[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Animal Models in Forensic Science Research: Justified Use or Ethical Exploitation?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A moral dilemma exists in biomedical research relating to the use of animal or human tissue when conducting scientific research. In human ethics, researchers need to justify why the use of humans is necessary should suitable models exist. Conversely, in animal ethics, a researcher must justify why research cannot be carried out on suitable alternatives. In the case of medical procedures or therapeutics testing, the use of animal models is often justified. However, in forensic research, the justification may be less evident, particularly when research involves the infliction of trauma on living animals. To determine how the forensic science community is dealing with this dilemma, a review of literature within major forensic science journals was conducted. The frequency and trends of the use of animals in forensic science research was investigated for the period 1 January 2012–31 December 2016. The review revealed 204 original articles utilizing 5050 animals in various forms as analogues for human tissue. The most common specimens utilized were various species of rats (35.3%), pigs (29.3%), mice (17.7%), and rabbits (8.2%) although different specimens were favored in different study themes. The majority of studies (58%) were conducted on post-mortem specimens. It is, however, evident that more needs to be done to uphold the basic ethical principles of reduction, refinement and replacement in the use of animals for research purposes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baumans, V. (2004). Use of animals in experimental research: An ethical dilemma? Gene Therapy, 11, S64–S66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carbone, L., Guanzini, L., & McDonald, C. (2003). Adoption options for laboratory animals. Lab Animal, 32(9), 37–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coelho, L., & Cardoso, H. F. V. (2013). Timing of blunt force injuries in long bones: The effects of the environment, PMI length and human surrogate model. Forensic Science International, 233, 230–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curzer, H. J., Perry, G., Wallace, M. C., & Perry, D. (2016). The three Rs of animal research: What they mean for the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and why. Science and Engineering Ethics, 22(2), 549–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeGrazia, D., & Sebo, J. (2015). Necessary conditions for morally responsible animal research. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 24, 420–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiGangi, B. A., Crawford, P. C., & Levy, J. K. (2006). Outcome of cats adopted from a biomedical research program. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 9(2), 143–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elger, B. S., Hofner, M., & Mangin, P. (2009). Research involving biological material from forensic autopsies: Legal and ethical issues. Pathobiology, 76, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Festing, S., & Wilkinson, R. (2007). The ethics of animal research. EMBO Reports, 8(6), 526–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franco, N. H., & Olsson, I. A. S. (2016). Killing animals as a necessary evil? The case of animal research. In F. L. B. Meijboom & E. N. Stassen (Eds.), The end of animal life: A start for ethical debate (pp. 187–202). Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Garret, J. R. (Ed.). (2012). The ethics of animal research: Exploring the controversy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghasemi, M., & Dehpour, A. R. (2009). Ethical considerations in animal studies. Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, 2, 12–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heathfield, L. J., Maistry, S., Martin, L. J., Ramesar, R., & De Vries, J. (2017). Ethical considerations in forensic genetics research on tissue samples collected post-mortem in Cape Town, South Africa. BMC Medical Ethics, 18(1), 66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Home Office. (2016). Annual statistics of scientific procedures on living animals Great Britain 2015. London: Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationary Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim, D. M. (2006). Reduce, refine, replace: The failure of the three R’s and the future of animal experimentation (pp. 195–229). Chicago: University of Chicago Legal Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasper, J., Mumm, R., & Ruther, J. (2012). The composition of carcass volatile profiles in relation to storage time and climate conditions. Forensic Science International, 223, 64–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaw, A. N. U., Jones, D. G., & Zhang, M. (2016). The use of animal tissues alongside human tissue: Cultural and ethical considerations. Clinical Anatomy, 29, 19–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilkenny, C., Browne, W. J., Cuthill, I. C., Emerson, M., & Altman, D. G. (2010). Improving bioscience research reporting: The ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS Biology, 8(6), e1000412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolar, R. (2006). Animal experimentation. Science and Engineering Ethics, 12, 111–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krug, E. G., Dahlberg, L. L., Mercy, J. A., Zwi, A. B., & Lozano, R. (Eds.). (2002). World report on violence and health. Geneva: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurosu, M., Mukai, T., & Ohno, Y. (2003). Regulations and guidelines on handling human materials obtained from medico-legal autopsy for use in research. Legal Medicine, 5, S76–S78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liebenberg, J., du Toit-Prinsloo, L., Steenkamp, V., & Saayman, G. (2016). Fatalities involving illicit drug use in Pretoria, South Africa, for the period 2003–2012. South African Medical Journal, 106(10), 1051–1055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meurs, J. (2016). The experimental design of postmortem studies: The effect size and statistical power. Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology, 12, 343–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, B. (2013). The current status of laboratory animal ethics in South Africa. ATLA, 41, 48–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, B. J., Fakoya, F. A., Hau, J., Souilem, O., & Anestidou, L. (2016). The governance of animal care and use for scientific purposes in Africa and the Middle East. ILAR Journal, 57(3), 333–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, M. J. (2011). The institutional review board is an impediment to human research: The result is more animal-based research. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, 6, 12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rollin, B. E. (2006). The regulation of animal research and the emergence of animal ethics: A conceptual history. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 27, 285–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rougé-Maillart, C., Dupont, V., & Jousset, N. (2016). The problem with medical research on tissue and organ samples taken in connection with forensic autopsies in France. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine, 38, 6–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, W. M. S., & Burch, R. L. (1959). The principles of humane experimental technique. London: Metheun.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seedat, M., Van Niekerk, A., Jewkes, R., Suffla, S., & Ratele, K. (2009). Violence and injuries in South Africa: Prioritising an agenda for prevention. Lancet, 374, 1011–1022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sommer, J., Hinsberger, M., Elbert, T., Holtzhausen, L., Kaminer, D., Seedat, S., et al. (2017). The interplay between trauma, substance abuse and appetitive aggression and its relation to criminal activity among high-risk males in South Africa. Addictive Behaviors, 64, 29–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timoshanko, A. C., Marston, H., & Lidbury, B. A. (2016). Australian regulation of animal use in science and education: A critical appraisal. ILAR Journal, 57(3), 324–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tumer, A. R., Karacaoglu, E., Namli, A., Keten, A., Farasat, S., Akcan, R., et al. (2013). Effects of different types of soil on decomposition: An experimental study. Legal Medicine, 15, 149–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, P. V., Smiler, K. L., Hargaden, M., & Koch, M. A. (2003). Refinements in the care and use of animals in toxicology studies: Regulation, validation, and progress. Contemporary Topics in Laboratory Animal Science, 42(6), 8–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterhouse, K. (2013a). The effect of weather conditions on burnt bone fragmentation. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine, 20, 489–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waterhouse, K. (2013b). The effect of victim age on burnt bone fragmentation: Implications for remains recovery. Forensic Science International, 231, 409.e1–409.e7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zangarini, S., Trombino, L., & Cattaneo, C. (2016). Micromorphological and ultramicroscopic aspects of buried remains: Time-dependent markers of decomposition and permanence in soil in experimental burial. Forensic Science International, 263, 74–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, P.O. Box 13914, Mowbray, 7705, South Africa

    Calvin Gerald Mole & Marise Heyns

Authors
  1. Calvin Gerald Mole
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marise Heyns
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Calvin Gerald Mole.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mole, C.G., Heyns, M. Animal Models in Forensic Science Research: Justified Use or Ethical Exploitation?. Sci Eng Ethics 25, 1095–1110 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-018-0053-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-018-0053-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation