Abstract
This paper reports a comprehensive review of literature on personalised learning in STEM and STEAM (or STE(A)M) education, which involves the disciplinary integration of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics, as well as Arts. The review covered the contexts of STE(A)M education where personalised learning was adopted, the objectives of personalised learning and research issues, and various aspects of practising personalisation. A total of 72 publications from 2011 to 2020 were collected from Scopus for review. The results reveal the widespread studies in this area across various countries/territories, levels of education, subject disciplines, and modes of education. The most common objective of personalised learning lied in catering for learning styles. The issue most frequently addressed focused on evaluating the effectiveness of technologies for personalised learning. Blended learning and learning analytics are the most popular means to achieve personalised learning. Among various aspects of learning, learning material is the one most frequently addressed. Also, the factors and criteria for personalising learning were summarised, which reveal the heterogeneous nature of learners who have their own learning ability, interest, style and progress. The results suggest more research on interdisciplinary and integrative approaches for STE(A)M learning to examine how personalisation can be applied effectively, as well as more investigation on integrating personalisation with the pedagogies and elements commonly introduced to STE(A)M education.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Alamri, H., Lowell, V., Watson, W., & Watson, S. L. (2020). Using personalized learning as an instructional approach to motivate learners in online higher education: Learner self-determination and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 52(3), 322–352
Balakrishnan, B. (2018). Motivating engineering students learning via monitoring in personalized learning environment with tagging system. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 26(3), 700–710
Bozkurt, A., Ucar, H., Durak, G., & Idin, S. (2019). The current state of the art in STEM research: A systematic review study. Cypriot Journal of Educational Science, 14(3), 374–383
Charlton, P., Preston, A., Karagiannidis, C., Kouroupetroglou, C., Grenon, M., Handschuh, S., & Koumpis, A. (2016). Use of the curiosity cabinet metaphor to support inclusive learning. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Software Development and Technologies for Enhancing Accessibility and Fighting Info-exclusion (pp. 309–314), Vila Real, Portugal
Clark, R. M., & Kaw, A. (2020). Adaptive learning in a numerical methods course for engineers: Evaluation in blended and flipped classrooms. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 28(1), 62–79
DeMink-Carthew, J., Olofson, M. W., LeGeros, L., Netcoh, S., & Hennessey, S. (2017). An analysis of approaches to goal setting in middle grades personalized learning environments. RMLE Online, 40(10), 1–11
Deng, Y., Lu, D., Chung, C. J., Huang, D., & Zeng, Z. (2018). Personalized learning in a virtual hands-on lab platform for computer science education. In 2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. 1–8). IEEE
Education Elements. (2017). 2016–2017 impact report: Building capacity for personalized learning and more. https://www.edelements.com/resources-old
Gao, X., Li, P., Shen, J., & Sun, H. (2020). Reviewing assessment of student learning in interdisciplinary STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 7, article 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00225-4
Ghergulescu, I., Moldovan, A. N., Muntean, C. H., & Muntean, G. M. (2020). Evaluation of an interactive personalised virtual lab in secondary schools. In: Lane, H.C., Zvacek, S., & Uhomoibhi, J. (eds) Computer Supported Education, Communications in Computer and Information Science, 1220. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58459-7_26
Gillet, D., de Jong, T., Sotirou, S., & Salzmann, C. (2013). Personalised learning spaces and federated online labs for STEM Education at School. Proceedings of 2013 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (pp. 769–773), Berlin
Grant, M. M. (2015). Using mobile devices to support formal, informal and semi-formal learning. In X. Ge, D. Ifenthaler, & J. M. Spector (Eds.), Emerging Technologies for STEAM Education (pp. 157–177). Springer
Groff, J. (2017). Personalized learning: The state of the field & future directions. Center for Curriculum Redesign. https://www.media.mit.edu/publications/personalized-learning/
Hogan, J., & Down, B. (2015). A STEAM school using the Big Picture Education (BPE) design for learning and school–what an innovative STEM Education might look like. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 23(3), 47–60
Høgheim, S., & Reber, R. (2015). Supporting interest of middle school students in mathematics through context personalization and example choice. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 42, 17–25
Hurson, A. R., Sedigh, S., Miller, L., & Shirazi, B. (2011). Enriching STEM education through personalization and teaching collaboration. Proceedings of 2011 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (pp. 543–549), Seattle
Jayarajah, K., Saat, R. M., & Rauf, R. A. A. (2014). A review of Science, Technology, Engineering & Mathematics (STEM) education research from 1999–2013: A Malaysian perspective. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science & Technology Education, 10(3), 155–163
Juskeviciene, A., Jasute, E., Kurilovas, E., & Mamcenko, J. (2016). Application of 1:1 mobile learning scenarios in computer engineering education. International Journal of Engineering Education, 32(3), 1087–1096
Kajonmanee, T., Chaipidech, P., Srisawasdi, N., & Chaipah, K. (2020). A personalised mobile learning system for promoting STEM discipline teachers’ TPACK development. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 14(2), 215–235
Kaw, A., Clark, R., Delgado, E., & Abate, N. (2019). Analyzing the use of adaptive learning in a flipped classroom for preclass learning. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 27(3), 663–678
Kolekar, S. V., Pai, R. M., & MM, M. P. (2019). Rule based adaptive user interface for adaptive E-learning system. Education and Information Technologies, 24(1), 613–641
Kwan, R., & Wong, B. T. M. (2021). Latest advances in STEAM education research and practice: A review of the literature. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 29(3), 323–339
Lee, M. H., Chai, C. S., & Hong, H. Y. (2019). STEM education in Asia Pacific: Challenges and development. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 28, 1–4
Li, Y., Wang, K., Xiao, Y., & Froyd, J. E. (2020). Research and trends in STEM education: A systematic review of journal publications. International Journal of STEM Education, 7, article 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00207-6
Li, K. C., & Wong, B. T. M. (2019). How learning has been personalised: A review of literature from 2009 to 2018. In Cheung, et al. (Eds.), Blended Learning: Educational Innovation for Personalized Learning (pp. 72–81). Springer
Li, K. C., & Wong, B. T. M. (2020a). Personalising learning with learning analytics: A review of the lit-erature. In Cheung, et al. (Eds.), Blended Learning: Education in a Smart Learning Environment (pp. 39–48). Springer
Li, K. C., & Wong, B. T. M. (2020b). Trends of learning analytics in STE(A)M education: A review of case studies. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 17(3), 323–335
Li, K. C., & Wong, B. T. M. (2021). Features and trends of personalised learning: A review of journal publications from 2001 to 2018. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(2), 182–195
Liao, C. (2016). From interdisciplinary to transdisciplinary: An arts-integrated approach to STEAM education. Art Education, 69(6), 44–49
Lim, L. A., Dawson, S., Gašević, D., Joksimović, S., Pardo, A., Fudge, A., & Gentili, S. (2020). Students’ perceptions of, and emotional responses to, personalised learning analytics-based feedback: An exploratory study of four courses. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(3), 339–359
Liu, M., McKelroy, E., Corliss, S. B., & Carrigan, J. (2017). Investigating the effect of an adaptive learning intervention on students’ learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(6), 1605–1625
Margot, K. C., & Kettler, T. (2019). Teachers’ perception of STEM integration and education: A sys-tematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(2), https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0151-2
McCarthy, E. M., Liu, Y., & Schauer, K. L. (2020). Strengths-based blended personalized learning: An impact study using virtual comparison group. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 52(3), 353–370
Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106(1), 213–228
National Association of State Boards of Education. (2002). Most likely to succeed—Policy making in support of a restructured high school. Alexandria, VA: NASBE
Perignat, E., & Katz-Buonincontro, J. (2019). STEAM in practice and research: An integrative literature review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 31, 31–43
Plass, J. L., & Pawar, S. (2020). Toward a taxonomy of adaptivity for learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 52(3), 275–300
Pliner, E. M., Dukes, A. A., Beschorner, K. E., & Mahboobin, A. (2020). Effects of student interests on engagement and performance in biomechanics. Journal of Applied Biomechanics, 36(5), 360–367
Salahli, M. A., Özdemir, M., & Yasar, C. (2013). Concept based approach for adaptive personalized course learning system. International Education Studies, 6(5), 92–103
Shchedrina, E., Galkina, E., Petunina, I., & Lushkov, R. (2020). Integration of mobile learning into complex problem-solving processes during STEM education. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 14(21), 19–37
Song, Y., Wong, L. H., & Looi, C. K. (2012). Fostering personalized learning in science inquiry supported by mobile technologies. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60(4), 679–701
Takeuchi, M. A., Sengupta, P., Shanahan, M. C., Adams, J. D., & Hachem, M. (2020). Transdisciplinarity in STEM education: A critical review. Studies in Science Education, 56(2), 213–253
Thibaut, L., Ceuppens, S., De Loof, H., De Meester, J., Goovaerts, L., Struyf, A., & Depaepe, F. (2018). Integrated STEM education: A systematic review of instructional practices in secondary education. European Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 02. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/85525
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology (2017). Reimagining the role of technology in education: 2017 national education technology plan update. Retrieved from https://tech.ed.gov/files/2017/01/NETP17.pdf
Xie, H., Chu, H. C., Hwang, G. J., & Wang, C. C. (2019). Trends and development in technology-enhanced adaptive/personalized learning: A systematic review of journal publications from 2007 to 2017. Computers and Education, 140, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103599
Walkington, C., & Bernacki, M. L. (2019). Personalizing algebra to students’ individual interests in an intelligent tutoring system: Moderators of impact. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 29(1), 58–88
Walkington, C., & Bernacki, M. L. (2020). Appraising research on personalized learning: Definitions, theoretical alignment, advancements, and future directions. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 52(3), 235–252
Wang, T. H. (2014). Developing an assessment-centered e-Learning system for improving student learning effectiveness. Computers & Education, 73, 189–203
Wang, S., Christensen, C., Cui, W., Tong, R., Yarnall, L., Shear, L., & Feng, M. (2020). When adaptive learning is effective learning: Comparison of an adaptive learning system to teacher-led instruction. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1808794
Wong, B. T. M., & Li, K. C. (2020). Meeting diverse student needs for support services: A comparison between face-to-face and distance-learning students. In K. C. Li, E. Y. M. Tsang, & B. T. M. Wong (Eds.), Innovating Education in Technology-Support Environments (pp. 253–268). Springer
You, X., Li, M., & Liu, H. (2019). The feedback of the Chinese learning diagnosis system for personalized learning in classrooms. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, article 1751
Zhu, Q., & Wang, M. (2020). Team-based mobile learning supported by an intelligent system: Case study of STEM students. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(5), 543–559
Acknowledgements
The work described in this paper was partially supported by a grant from Hong Kong Metropolitan University (2021/011).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Li, K.C., Wong, B.Tm. Personalisation in STE(A)M education: a review of literature from 2011 to 2020. J Comput High Educ 35, 186–201 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-022-09341-2
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-022-09341-2