[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Uterine Transplant: A Risk to Life or a Chance for Life?

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Being inherently different from any other lifesaving organ transplant, uterine transplantation does not aim at saving lives but supporting the possibility to generate life. Unlike the kidneys or the liver, the uterus is not specifically a vital organ. Given the non-lifesaving nature of this procedure, questions have been raised about its feasibility. The ethical dilemma revolves around whether it is worth placing two lives at risk related to surgery and immunosuppression, amongst others, to enable a woman with absolute uterine factor infertility to experience the presence of an organ enabling childbirth. In the year 2000, the first uterine transplantation, albeit unsuccessful, was performed in Saudi Arabia from where it has spread to the rest of the world including Sweden, the United States and now recently India. The procedure is, however, still in the preclinical stages and several ethical, legal, social and religious concerns are yet to be addressed before it can be integrated into the clinical setting as standard of care for women with absolute uterine factor infertility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Appelbaum, P. S., Roth, L. H., Lidz, C. W., Benson, P., & Winslade, W. (1987). False hopes and best data: Consent to research and the therapeutic misconception. The Hastings Center Report, 17, 20–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arora, M. (2017). Mom donates womb to daughter in India’s first uterus transplant. CNN News. http://edition.cnn.com/2017/05/19/health/india-uterus-womb-transplant/index.html. Accessed 29 August 2017.

  • Brannstrom, M. (2015). Uterus transplantation. Current opinion in organ transplantation, 20, 621–628.

  • Brannstrom, M. (2017). Uterus transplantation and beyond. Journal of Materials Science Materials in Medicine, 28, 70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brannstrom, M., Bokstrom, H., Dahm-Kahler, P., Diaz-Garcia, C., Ekberg, J., Enskog, A., et al. (2016). One uterus bridging three generations: First live birth after mother-to-daughter uterus transplantation. Fertility and Sterility, 106, 261–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brannstrom, M., Johannesson, L., Bokstrom, H., Kvarnstrom, N., Molne, J., Dahm-Kahler, P., et al. (2015). Livebirth after uterus transplantation. Lancet, 385, 607–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brannstrom, M., Johannesson, L., Dahm-Kahler, P., Enskog, A., Molne, J., Kvarnstrom, N., et al. (2014). First clinical uterus transplantation trial: A six-month report. Fertility and Sterility, 101, 1228–1236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del Priore, G., & Gudipudi, D. K. (2014). Promise of uterine transplant–myth or a reality? Maturitas, 77, 20–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickens, B. M. (2016). Legal and ethical issues of uterus transplantation. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 133, 125–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Akouri, R. R., Kurlberg, G., Dindelegan, G., Molne, J., Wallin, A., & Bransstrom, M. (2002). Heterotopic uterine transplantation by vascular anastomosis in the mouse. Journal of Endocrinology, 174, 157–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enskog, A., Johannesson, L., Chai, D. C., Dahm-Kahler, P., Marcickiewicz, J., Nyachieo, A., et al. (2010). Uterus transplantation in the baboon: Methodology and long-term function after auto-transplantation. Human Reproduction, 25, 1980–1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fageeh, W., Raffa, H., Jabbad, H., & Marzouki, A. (2002). Transplantation of the human uterus. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 76, 245–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier, T., Garnault, D., Therme, J. F., Piver, P., Essig, M., Pichon, N., et al. (2015). Uterine transplantation: Is there a real demand? Gynecologie Obstetrique and Fertilite, 43, 133–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GBD 2015 Healthcare Access and Quality Collaborators. (2017). Healthcare access and quality index based on mortality from causes amenable to personal health care in 195 countries and territories, 1990–2015: A novel analysis from the global burden of disease study 2015. Lancet, 390, 231–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, F., O’Connell, C. D., Mladenovska, T., & Dodds, S. (2017). Print me an organ? Ethical and regulatory issues emerging from 3D bioprinting in medicine. Science and Engineering Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9874-6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isa, N. M. (2016). Darurah (necessity) and its application in Islamic ethical assessment of medical applications: A review on Malaysian Fatwa. Science and Engineering Ethics, 22, 1319–1332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johannesson, L., Enskog, A., Dahm-Kahler, P., Hanafy, A., Chai, D. C., Mwenda, J. M., et al. (2012). Uterus transplantation in a non-human primate: Long-term follow-up after autologous transplantation. Human Reproduction, 27, 1640–1648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johannesson, L., Enskog, A., Molne, J., Diaz-Garcia, C., Hanafy, A., Dahm-Kahler, P., et al. (2013). Pre-clinical report on allogeneic uterus transplantation in non-human primates. Human Reproduction, 28, 189–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi, Y., & Pandit, S. (2017). 21-year-old Pune woman gets mother’s womb in India’s first uterus transplant. Hindustan Times. http://www.hindustantimes.com/mumbai-news/21-year-old-pune-woman-gets-mother-s-womb-in-india-s-first-uterus-transplant/story-4jIBAKjxtx89So9VFdDEBJ.html. Accessed 29 August 2017.

  • Lavoue, V., Vigneau, C., Duros, S., Boudjema, K., Leveque, J., Piver, P., et al. (2017). Which donor for uterus transplants: Brain-dead donor or living donor? A systematic review. Transplantation, 101, 267–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lefkowitz, A., Edwards, M., & Balayla, J. (2012). The Montreal criteria for the ethical feasibility of uterine transplantation. Transplant International, 25, 439–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menezes, R. G., Bhagavath, P., & Adiga, P. K. (2007). Surrogacy in India. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine, 14, 307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milliez, J. (2009). Uterine transplantation FIGO committee for the ethical aspects of human reproduction and women’s health. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 106, 270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olausson, M., Johannesson, L., Brattgard, D., Diaz-Garcia, C., Lundmark, C., Groth, K., et al. (2014). Ethics of uterus transplantation with live donors. Fertility and Sterility, 102, 40–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrini, C., Gainotti, S., Morresi, A., & Costa, A. N. (2017). Ethical issues in uterine transplantation: Psychological implications and informed consent. Transplantation Proceedings, 49, 707–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tryphonopoulos, P., Tzakis, A. G., Tekin, A., Johannesson, L., Rivas, K., Morales, P. R., et al. (2014). Allogeneic uterus transplantation in baboons: Surgical technique and challenges to long-term graft survival. Transplantation, 98, e51–e56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wranning, C. A., El-Akouri, R. R., Lundmark, C., Dahm-Kahler, P., Molne, J., Enskog, A., et al. (2006). Auto-transplantation of the uterus in the domestic pig (Sus scrofa): Surgical technique and early reperfusion events. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, 32, 358–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wranning, C. A., Marcickiewicz, J., Enskog, A., Dahm-Kahler, P., Hanafy, A., & Brannstrom, M. (2010). Fertility after autologous ovine uterine–tubal–ovarian transplantation by vascular anastomosis to the external iliac vessels. Human Reproduction, 25, 1973–1979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ritesh G. Menezes.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Taneja, A., Das, S., Hussain, S.A. et al. Uterine Transplant: A Risk to Life or a Chance for Life?. Sci Eng Ethics 25, 635–642 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-018-0018-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-018-0018-4

Keywords

Navigation