[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

A fault-tolerant structural health monitoring protocol using wireless sensor networks

  • Published:
annals of telecommunications - annales des télécommunications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In wireless sensor network-based event detection approaches, when the decision is taken based on the measurements of sensors, sensor-fault and noise-related measurement error should be taken into account. Using Bayesian approach to form a judgment is problematic without additional information or assumptions (for example, the difficulty of knowing prior probabilities in practice). In making the final decision using the majority decision rule (as well as the k-out-of-n rule), measurement of every sensor is considered as fully reliable. However, due to sensor fault and environmental noise, the preciseness of all measurements may not be guaranteed in real-life applications. This paper presents a Dempster–Shafer theory of evidence-based structural health monitoring protocol using wireless sensor networks that overcome these limitations. Our proposal effectively discounts the unreliable observer’s (sensor’s) measurements. Extensive simulations show significant improvement in terms of detection accuracy as compared to other well-known approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chang F-K (2001) Structural health monitoring: The demands and challenges. CRC, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lynch JP, Sundararajan A, Law KH, Kiremidjian AS, Carryer E (2003) Power-efficient data management for a wireless structural monitoring system. Proc. of the 4th International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, pp. 15–17

  3. Xu N et al (2004) A wireless sensor network for structural monitoring. Proc. of SENSYS. ACM, pp. 13–24

  4. Mechitov K, Kim W, Agha G, Nagayama T (2004) High-frequency distributed sensing for structure monitoring. Proc. of First Intl. Workshop on Networked Sensing Systems (INSS)

  5. Hamid MA, Wadud MA, Alam MM (2011) A reliable structural health monitoring protocol using wireless sensor networks. In: Proc. of the 14th International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (ICCIT 2011), December 2011, Dhaka, vol. 13, issue 6, pp. 601–606

  6. Lynch JP, Sundararajan A, Law KH, Kiremidjian AS, Carryer E, Sohn H, Farrar C. R (2003) Field validation of a wireless structural monitoring system on the Alamosa Canyon Bridge. Proc. of SPIE’s 10th Annual International Symposium on Smart Structures and Materials, San Diego, March 2–6, 2003.

  7. Mascareñas D, Flynn E, Farrar C, Park G, Todd M (2009) A mobile host approach for wireless powering and interrogation of structural health monitoring sensor networks. IEEE Sensors J 9(12):1719–1726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Benini L, Brunelli D, Petrioli C, Silvestri S (2010) GENESI: Green sEnsor NEtworks for Structural monItoring. 7th Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor Mesh and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks SECON 2010, pp. 10–12

  9. Ling Q, Tian Z, Yin Y, Li Y (2009) Localized structural health monitoring using energy-efficient wireless sensor networks. IEEE Sensors J 9(11):1596–1604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chin J, Rautenberg JM, Ma CYT, Pujol S, Yau DKY (2009) An experimental low-cost, low-data-rate rapid structural assessment network. IEEE Sensors J 9(11):1361–1369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lédeczi Á, Hay T, Völgyesi P, Hay DR, Nádas A, Jayaraman S (2009) Wireless acoustic emission sensor network for structural monitoring. IEEE Sensors J 9(11):1370–1377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Krishnamachari B, Iyengar S (2004) Distributed Bayesian algorithms for fault-tolerant event region detection in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans Comput 53:241–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Koller D, Friedman N (2009) Probabilistic graphical models—principles and techniques. MIT, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  14. Luo X, Member S, Dong M, Huang Y (2006) On distributed fault-tolerant detection in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans Comput 55(1):58–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Salicone S (2006) Measurement uncertainty: An approach via the mathematical theory of evidence. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  16. Varshney PK (1996) Distributed detection and data fusion. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  17. Guan JW, Bell DA (1991) Evidence theory and its applications. North-Holland, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Osswald C, Martin A (2008) Discrete labels and rich foci in theory of evidence. International Conference on Information Fusion, pp. 1426–1423

  19. Cobb BR, Shenoy PP (2006) On the plausibility transformation method for translating belief function models to probability models. Int J Approx Reason 41(3):314–330

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Denoeux T (1997) Analysis of evidence—theoretic decision rules for pattern classification. Pattern Recog 30(7):095–1107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Smets P (1990) The combination of evidence in the transferable belief model. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 12:447–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Smets P (2005) Decision making in the TBM: the necessity of the pignistic transformation. Int J Approx Reason 38:133–147

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Denoeux T (2000) A neural network classifier based on Dempster–Shafer theory. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 30(2):131–150

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Boston JR (2000) A signal detection system based on Dempster–Shafer theory and comparison to fuzzy detection. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, vol. 30, pp. 45–51

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Hankuk University of Foreign Studies Research Fund of 2012.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Industrial and Management Engineering, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Yongin, 449-791, Korea

    M. Abdullah-Al-Wadud

  2. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Green University of Bangladesh, Dhaka, 1216, Bangladesh

    Md. Abdul Hamid

Authors
  1. M. Abdullah-Al-Wadud
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Md. Abdul Hamid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Md. Abdul Hamid.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abdullah-Al-Wadud, M., Hamid, M.A. A fault-tolerant structural health monitoring protocol using wireless sensor networks. Ann. Telecommun. 69, 219–228 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12243-012-0336-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12243-012-0336-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation