Research Integrity and Everyday Practice of Science

• 2nd World Conference on Research Integrity. (2010). Singapore statement on research integrity, from http://www.singaporestatement.org/statement.html.

• American Society of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. (1998). Code of ethics, from http://ethics.iit.edu/ecodes/node/3898.

• Bernard, C. (1957). An introduction to the study of experimental medicine (1865). New York, NY: Dover Publications, Inc.

  Google Scholar 

• Billingham, R. E. (1974). Reminiscences of a “transplanter”. Transplantation Proceedings, 6, 5–17.

  Google Scholar 

• Conant, J. B. (1951). Science and common sense. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• de Solla Price, D. (1983). The science/technology relationship, the craft of experimental science, and policy for the improvement of high technology innovation. In National Science Foundation (Ed.), Role of basic research in science and technology. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

• DeHaan, R. L. (2011). Science education. Teaching creative science thinking. Science, 334, 1499–1500.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Etkina, E., Karelina, A., Ruibal-Villasenor, M., Rosengrant, D., Jordan, R., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2010). Design and reflection help students develop scientific abilities: Learning in introductory physics laboratories. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19, 54–98.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Feyerabend, P. (1975). Against method. New York: Verso.

  Google Scholar 

• Fleck, L. (1979). Genesis and development of a scientific fact (1935). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Goldstein, J. L. (2007). Creation and revelation: Two different routes to advancement in the biomedical sciences. Nature Medicine, 13, 1151–1154.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Goodstein, D. (2001). In the case of Robert Andrews Millikan. American Scientist, 89, 54–60.

  Google Scholar 

• Grinnell, F. (1992). The scientific attitude (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Grinnell, F. (2009). Everyday practice of science: Where intuition and passion meet objectivity and logic. New York: Oxford University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Hayes, W. (1982). Max Ludwig Henning Delbruck. Biographical Memoirs of the Fellows of the Royal Society, 28, 58–90.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Holton, G. (1973). Thematic origins of scientific thought: Kepler to Einstein. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Ioannidis, J. P. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine, 2, e124.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Jackson, C. I. (1984). Honor in science. New Haven, CT: Sigma Xi, The Scientific Research Society.

  Google Scholar 

• Jacob, F. (1988). The statue within. New York, NY: Basic Books Inc.

  Google Scholar 

• Jacob, F. (2011). The birth of the operon. Science, 332, 767.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• James, W. (1975). Pragmatism’s conception of truth (1907). In Pragmatism and the meaning of truth (pp. 95–113). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

• Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Kuhn, T. S. (1979). Objectivity, value judgement, and theory choice. In T. S. Kuhn (Ed.), The essential tension. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Levi-Montalcini, R. (1988). In praise of imperfection. New York, NY: Basic Books Inc.

  Google Scholar 

• Manoharan, J. (2011, 04/22/2011). Scientific misconduct starts early, from http://www.biotechniques.com/news/Scientific-misconduct-starts-early/biotechniques-314589.html.

• Martinson, B. C., Anderson, M. S., Crain, A. L., & de Vries, R. (2006). Scientists’ perceptions of organizational justice and self-reported misbehaviors. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 1, 51–66.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• McClintock, B. (1983). Nobel banquet speech—December 10, 1983. In T. Frängsmyr (Ed.), Les Prix Nobel. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.

  Google Scholar 

• Medawar, P. B. (1963). Is the scientific paper a fraud? The Listener (September 12), pp. 377–378.

• Medawar, P. B. (1968). Lucky Jim. The New York Review of Books, March 28, 1968.

• National Academies National Research Council. (2006). America’s lab report: Investigations in high school science. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

  Google Scholar 

• National Academies Panel on Scientific Responsibility and the Conduct of Research. (1992). Responsible science: Ensuring the integrity of the research process. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

  Google Scholar 

• National Academies—Institute of Medicine. (2002). Integrity in scientific research: Creating an environment that promotes responsible conduct. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

  Google Scholar 

• National Institutes of Health. (2011). Update on the requirement for instruction in the responsible conduct of research, from http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-10-019.html.

• National Science Foundation. (2010). Chapter IV—grantee standards; Part B. Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR), from http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/policydocs/pappguide/nsf10_1/aag_4.jsp.

• Peirce, C. P. (1958). Harvard lectures on pragmatism (1903). In C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss & A. Burks (Eds.), Collected papers of Charles sanders Peirce (Vols. 1–6, 5, pp. 188–189). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

• Piaget, J. (1970). Genetic epistemology (E. Duckworth, Trans.). New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Co.

• Plato. (380 B.C.E.). Meno 80 d-e, from http://classics.mit.edu/Plato/meno.html.

• Polanyi, M. (1983). The tacit dimension (1966). Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith Publishers.

  Google Scholar 

• Popper, K. R. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. New York, NY: Basic Books Inc.

  Google Scholar 

• President’s Science Advisory Committee. (1960). Scientific progress, the universities, and the federal government (President’s Science Advisory Committee). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

  Google Scholar 

• Roth, W.-M. (1994). Experimenting in the constructivist high school physics laboratory. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 197–223.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Schachman, H. K. (2006). From “publish or perish” to “patent and prosper”. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 281, 6889–6903.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Schilling, H. K. (1958). A human enterprise. Science, 127, 1324–1327.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Schutz, A. (1967). The phenomenology of the social world (G. Walsh & F. Lehnert, Trans.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern Univ. Press.

• Shore, B. M., Delcourt, M. A. B., Syer, C. A., & Schapiro, M. (2007). The phantom of the science fair. In B. M. Shore, M. W. Aulis, & M. A. B. Delcourt (Eds.), Inquiry in education, volume II: Overcoming barriers to successful implementation. New York, NY: Routledge.

  Google Scholar 

• The National Academies. (2003). Policy on committee composition and balance and conflicts of interest for committees used in the development of reports (May 12, 2003), from http://www.nationalacademies.org/coi/bi-coi_form-0.pdf.

• U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (1989). Requirement for programs on the responsible conduct of research in national research service award institutional training programs, from http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/historical/1989_12_22_Vol_18_No_45.pdf.

Download references