Abstract
Decision-making often requires taking into consideration immediate gains as well as delayed rewards. Studies of behavior have established that anticipated rewards are discounted according to a decreasing hyperbolic function. Although mathematical explanations for reward delay discounting have been offered, little has been proposed in terms of neural network mechanisms underlying discounting. There has been much recent interest in the potential role of the hippocampus. Here, we demonstrate that a previously established neural network model of hippocampal region CA3 contains a mechanism that could explain discounting in downstream reward-prediction systems (e.g., basal ganglia). As part of its normal function, the model forms codes for stimuli that are similar to future predicted stimuli. This similarity provides a means for reward predictions associated with future stimuli to influence current decision-making. Simulations show that this “predictive similarity” decreases as the stimuli are separated in time, at a rate that is consistent with hyperbolic discounting.
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Abbott LF, Blum KI. Functional significance of long-term potentiation for sequence learning and prediction. Cereb Cortex. 1996;6:406–16.
Addis DR, Cheng T, Roberts RP, Schacter DL. Hippocampal contributions to the episodic simulation of specific and general future events. Hippocampus .2011;21;1045–52.
August DA, Levy WB. Temporal sequence compression by an integrate-and-fire model of hippocampal area CA3. J Comput Neurosci. 1999;6:71–90.
Bamford NS, Zhang H, Schmitz Y, Wu N-P, Cepeda C, Levine MS, Schmauss C, Zakharenko SS, Zablow L, Sulzer D. Heterosynaptic dopamine neurotransmission selects sets of corticostriatal terminals. Neuron. 2004;42:653–63.
Bi GQ, Poo MM. Synaptic modifications in cultured hippocampal neurons: dependence on spike timing, synaptic strength, and postsynaptic cell type. J Neurosci. 1998;18:10464–72.
Cheung THC, Cardinal RN. Hippocampal lesions facilitate instrumental learning with delayed reinforcement but induce impulsive choice in rats. BMC Neurosci. 2005;6:36.
Figner B, Knoch D, Johnson EJ, Krosch AR, Lisanby SH, Fehr E, Weber EU. Lateral prefrontal cortex and self-control in intertemporal choice. Nat Neurosci. 2010;13:538–9.
Gamboz N, Brandimonte MA, De Vito S. The role of past in the simulation of autobiographical future episodes. Exp Psychol. 2010;57:419–28.
Green L, Myerson J, Ostaszewski P. Discounting of delayed rewards across the life span: age differences in individual discounting functions. Behav Process. 1999;46:89–96.
Gupta R, Duff M, Denburg N, Cohen N, Bechara A, Tranel D. Declarative memory is critical for sustained advantageous complex decision-making. Neuropsychologia. 2009;47:1686–93.
Hare TA, Camerer CF, Rangel A. Self-control in decision-making involves modulation of the vmpfc valuation system. Science. 2009;324:646–8.
Hassabis D, Kumaran D, Vann SD, Maguire EA. Patients with hippocampal amnesia cannot imagine new experiences. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:1726–31.
Hollerman JR, Tremblay L, Schultz W. Influence of reward expectation on behavior-related neuronal activity in primate striatum. J Neurophysiol. 1998;80:947–63.
Joel D, Niv Y, Ruppin E. Actor-critic models of the basal ganglia: new anatomical and computational perspectives. Neural Netw. 2002;15:535–47.
Johnson A, van der Meer MAA, Redish AD. Integrating hippocampus and striatum in decision-making. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2007;17:692–7.
Johnson A, Redish AD. Neural ensembles in CA3 transiently encode paths forward of the animal at a decision point. J Neurosci. 2007;27:12176–89.
Kable JW, Glimcher PW. The neural correlates of subjective value during intertemporal choice. Nat Neurosci. 2007;10:1625–33.
Kable JW, Glimcher PW. An "as soon as possible" effect in human intertemporal decision making: behavioral evidence and neural mechanisms. J Neurophysiol. 2010;103:2513–31.
Kacelnik A. Normative and descriptive models of decision making: time discounting and risk sensitivity. Ciba Found Symp. 1997;208:51–67; discussion 67–70.
Kelley A, Domesick V. The distribution of the projection from the hippocampal formation to the nucleus accumbens in the rat: an anterograde and retrograde-horseradish peroxidase study. Neuroscience. 1982;7:2321–35.
Lansink CS, Goltstein PM, Lankelma JV, McNaughton BL, Pennartz CMA. Hippocampus leads ventral striatum in replay of place-reward information. PLoS Biol. 2009; 7:e1000173.
Levy W. A computational approach to hippocampal function. Comput Model Learn Simple Neural Syst. 1989;23:243–305.
Levy WB. A sequence predicting CA3 is a flexible associator that learns and uses context to solve hippocampal-like tasks. Hippocampus. 1996;6:579–90.
Levy WB, Sanyal A, Rodriguez P, Sullivan DW, Wu XB. The formation of neural codes in the hippocampus: trace conditioning as a prototypical paradigm for studying the random recoding hypothesis. Biol Cybern. 2005;92:409–26.
Levy WB, Steward O. Temporal contiguity requirements for long-term associative potentiation/depression in the hippocampus. Neuroscience. 1983;8:791–7.
Liljenström H, Wu XB. Noise-enhanced performance in a cortical associative memory model. Int J Neural Syst. 1995;6:19–29.
Mariano TY, Bannerman DM, McHugh SB, Preston TJ, Rudebeck PH, Rudebeck SR, Rawlins JNP, Walton ME, Rushworth MFS, Baxter MG, Campbell TG. Impulsive choice in hippocampal but not orbitofrontal cortex-lesioned rats on a nonspatial decision-making maze task. Eur J Neurosci. 2009;30:472–84.
Markram H, Lübke J, Frotscher M, Sakmann B. Regulation of synaptic efficacy by coincidence of postsynaptic aps and epsps. Science. 1997;275:213–5.
Mazur J. An adjusting procedure for studying delayed reinforcement. Quant Anal Behav Eff Delay Interv Events Reinf Value. 1987;5:55.
Mazur JE, Biondi DR. Delay-amount tradeoffs in choices by pigeons and rats: hyperbolic versus exponential discounting. J Exp Anal Behav. 2009;91:197–211.
McClure SM, Ericson KM, Laibson DI, Loewenstein G, Cohen JD. Time discounting for primary rewards. J Neurosci. 2007;27:5796–804.
McClure SM, Laibson DI, Loewenstein G, Cohen JD. Separate neural systems value immediate and delayed monetary rewards. Science. 2004;306:503–7.
Mehta M, Barnes C, McNaughton B. Experience-dependent, asymmetric expansion of hippocampal place fields. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:8918.
Mehta M, Quirk M, Wilson M. Experience-dependent asymmetric shape of hippocampal receptive fields. Neuron. 2000;25:707–15.
Mitman K, Laurent P, Levy W. Defining time in a minimal hippocampal CA3 model by matching time-span of associative synaptic modification and input pattern duration. In: Neural networks, 2003. Proceedings of the international joint conference on 2003. p. 1631–1636 IEEE vol 3.
Monaco J, Levy W. T-maze training of a recurrent CA3 model reveals the necessity of novelty-based modulation of LTP in hippocampal region CA3. In Neural networks, 2003. Proceedings of the international joint conference on 2003. p. 1655–1660 IEEE vol 3.
Muzzio IA, Levita L, Kulkarni J, Monaco J, Kentros C, Stead M, Abbott LF, Kandel ER. Attention enhances the retrieval and stability of visuospatial and olfactory representations in the dorsal hippocampus. PLoS Biol. 2009;7:e1000140.
Pennartz CMA, Lee E, Verheul J, Lipa P, Barnes CA, McNaughton BL. The ventral striatum in off-line processing: ensemble reactivation during sleep and modulation by hippocampal ripples. J Neurosci. 2004;24:6446–56.
Peters J, Büchel C. Episodic future thinking reduces reward delay discounting through an enhancement of prefrontal-mediotemporal interactions. Neuron. 2010;66:138–48.
Polyn S, Wu X, Levy W. Entorhinal/dentate excitation of CA3: a critical variable in hippocampal models. Neurocomputing. 2000;32:493–499.
Rawlins JN, Feldon J, Butt S. The effects of delaying reward on choice preference in rats with hippocampal or selective septal lesions. Behav Brain Res. 1985;15:191–203.
Reynolds JNJ, Wickens JR. Dopamine-dependent plasticity of corticostriatal synapses. Neural Netw. 2002;15:507–21.
Schacter DL, Addis DR. On the nature of medial temporal lobe contributions to the constructive simulation of future events. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009;364:1245–53.
Schultz W, Dayan P, Montague PR. A neural substrate of prediction and reward. Science. 1997;275:1593–9.
Shadmehr R, Orban de Xivry JJ, Xu-Wilson M, Shih T-Y. Temporal discounting of reward and the cost of time in motor control. J Neurosci. 2010;30:10507–16.
Shon AP, Wu XB, Sullivan DW, Levy WB. Initial state randomness improves sequence learning in a model hippocampal network. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2002;65:031914.
Sompolinsky H, Kanter I. Temporal association in asymmetric neural networks. Phys Rev Lett. 1986;57:2861–2864.
Sullivan DW, Levy WB. Quantal synaptic failures enhance performance in a minimal hippocampal model. Network. 2004;15:45–67.
Suri RE, Schultz W. Learning of sequential movements by neural network model with dopamine-like reinforcement signal. Exp Brain Res. 1998;121:350–4.
Sutton RS, Barto AG. Reinforcement learning: an introduction. IEEE Trans Neural Netw. 1998;9:1054.
Wallenstein GV, Hasselmo ME. Gabaergic modulation of hippocampal population activity: sequence learning, place field development, and the phase precession effect. J Neurophysiol. 1997;78:393–408.
Wu X, Baxter RA, Levy WB. Context codes and the effect of noisy learning on a simplified hippocampal CA3 model. Biol Cybern. 1996;74:159–65.
Wu X, Liljenstrom H. Regulating the nonlinear dynamics of olfactory cortex. Netw Comput Neural Syst. 1994;5:47–60.
Acknowledgments
I thank Chip Levy, Joe Monaco, Sean Polyn, Steve Yantis, Kechen Zhang, and the anonymous reviewers for helpful discussions and comments on an earlier version of this manuscript. This work was supported by NIH grant R01-DA013165 to Steve Yantis.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Laurent, P.A. A Neural Mechanism for Reward Discounting: Insights from Modeling Hippocampal–Striatal Interactions. Cogn Comput 5, 152–160 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-012-9178-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-012-9178-8