3D learning spaces and activities fostering users’ learning, acceptance, and creativity

• Arguel, A., & Jamet, E. (2009). Using video and static pictures to improve learning of procedural contents. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), 354–359.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ayres, P., Marcus, N., Chan, C., & Qian, N. (2009). Learning hand manipulative tasks: When instructional animations are superior to equivalent static representations. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), 348–353.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ayres, P., & Paas, F. (2007). Making instructional animations more effective: A cognitive load approach. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21(6), 695–700.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ayres, P., & Sweller, J. (2005). The split-attention principle in multimedia learning. The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, 2, 135–146.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Berry, D., & Dienes, Z. P. (1993). Implicit learning: Theoretical and empirical issues. New York, NY: Psychology Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Brunken, R., Plass, J. L., & Leutner, D. (2003). Direct measurement of cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 53–61.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Castro-Alonso, J. C., Ayres, P., & Paas, F. (2015). Animations showing Lego manipulative tasks: Three potential moderators of effectiveness. Computers & Education, 85, 1–13.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8(4), 293–332.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• De Koning, B. B., Tabbers, H. K., Rikers, R. M., & Paas, F. (2009). Towards a framework for attention cueing in instructional animations: Guidelines for research and design. Educational Psychology Review, 21(2), 113–140.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• De Koning, B. B., Tabbers, H. K., Rikers, R. M., & Paas, F. (2011). Attention cueing in an instructional animation: The role of presentation speed. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 41–45.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Garland, T. B., & Sanchez, C. A. (2013). Rotational perspective and learning procedural tasks from dynamic media. Computers & Education, 69, 31–37.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hart, S. G., & Staveland, L. E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index). Advances in Psychology, 52, 139–183.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hegarty, M. (2004). Dynamic visualizations and learning: Getting to the difficult questions. Learning and Instruction, 14(3), 343–351.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Höffler, T. N., & Leutner, D. (2007). Instructional animation versus static pictures: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 17(6), 722–738.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hwang, Y., & Shin, D. (2018). The roles of visual experience in enhancing user performance in virtual environments. Social Behavior and Personality, 46(1), 11–24. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.6500.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Mayer, R. E. (2010). Unique contributions of eye-tracking research to the study of learning with graphics. Learning and Instruction, 20(2), 167–171.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2002). Animation as an aid to multimedia learning. Educational Psychology Review, 14(1), 87–99.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43–52.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Paas, F., & Sweller, J. (2012). An evolutionary upgrade of cognitive load theory: Using the human motor system and collaboration to support the learning of complex cognitive tasks. Educational Psychology Review, 24(1), 27–45.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Paas, F., Tuovinen, J., Tabbers, H., & van Gerven, P. W. M. (2003). Cognitive load measurement as a means to advance cognitive load theory. Educational Psychologist, 38, 63–71.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ryle, G. (2009). The concept of mind. New York, NY: Routledge.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Shin, D. (2012). 3DTV as a social platform for communication and interaction. Information Technology and People, 25(1), 55–80.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Shin, D. (2017). The role of affordance in the experience of virtual reality learning. Telematics and Informatics, 34(8), 1826–1836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.05.013.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Shin, D., An, H., & Kim, J. (2016a). How the second screens change the way people interact and learn: The effects of second screen use on information processing. Interactive Learning Environment, 24(8), 2058–2079. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2015.1076851.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Shin, D., Choi, M., Kim, J., & Lee, J. (2016b). Interaction, engagement, and perceived interactivity in single-handed interaction. Internet Research, 26(5), 1134–1157. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-12-2014-0312.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Shin, D., & Chung, K. (2017). The effects of input modality and story-based knowledge on users’ game experience. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 180–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.030.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Tversky, B., Morrison, J. B., & Betrancourt, M. (2002). Animation: Can it facilitate? International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 57(4), 247–262.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Van Gog, T., Paas, F., Marcus, N., Ayres, P., & Sweller, J. (2009). The mirror neuron system and observational learning: Implications for the effectiveness of dynamic visualizations. Educational Psychology Review, 21(1), 21–30.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Wong, A., Marcus, N., Ayres, P., Smith, L., Cooper, G. A., Paas, F., et al. (2009). Instructional animations can be superior to statics when learning human motor skills. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), 339–347.

  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references