[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

A multi-faced measurement study on a large private BitTorrent community

  • Published:
Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Private BitTorrent community is becoming increasingly popular, and generates a huge amount of Internet traffic. In this paper, we present a thorough measurement study on a famous private BitTorrent community, CHDBits. We find that the content of torrents published in this community are highly available, although many torrents may have been released for a very long time, and we also obtain that users in most torrents could download at a high rate. By studying user profiles, we show that many users have participated in multiple torrents, thereby generating a great amount of upload and download traffic. The user profiles also reveal that almost all users maintain a high share ratio, and are willing to contribute to content distribution by spending more time in seeding than in leeching (downloading). Our study suggests that the bandwidths of a user have a significant impact on their behavior. Low bandwidth users are more likely to participate in the torrents with a smaller content size or a higher popularity; compared with low bandwidth users, high bandwidth users tend to participate in more torrents, but spend much less time in seeding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We may sometimes use “community” or “private community” to refer to “private BitTorrent community” for the ease of expression, if without ambiguity.

  2. If no ambiguity raises, the term “user” will be used when we refer to the “register user” for the simplicity of expression.

  3. As each peer periodically notifies the CHDBits tracker of its current download progress, CHDBits can leverage this information to identify the type of each peer.

  4. If not otherwise stated, the data in the snapshot of CHDBits collected on 2011/09/03 will be used in the figures presenting the status of CHDBits at a specific time. The selection of snapshot time exerts little impact on system status, since CHDBits has run for a long time.

  5. During the ten-day period, 08/28, 09/03, and 09/04 are weekend.

  6. Recall that the total traffic generated by CHDBits users was a little less than 100 PB on 2011/09/03, as shown in Fig. 1.

References

  1. CHDBits. http://chdbits.org

  2. TorrenTGui. http://ttg.im

  3. HDStar. http://www.hdstar.org

  4. OpenCD. http://open.cd

  5. Bharambe AR, Herley C, Padmanabhan VN (2006) Analyzing and improving a BitTorrent networks performance mechanisms. In: Proceedings of 25th IEEE conference on computer communications. Barcelona

  6. Cai QC, Lo KT (2012) Two blocks are enough: on the feasibility of using network coding to ameliorate the content availability of bittorrent swarms. To appear in IEEE transactions on parallel and distributed systems

  7. Chen X, Jiang Y, Chu X (2010) Measurements, analysis and modeling of private trackers. In: 2010 IEEE tenth international conference on peer-to-peer computing. Netherlands

  8. Fan B, Chiu DM, Lui JCS (2006) Stochastic analysis and file availability enhancement for bt-like file sharing systems. In: Proceedings of 14th IEEE international workshop on quality of service. Yale University, New Haven, pp 30–39

    Google Scholar 

  9. Guo L, Chen S, Tan E, Ding X, Zhang X (2005) Measurements, analysis, and modeling of bittorrent-like systems. In: Proceedings of the ACM/SIGCOMM internet measurement conference. Berkeley, pp 35–48

  10. Guo L, Chen S, Xiao Z, Tan E, Ding X, Zhang X (2007) A performance study of bittorrent-like peer-to-peer systems. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 25(1):155–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Izal M, Urvoy-Keller G, Biersack E, Felber P, Hamra AA, Garces-Erice L (2004) Dissecting BitTorrent: five months in a torrent’s lifetime. In: Passive and active measurements. Antibes Juan-les-Pins

  12. Jia A, Chen X, Chu X, Pouwelse J (2011) From user experience to strategies: how to survive in a private bittorrent community. Tech. Rep. PDS-2011-004

  13. Jia A, Rahman R, Vinko T, Pouwelse J, Epema D (2011) Fast download but eternal seeding: the reward and punishment of sharing ratio enforcement. In: 2011 IEEE international conference on peer-to-peer computing. Kyoto, pp 280–289

  14. Jun S, Ahamad M (2005) Incentives in bittorrent induce free riding. In: Proceedings of the 2005 ACM SIGCOMM workshop on economics of peer-to-peer systems. Philadelphia, pp 116–121

  15. Kash IA, Lai JK, Zhang H, Zohar A (2012) Economics of bittorrent communities. In: Proceedings of the 21st international conference on world wide web. Rio de Janeiro, pp 221–230

  16. Kaune S, Rumin RC, Tyson G, Mauthe A, Guerrero C, Steinmetz R (2010) Unraveling bittorrent’s file unavailability: measurements and analysis. In: 2010 IEEE tenth international conference on peer-to-peer computing. Delft

  17. Legout A, Liogkas N, Kohler E, Zhang L (2007) Clustering and sharing incentives in bittorrent systems. In: Proceedings of the 2007 ACM SIGMETRICS international conference on measurement and modeling of computer systems. San Diego, pp 301–312

  18. Legout A, Urvoy-Keller G, Michiardi P (2006) Rarest first and choke algorithms are enough. In: Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGCOMM conference on internet measurement. Rio de Janeiro, pp 203–216

  19. Levin D, LaCurts K, Spring N, Bhattacharjee B (2008) Bittorrent is an auction: analyzing and improving bittorrent’s incentives. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2008 conference on data communication. Seattle, pp 243–254

  20. Li HQ, Lui JCS (2009) On modeling clustering indexes of bt-like systems. In: Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE international conference on communications. Piscataway, pp 1292–1297

  21. Liu Z, Dhungel P, Wu D, Zhang C, Ross KW (2010) Understanding and improving ratio incentives in private communities. In: Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE 30th international conference on distributed computing systems. Washington, pp 610–621

  22. Massoulie L, Vojnovic M (2008) Coupon replication systems. IEEE/ACM Trans Netw 16(3):603–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Menasche DS, Rocha AAA, Li B, Towsley D, Venkataramani A (2009) Content availability and bundling in swarming systems. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on emerging networking experiments and technologies. Rome, pp 121–132

  24. Meulpolder M, D’Acunto L, Capotă M, Wojciechowski M, Pouwelse JA, Epema DHJ, Sips HJ (2010) Public and private bittorrent communities: a measurement study. In: Proceedings of the 9th international workshop on peer-to-peer systems. San Jose

  25. Neglia G, Zhang H, Towsley D, Venkataramani A, Danaher J (2007) Availability in bittorrent systems. In: Proceedings of the 26th IEEE international conference on computer communications. Anchorage, pp 2216–2224

  26. Piatek M, Isdal T, Anderson T, Krishnamurthy A, Venkataramani A (2007) Do incentives build robustness in bittorrent? In: Proceedings of the 4th USENIX symposium on networked systems design & implementation (NSDI). Cambridge, pp 1–14

  27. Pouwelse JA, Garbacki P, Epema DHJ, Sips HJ (2005) The Bittorrent P2p file-sharing system: measurements and analysis. In: Proceedings of the 4th international workshop on peer-to-peer systems. Ithaca

  28. Qiu D, Srikant R (2004) Modeling and performance analysis of bittorrent-like peer-to-peer networks. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM. Portland, pp 367–378

  29. Tian Y, Wu D, Ng KW (2006) Modeling, analysis and improvement for bittorrent-like file sharing networks. In: The 25th IEEE international conference on computer communications. Barcelona

  30. Zhang C, Dhungel P, Wu D, Liu Z, Ross K (2010) Bittorrent darknets. In: Proceedings of IEEE international conference on computer communications. San Diego

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Electronic & Information Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, People’s Republic China

    Qing-Chao Cai & Kwok-Tung Lo

Authors
  1. Qing-Chao Cai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kwok-Tung Lo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kwok-Tung Lo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cai, QC., Lo, KT. A multi-faced measurement study on a large private BitTorrent community. Peer-to-Peer Netw. Appl. 8, 32–48 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12083-013-0207-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12083-013-0207-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation