Examining mobile learning trends 2003–2008: a categorical meta-trend analysis using text mining techniques

• Attewell, J. (2005). Mobile technologies and learning: A technology update and m-learning project summary. London, UK: Learning and Skills Development Agency. Retrieved from http://www.m-learning.org/docs/The%20m-learning%20project%20-%20technology%20update%20and%20project%20summary.pdf.

• Attewell, J., & Savill-Smith, C. (2004). Learning with mobile devices: Research and development. London, UK: Learning and Skills Development Agency.

  Google Scholar 

• Bernard, R., Abrami, P. L., Lou, Y., & Borokhovski, E. (2004). How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 74, 379–439.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Clark, R. E. (1994). Media will never influence learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 21–29.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Evans, C. (2008). The effectiveness of m-learning in the form of podcast revision lectures in higher education. Computers & Education, 50(2), 491–498.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Executive Yuan of the Republic of China. (2005). National Science and Technology Program for e-learning [website]. Retrieved from http://elnpweb.ncu.edu.tw/old/english/english1.htm.

• Fayyad, U. M., Pitatesky-Shapiro, G., Smyth, P., & Uthurasamy, R. (1996). Advances in knowledge discovery and data mining, AAAI/MIT Press.

• Feldman, R., & Dagan, I. (1995). Knowledge discovery in textual databases (KDT). Proceedings of the first international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining (KDD-95), 112–117.

• Gall, M. D., Borg, W. R., & Gall, J. P. (1996). Educational research: An introduction (6th ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman.

  Google Scholar 

• Geddes, S. (2004). Mobile learning in the 21st century: Benefit for learners. Knowledge Tree e-journal. Retrieved from https://olt.qut.edu.au/udf/OLTCONFERENCEPAPERS/gen/static/papers/Cobcroft_OLT2006_paper.pdf.

• Keshaval, G. A. G., & Gowda, M. P. (2008). ACM transaction on information systems (1989–2006): A bibliometric study. Information Studies, 14(4), 223–234.

  Google Scholar 

• Gwet, K. L. (2010). Handbook of inter-rater reliability: The definitive guide to measuring the extent of agreement among raters. Gaithersburg, MD: Advanced Analytics, LLC.

  Google Scholar 

• Hung, J. L. (2010). Trends of e-learning research from 2000–2008: use of text mining and bibliometrics. British Journal of Educational Technology. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/%28ISSN%291467-8535/earlyview.

• Jain, A. K., & Dubes, R. C. (1988). Algorithms for clustering data. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

  Google Scholar 

• Johnson, S. D., Aragon, S. R., & Shaik, N. (2000). Comparative analysis of learner satisfaction and learning outcomes in online and face-to-face learning environments. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 11(1), 29–49.

  Google Scholar 

• Kim, P., Miranda, T., & Olaciregui, C. (2008). Pocket school: Exploring mobile technology as a sustainable literacy education option for underserved indigenous children in Latin America. International Journal of Educational Development, 28(4), 435–445.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kulik, C. C., & Kulik, J. A. (1991). Effectiveness of computer-based instruction: An updated analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 7, 75–94.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lehner, F., & Nösekabel, H. (2002). The role of mobile devices in e-learning: First experiences with a wireless e-learning environment. Paper presented at IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education, Växjö, Sweden.

• Lockwood, F. (2007). Forword. In G. Conole & M. Oliver (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives in e-learning research: Themes, methods, and impacts on practice (pp. xvi–xvii). New York, NY: Routledge.

  Google Scholar 

• Mihalca, L., & Miclea, M. (2007). Current trends in educational technology research. Cognition, Brain, Behavior, 11(1), 115–129.

  Google Scholar 

• Mogil, S. J., Simmonds, K., & Simmonds, J. M. (2009). Pain research from 1975 to 2007: A categorical and bibliometric meta-tend analysis of every research paper published in the journal, Pain. Pain, 142, 48–58.

• Motlik, S. (2008). Mobile learning in developing nations. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(2). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/564/1071.

• Narin, F., Olivastro, D., & Stevens, K. A. (1994). Bibliometrics: Theory, practice and problems. Evaluation Review, 18(1), 65–76.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Okubo, Y. (1997). Bibliometric indicators and analysis of research systems: Methods and examples, STI Working Papers 1997/1, OECD Science, Paris.

• Osareh, F. (1996). Bibliometrics, citation analysis and co-citation analysis: A review of literature I. Libri, (46), 149–158.

• Polsson, K. (2009). Chronology of handheld computers. Retrieved from http://www.islandnet.com/~kpolsson/handheld/.

• Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Sharma, S., & Kitchens, F. (2004). Web services architecture for m-learning. Electronic Journal of e-Learning (2), 203–216.

• Thelwall, M. (2008). Bibliometrics to webometrics. Journal of Information Science, 34(4), 605–621.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Winn, W. D. (2002). Current trends in educational technology research: The study of learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, 1(3), 331–351.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Zhang, K. (2008). Ubiquitous technology for language learning: The U-Japan movement in higher education. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 20(2), 81–91.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Zhang, K., & Hung, J. L. (2006). E-learning in Taiwan: Policies, practices, and problems. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 2(1), 37–52.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Zhang, K., & Hung, J. L. (2009). E-learning in supplemental educational systems in Taiwan: Present status and future challenges. International Journal on E-Learning, 8(4), 49–64.

  Google Scholar 

Download references