959–0.

  • Hucho W, Sovran G (1993) Aerodynamics of road vehicles. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 25:485–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt JCR, Wray A, Moin P (1988). Eddies, stream, and convergence zones in turbulent flows. Center for turbulence research report CTR-S88, 193–208.

  • Jakirlic S, Kutej L, Hanssmann D, Basara B, Tropea C (2016). Eddy-resolving simulations of the notchback DrivAer model: influence of underbody geometry and wheels rotation on aerodynamic behaviour. SAE Techn Pap: 2016–01–1602.

  • Jakirlic S, Kutej L, Basara B, Tropea C (2018). Scale-resolving simulation of an on-road overtaking maneuver involving model vehicles. SAE Techn Pap: 2018–01–0706.

  • Jeong J, Hussain F (1995) On the identification of a vortex. J Fluid Mech 285:69–94

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Josefsson E, Hagvall R, Urquhart M, Sebben S (2018). Numerical analysis of aerodynamic impact on passenger vehicles during cornering. SAE Techn Pap: 2018–37–0014.

  • Joseph P, Amandolese X, Aider JL (2012) Drag reduction on the 25 slant angle Ahmed reference body using pulsed jets. Exp Fluids 52(5):1169–1185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joseph P et al (2013) Flow control using MEMS pulsed micro-jets on the Ahmed body. Exp Fluids 54(1):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lafont T, Horak J, Damico R., Stelzer R, Bertolini C (2018). Passive treatment solutions for the reduction of vehicle exterior tire noise. SAE Techn Pap: 2018–01–1571.

  • Lindener N (1999). Aerodynamic testing of road vehicles in open jet wind tunnels. SAE SP-1465, Warrendale.

  • Liu C, Gao Y, Tian S, Dong X (2018) Rortex—a new vortex vector definition and vorticity tensor and vector decompositions. Phys Fluids 30(3):035103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oertel H Jr (1990) Wakes behind blunt bodies. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 22:539–562

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Pasquali A, Schönherr M, Geier M, Krafczyk M (2016) Simulation of external aerodynamics of the DrivAer model with the LBM on GPGPUs. Parallel Comput Road Exascale 27:391–400

    Google Scholar 

  • Peichl M, Mack S, Indinger T, Decker F (2014) Numerical investigation of the flow around a generic car using dynamic mode decomposition. In: ASME 2014 4th Joint US-european fluids engineering division summer meeting collocated with the ASME 2014 12th international conference on nanochannels, microchannels, and minichannels, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, pp V01CT17A002-V001CT017A002.

  • Peters BC, Uddin M, Bain J, Curley A, Henry M (2015). Simulating DrivAer with structured finite difference overset grids. SAE Techn Pap: 2015–01–1536.

  • Ringwall E (2017) Aeroacoustic sound sources around the wheels of a passenger car. Chalmers University of Technology, Master

    Google Scholar 

  • Schütz T, Des Automobils HA (2013) Stromungsmechanik, Warmetechnik, Fahrdynamik, Komfort, SpringerLink. Büche, Springer, Vieweg, Wiesbaden, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmonds N, Tsoutsanis P, Drikakis D, Gaylard A, Jansen W (2016). Full vehicle aero-thermal cooling drag sensitivity analysis for various radiator pressure drops. SAE Techn Pap: 2016–01–1578.

  • Soares RF, Garry K, Holt J (2017). Comparison of the far-field aerodynamic wake development for three drivaer model configurations using a cost-effective RANS simulation. Paper presented at the WCX17: SAE World Congress Experience, Detroit, Michigan, USA, 4–6 April 2017.

  • Stoll D, Schoenleber C, Wittmeier F, Kuthada T, Wiedemann J (2016) Investigation of aerodynamic drag in turbulent flow conditions. SAE Int J Passeng Cars Mech Syst 9:733–742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strangfeld C, Wieser D, Schmidt H-J, Woszidlo R., Nayeri C, Paschereit C (2013). Experimental study of baseline flow characteristics for the realistic car model drivaer. SAE Techn Pap: 2013–01–1251.

  • Thacker A, Aubrun S, Leroy A, Devinant P (2013) Experimental characterization of flow unsteadiness in the centerline plane of an Ahmed body rear slant. Exp Fluids 54:1479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theissen P, Wojciak J, Heuler K, Demuth R, Indinger T, Adams N (2011). Experimental investigation of unsteady vehicle aerodynamics under time-dependent flow conditions-part 1. SAE Techn Pap: 2011–01–0177.

  • Wang Q, Gan L, Xu S, Zhou Y (2020) Vortex evolution in the near wake behind polygonal cylinders. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci 110(1):109940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watkins S, Mousley P, Watmuff J, Prasad S (2004) The unsteady near-wake of a simplified passenger car. 15th australasian fluid mechanics conference. The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia, pp 13–17

    Google Scholar 

  • West G, Apelt C (1982) The effects of tunnel blockage and aspect ratio on the mean flow past a circular cylinder with Reynolds numbers between 10000 and 100000. J Fluid Mech 114:361–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wojciak J, Theissen P, Adams N, Indinger T, Demuth R (2011). Investigation of unsteady vehicle aerodynamics under time-dependent flow conditions. In: 29th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, 3349.

  • Wojciak J, Schnepf B, Indinger T, Adams N (2012) Study on the capability of an open source CFD software for unsteady vehicle aerodynamics. SAE Int J Commer Veh 5:196–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yong Y, Huan Y, Jing P (2017) Influence of ground effect on FSAE car diffuser design. Mech Sci Technol Aerosp Eng 04:146–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Q, Liu Y, Wang S (2014) The identification of coherent structures using proper orthogonal decomposition and dynamic mode decomposition. J Fluids Struct 49:53–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang BF, Zhou Y, To S (2015) Unsteady flow structures around a high-drag Ahmed body. J Fluid Mech 777:291–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang BF, Liu K, Zhou Y, To S, Tu JY (2018) Active drag reduction of a high-drag Ahmed body based on steady blowing. J Fluid Mech 856:351–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Zhang J, Wu K, Wang Z, Zhang Z (2019) Aerodynamic characteristics of mira fastback model in experiment and CFD. Int J Automot Technol 20(4):723–737

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work is supported by the funds of China Automotive Engineering Research Institute (MS-03-03) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants No. 11772173). The authors are grateful to Prof. Zhaofeng Tian from the University of Adelaide for the discussion of the results.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. AML, School of Aerospace Engineering, Tsinghua University, Zhongguancun north street, Haidian District, Beijing, 100084, China

    Jinsheng Liu, Zhihao Zhang & Shengjin Xu

  2. College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China

    Yumeng Wang

  3. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, Australia

    Mogeng Li

Authors
  1. Jinsheng Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zhihao Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yumeng Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mogeng Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Shengjin Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jinsheng Liu.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, J., Zhang, Z., Wang, Y. et al. Experimental study on the three-dimensional wake structure of the DrivAer standard model. J Vis 24, 443–460 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12650-020-00714-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12650-020-00714-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation