Abstract
Measurement of structural dynamics can be used for dynamic characterization, diagnostics, condition monitoring, analyzing sources of vibration problems, design optimization and, finally, as comparison data to improve computation results. Mainly for open surfaces in automotive and aerospace industries the modal testing is often performed using laser vibrometers. In the case of partially closed structures as machine tools, modal analyses comprises the three dimensional vibration measurements at up to several hundred points of the structure and is classically conducted using accelerometers. This paper presents a novel approach to perform modal analyses using a tracking-interferometer. The modal analysis is shortly introduced along with the two mentioned methods. Further, the functionality of tracking-interferometers is discussed as well as the basics for their application in dynamic measurement. One-dimensional measurements using a tracking interferometer are conducted and benchmarked against other devices. Three-dimensional measurements are presented including the necessary coordinate transformation. A small modal analysis is demonstrated. Finally, a measurement strategy for fast modal testing is suggested and additional functionalities required for the tracking interferometer are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ewins DJ (2000) Modal testing theory practice and application. Research Studies Press LTD, Baldock
Brecher C, Manoharan D, Ladra U, Köpken HG (2010) Chatter suppression with an active workpiece holder. Prod Eng Res Devel V4:239–245
Aurich JC, Biermann D, Blum H, Brecher C, Carstensen C, Denkena B, Klocke F, Kröger M, Steinmann P, Weinert K (2009) Modelling and simulation of process-machine interaction in grinding. Prod Eng Res Devel V3:111–120. doi:10.1007/s11740-008-0137-x
Brecher C, Weck M (2006) Werkzeugmaschinen, V5. Messtechnische Untersuchung und Beurteilung, dynamische Stabilität. Springer, Berlin
Oliver DE (2009) Tutorial: 3D scanning vibrometry for structural dynamics measurements. Presentation at the IMAC-XXVII: Conference & Exposition on Structural Dynamics, February 9–12 Orlando. http://www.sem.org/PDF/Oliver_3D%20Scanning%20Vibrometry.pdf. Accessed 20 April 2011
Pingle P, Sailhamer J, Avitabile P (2009) Comparison of 3D laser vibrometer and accelerometer frequency measurements. In: Proceedings of the IMAC-XXVII, February 9–12, Orlando, Florida, USA
Lau K, Hocken RJ, Haight WC (1986) Automatic laser tracking interferometer system for robot metrology. Prec Eng 8(1):3–8. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2003.10.071
Kniel K (2007) Ein Beitrag zur Entwicklung eines laserinterferometrischen Trackingsystems für die Genauigkeitssteigerung in der Koordinatenmesstechnik. Dissertation, Ilmenau University of Technology
Schmitt R, Jatzkowski P, Schwenke H, Warmann C (2009) Advances in the error mapping of machine tools and coordinate measurement machines (CMMs) by sequential multilateration. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference and exhibition on laser metrology, machine tool, CMM and robotic performance, LAMDAMAP 2009, June 30th–July 2nd 2009, Brunel University, West London, pp 452–461
Jatzkowski P (2011) Ressourceneffiziente Kalibrierung von 5-Achs-Werkzeugmaschinen mit tracking-interferometern. Dissertation, RWTH Aachen University
Acknowledgments
This research is carried out in the project ‘DynaTrac’ funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) within the Framework Concept “Research for Tomorrow’s Production” and managed by the Project Management Agency Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe, Production and Manufacturing Technologies Division (PTKA-PFT). The authors highly appreciate the support by Heinrich Schwenke and Mark Wissmann from etalon AG and Heiko Paluszek and Daniel Berk from sigma3D GmbH.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brecher, C., Guralnik, A. & Bäumler, S. Measurement of structure dynamics using a tracking-interferometer. Prod. Eng. Res. Devel. 6, 89–96 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-011-0352-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-011-0352-8