[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

User profiling based on multi-criteria analysis: the role of utility functions

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Operational Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Personalized profiles that describe user behaviour and preferences are encountered in many applications, ranging from recommender systems or user agents (Web browsers) to one-to-one marketing. User profiling is a crucial step in providing accurate product recommendations to the end users. Once groups of people with similar preferences are identified, information, products, or services tailored to group’s needs, can be delivered. The aim of this paper is to clarify the role of utility functions in the formation of user profiles. Thus, the clustering behaviour of customers’ preferences is investigated by means of clustering algorithms and preference modelling. It is shown in this work that the incorporation of a Multi-criteria methodology prior to the application of a clustering algorithm constitutes a fundamental step for the formation of more accurate user profiles in terms of compactness and separation of the groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adomavicius G, Tuzhilin A (2005) Personalization Technologies: A Process-Oriented Perspective. Communications of the ACM 48(10)

  • Figueira J, Greco S, Ehrgott M (eds) (2005) Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys. Springer, Boston

  • Halkidi M, Batistakis Y, Vazirgiannis M (2002a) Cluster validity methods: Part I. SIGMOD Rec 31(2):40–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halkidi M, Batistakis Y, Vazirgiannis M (2002b) Clustering validity checking methods: Part II. SIGMOD Rec 31(3):19–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacquet-Lagrèze E, Siskos Y (1982) Assessing a set of additive utility functions for multicriteria decision making: the UTA method. Eur J Oper Res 10(2):151–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeney RL, Raiffa H (1993) Decisions with multiple objectives-preferences and value tradeoffs. Cambridge University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Likas A, Vlassis N, Verbeek J (2003) The global k-means clustering algorithm. Pattern Recognit 36(2):451–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacQueen JB (1967) Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. In: 5th Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, Berkeley, University of California Press

  • Öztürk M, Tsoukiàs A, Vincke Ph (2005) Preference modelling. In: Ehrgott M, Greco S, Figueira J (eds) State of the art in multiple criteria decision analysis, Springer, Boston, pp 27–72

  • Roy B (1985) Méthodologie Multicritère d’Aide à la Décision. Economica

  • Siskos Y, Yannacopoulos D (1985) UTASTAR, An ordinal regression method for building additive value functions. Invest Oper 5(1):39–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Siskos Y, Matsatsinis NF (1993) A DSS for market analysis and new product design. J Decis Syst 2(1):35–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Siskos Y, Grigoroudis E, Matsatsinis N (2005) UTA methods. Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys. Figueira J, Greco S, Ehrgott M. Springer, Boston, pp 297–344

  • Tan P-N, Steinbach M, Kumar V (2006) Cluster analysis: basic concepts and algorithms. Introduction to data mining. Addison-Wesley, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  • Wedel M, Kamakura W (2000) Market segmentation: conceptual and methodological foundations. Kluwer, Dordrecht

  • Zopounidis C, Doumpos M (2002) Multicriteria classification and sorting methods: a literature review. Eur J Oper Res 138(2):229–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to professors, M. Doumpos, N. Vlassis and A. Doulamis who contributed their time and knowledge to this work and also to the anonymous referees for their valuable comments. This work is part of the 03ED375 research project, implemented within the framework of the “Reinforcement Programme of Human Research Manpower” (PENED) and co-financed by National and Community Funds (75% from E.U.-European Social Fund and 25% from the Greek Ministry of Development-General Secretariat of Research and Technology).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Decision Support Systems Laboratory, Technical University of Crete, University Campus, 73100, Chania, Greece

    Kleanthi Lakiotaki, Pavlos Delias & Nikolaos F. Matsatsinis

  2. Institute of Computer Science, FORTH, 71110, Heraklion, Greece

    Vangelis Sakkalis

Authors
  1. Kleanthi Lakiotaki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pavlos Delias
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Vangelis Sakkalis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Nikolaos F. Matsatsinis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nikolaos F. Matsatsinis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lakiotaki, K., Delias, P., Sakkalis, V. et al. User profiling based on multi-criteria analysis: the role of utility functions. Oper Res Int J 9, 3–16 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-008-0024-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-008-0024-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation