The effects of scarcity on consumer decision journeys

• Abrams, P. A. (1992). Keywords in evolutionary biology. In E. F. Keller & E. A. Lloyd (Eds.), Resource (pp. 282–285). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Ailawadi, K., & Neslin, S. (1998). The effect of promotion on consumption: buying more and consuming it faster. Journal of Marketing Research, 35, 390–398.

  Google Scholar 

• Andreasen, A. R. (1993). Revisiting the disadvantaged: old lessons and new problems. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 12, 270–275.

  Google Scholar 

• Arens, Z. G., & Hamilton, R. W. (2016). Why focusing on the similarity of substitutes leaves a lot to be desired. Journal of Consumer Research, 43, 448–459.

  Google Scholar 

• Arens, Z. G., & Hamilton, R. W. (2018). The substitution strategy dilemma: substitute selection vs. substitute effectiveness. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 46, 130–146.

  Google Scholar 

• Baker, S. M. (2009). Vulnerability and resilience in natural disasters: a marketing and public policy perspective. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 28, 114–123.

  Google Scholar 

• Balachander, S., & Stock, A. (2009). Limited edition products: when and when not to offer them. Marketing Science, 28, 336–355.

  Google Scholar 

• Bellezza, S., Paharia, N., & Keinan, A. (2017). Conspicuous consumption of time: when busyness and lack of leisure time become a status symbol. Journal of Consumer Research, 44, 118–138.

  Google Scholar 

• Bertrand, M., & Morse, A. (2011). Information disclosure, cognitive biases, and payday borrowing. Journal of Finance, 66, 1865–1893.

  Google Scholar 

• Binkley, J. K., & Bejnarowicz, J. (2003). Consumer price awareness in food shopping: the case of quantity surcharges. Journal of Retailing, 79, 27–35.

  Google Scholar 

• Blattberg, R., Beusing, T., Peacock, P., & Sen, S. (1978). Identifying the deal-prone segment. Journal of Marketing Research, 15, 369–377.

  Google Scholar 

• Bolger, K. E., Patterson, C. J., Thompson, W. W., & Kupersmidt, J. B. (1995). Psychosocial adjustment among children experiencing persistent and intermittent family economic hardship. Child Development, 66, 1107–1129.

  Google Scholar 

• Bone, S. A., Christensen, G. L., & Williams, J. D. (2014). Rejected, shackled, and alone: the impact of systemic restricted choice on minority consumers’ construction of self. Journal of Consumer Research, 41, 451–474.

  Google Scholar 

• Botti, S., Broniarczyk, S., Häubl, G., Hill, R., Huang, Y., Kahn, B., Kopalle, P., Lehmann, D., Urbany, J., & Wansink, B. (2008). Choice under restrictions. Marketing Letters, 19, 183–199.

  Google Scholar 

• Brannon, L. A., & Brock, T. C. (2001). Scarcity claims elicit extreme responding to persuasive messages: role of cognitive elaboration. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 365–375.

  Google Scholar 

• Brehm, J. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. New York: Academic Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Brock, T. C. (1968). Implications of commodity theory for value change. In A. G. Greenwald, T. C. Brock, & T. M. Ostrom (Eds.), Psychological foundations of attitudes (pp. 243–276). New York: Academic.

  Google Scholar 

• Campbell, W. K., Bonacci, A. M., Shelton, J., Exline, J. J., & Bushman, B. J. (2004). Psychological entitlement: interpersonal consequences and validation of a self-report measure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 83, 29–45.

  Google Scholar 

• Cannon, C., Goldsmith, K., & Roux, C. (2018). A self-regulatory model of resource scarcity. Journal of Consumer Psychology, forthcoming.

• Chaplin, L. N., & John, D. R. (2007). Growing up in a material world: age differences in materialism in children and adolescents. Journal of Consumer Research, 34, 480–493.

  Google Scholar 

• Chaplin, L. N., & John, D. R. (2010). Interpersonal influences on adolescent materialism: a new look at the role of parents and peers. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20, 176–184.

  Google Scholar 

• Chaplin, L. N., Hill, R. P., & John, D. R. (2014). Poverty and materialism: a look at impoverished versus affluent children. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 33, 78–92.

  Google Scholar 

• Cialdini, R. B. (1993). Influence: The psychology of persuasion. New York: HarperCollins.

  Google Scholar 

• Court, D., Elzinga, D., Mulder, S., & Vetvik, O. J. (2009). The consumer decision journey. McKinsey Quarterly, 1, 1–11.

  Google Scholar 

• Cunha, D. (2016). The divorce gap. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2016/04/the-divorce-gap/480333/.

• Dai, X., Wertenbroch, K., & Brendl, M. (2008). The value heuristic in judgments of relative frequency. Psychological Science, 19, 18–19.

  Google Scholar 

• Ding, Y., Wu, J., Ji, T., Chen, X., & Van Lange, P. A. (2017). The rich are easily offended by unfairness: wealth triggers spiteful rejection of unfair offers. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 71, 138–144.

  Google Scholar 

• Ellis, B. J., Figueredo, A. J., Brumbach, B. H., & Schlomer, G. L. (2009). Fundamental dimensions of environmental risk. Human Nature, 20, 204–268.

  Google Scholar 

• Fitzsimons. (2000). Consumer response to stockouts. Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 249–266.

  Google Scholar 

• Folkes, V. S., Martin, I. M., & Gupta, K. (1993). When to say when: effects of supply on usage. Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 467–477.

  Google Scholar 

• Frederick, S., Novemsky, N., Wang, J., Dhar, R., & Nowlis, S. (2009). Opportunity cost neglect. Journal of Consumer Research, 36, 553–561.

  Google Scholar 

• Gierl, H., & Huettl, V. (2010). Are scarce products always more attractive? The interaction of different types of scarcity signals with products' suitability for conspicuous consumption. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 27, 225–235.

  Google Scholar 

• Goldin, J., & Homonoff, T. (2013). Smoke gets in your eyes: cigarette tax salience and regressivity. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 5, 302–336.

  Google Scholar 

• Goldsmith, K., Newman, G. E., & Dhar, R. (2016). Mental representation changes the evaluation of green product benefits. Nature Climate Change, 6, 847.

  Google Scholar 

• Grier, S., & Davis, B. (2013). Are all proximity effects created equal? Fast food near schools and body weight among diverse adolescents. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 32, 116–128.

  Google Scholar 

• Griskevicius, V., Goldstein, N., Mortensen, C., Sundie, J., Ciadini, R., & Kenrick, D. (2009). Fear and loving in Las Vegas: Evolution, emotion, and persuasion. Journal of Marketing Research, 46, 384–395.

  Google Scholar 

• Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., Delton, A. W., & Robertson, T. E. (2011). The influence of mortality and socioeconomic status on risk and delayed rewards: a life history theory approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 1015–1026.

  Google Scholar 

• Griskevicius, V., Ackerman, J. M., Cantu, S. M., Delton, A. W., Robertson, T. E., Simpson, J. A., Thompson, M. E., & Tybur, J. M. (2013). When the economy falters, do people spend or save? Responses to resource scarcity depend on childhood environments. Psychological Science, 24, 197–205.

  Google Scholar 

• Hamilton, R. W., Thompson, D. V., Arens, Z. G., Blanchard, S. J., Haubl, G., Kannan, P. K., Khan, U., Lehmann, D. R., Meloy, M., Roese, N. J., & Thomas, M. (2014). Consumer substitution decisions: an integrative framework. Marketing Letters, 25, 305–317.

  Google Scholar 

• Hart, K. (2018). Facebook patent tries to guess users' socioeconomic status. Axios, https://www.axios.com/facebook-patent-predicts-class-62361497-1135-494f-89d8-612e6d13b53d.html, retrieved Feb. 13, 2018.

• Hill, R. P. (2001). Surviving in a material world: The lived experience of people in poverty. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Hill, R. P. (2010). A naturological approach to marketing exchange: implications for the bottom of the pyramid. Journal of Business Research, 63, 62–67.

  Google Scholar 

• Hill, R. P., & Martin, K. D. (2012). Absolute and relative restriction and consumer behavior: implication for understanding global consumption. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 46, 37–61.

  Google Scholar 

• Hill, R. P., & Martin, K. L. (2014). Broadening the paradigm of marketing as exchange: a public policy and marketing perspective. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 33, 17–33.

  Google Scholar 

• Hill, R. P., Ramp, D. L., & Silver, L. (1998). The rent-to-own industry and pricing disclosure tactics. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 17, 3–10.

  Google Scholar 

• Hill, S. E., Rodeheffer, C. D., Griskevicius, V., Durante, K., & White, A. E. (2012). Boosting beauty in an economic decline: mating, spending, and the lipstick effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 275–291.

  Google Scholar 

• Hill, R. P., Cunningham, D., & the Gramercy Gentlemen. (2016a). Dehumanization and restriction inside a maximum security prison: novel insights about consumer acquisition and ownership. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 1, 295–313.

  Google Scholar 

• Hill, S. E., Prokosch, M. L., DelPriore, D. J., Griskevicius, V., & Kramer, A. (2016b). Low childhood socioeconomic status promotes eating in the absence of energy need. Psychological Science, 27, 354–364.

  Google Scholar 

• Hoch, S., Kim, B., Montgomery, A., & Rossi, P. (1995). Store-level price elasticity. Journal of Marketing Research, 22, 17–29.

  Google Scholar 

• Howard, D. J., Shu, S. B., & Kerin, R. A. (2007). Reference price and scarcity appeals and the use of multiple influence strategies in retail newspaper advertising. Social Influence, 2, 18–28.

  Google Scholar 

• Inman, J. J., Peter, A. C., & Raghubir, P. (1997). Framing the deal: the role of restrictions in accentuating deal value. Journal of Consumer Research, 24, 68–79.

  Google Scholar 

• Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. A. (2000). When choice is demotivating: can one desire too much of a good thing? Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 79, 995–1006.

  Google Scholar 

• Johnson, W., & Krueger, R. F. (2006). How money buys happiness: genetic and environmental processes linking finances and life satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 680–691.

  Google Scholar 

• Karlan, D., McConnell, M., Mullainanthan, S., & Zinman, J. (2016). Getting to the top of mind: how reminders increase saving. Management Science, 62, 3393–3411.

  Google Scholar 

• Karlan, D., Mullainathan, S., & Roth, B. (2018), Debt traps? Market vendors and moneylender debt in India and the Philippines. NBER working paper (https://www.nber.org/papers/w24272).

• Kraus, M. W., & Callaghan, B. (2016). Social class and prosocial behavior: the moderating role of public versus private contexts. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7, 769–777.

  Google Scholar 

• Kraus, M. W., Piff, P. K., & Keltner, D. (2009). Social class, sense of control, and social explanation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 992–1004.

  Google Scholar 

• Kristofferson, K., McFerran, B., Morales, A. C., & Dahl, D. W. (2017). The dark side of scarcity promotions: how exposure to limited-quantity promotions can induce aggression. Journal of Consumer Research, 43, 683–706.

  Google Scholar 

• Kurtz, J. L. (2008). Looking to the future to appreciate the present: the benefits of perceived temporal scarcity. Psychological Science, 19, 1238–1241.

  Google Scholar 

• Laran, J., & Salerno, A. (2013). Life-history strategy, food choice, and caloric consumption. Psychological Science, 24, 167–173.

  Google Scholar 

• Lareau, A. (2002). Invisible inequality: social class and childrearing in black families and white families. American Sociological Review, 67, 747–776.

  Google Scholar 

• Lynn, M. (1991). Scarcity effects on value: a quantitative review of the commodity theory literature. Psychology & Marketing, 8, 43–57.

  Google Scholar 

• Markus, H. R., & Conner, A. (2013). Clash: 8 cultural conflicts that make us who we are. New York: Hudson Street Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Martin, K., & Paul Hill, R. (2012). Life Satisfaction, Self-Determination, and Consumption Adequacy at the Bottom of the Pyramid. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(6), 1155-1168

• Martin, K. D., & Hill, R. P. (2015). Saving and wellbeing at the base of the pyramid: implications for transformative financial services delivery. Journal of Service Research, 18, 405–421.

  Google Scholar 

• McLanahan, S. S., & Booth, K. (1989). Mother-only families: problems, prospects, and politics. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 557–580.

  Google Scholar 

• Mehta, R., & Zhu, M. (2016). Creating when you have less: the impact of resource scarcity on product use creativity. Journal of Consumer Research, 42, 767–782.

  Google Scholar 

• Mende, M., Scott, M. L., Bitner, M. J., & Ostrom, A. O. (2017). Activating consumers for better service coproduction outcomes through eustress: the interplay of firm-assigned workload, service literacy, and organizational support. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 36, 137–155.

  Google Scholar 

• Miller, J. G., Kahle, S., & Hastings, P. D. (2015). Roots and benefits of costly giving: children who are more altruistic have greater autonomic flexibility and less family wealth. Psychological Science, 26, 1038–1045.

  Google Scholar 

• Mischel, W. (2014). The marshmallow test: Why self-control is the engine of success. New York: Little, Brown and Company.

  Google Scholar 

• Mittal, C., & Griskevicius, V. (2014). Sense of control under uncertainty depends on people’s childhood environment: a life history theory approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 621–637.

  Google Scholar 

• Mittal, C., & Griskevicius, V. (2016). Silver spoons and platinum plans: how childhood environment affects adult health care decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 43, 636–656.

  Google Scholar 

• Molden, D. C., Ming Hui, C., Scholer, A. A., Meier, B. P., Noreen, E. E., D’Agostino, P. R., & Martin, V. (2012). Motivational versus metabolic effects of carbohydrates on self-control. Pyschological Science, 23, 1137–1144.

  Google Scholar 

• Monga, A., May, F., & Bagchi, R. (2017). Eliciting time versus money: time scarcity underlies asymmetric wage rates. Journal of Consumer Research, 44, 833–852.

  Google Scholar 

• Mullainathan, S., & Shafir, E. (2013). Scarcity: Why having too little means so much. New York: Henry Holt.

  Google Scholar 

• O’Guinn, T. C., Tanner, R., & Maeng, A. (2014). Turning to space: social density, social class and the value of things in stores. Journal of Consumer Research, 42, 196–213.

  Google Scholar 

• Ozanne, J. L., Hill, R. P., & Wright, N. D. (1998). Juvenile delinquents’ use of consumption as cultural resistance: implications for juvenile reform programs and public policy. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 17, 185–196.

  Google Scholar 

• Parker, J. R., & Lehmann, D. R. (2011). When shelf-based scarcity impacts consumer preferences. Journal of Retailing, 87, 142–155.

  Google Scholar 

• Piff, P. K. (2014). Wealth and the inflated self: class, entitlement, and narcissism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 34–43.

  Google Scholar 

• Piff, P. K., Kraus, M. W., Côté, S., Cheng, B. H., & Keltner, D. (2010). Having less, giving more: the influence of social class on prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 771–784.

  Google Scholar 

• Piff, P. K., Stancato, D. M., Côté, S., Mendoza-Denton, R., & Keltner, D. (2012). Higher social class predicts increased unethical behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 4086–4091.

  Google Scholar 

• Quoidbach, J., Dunn, E. W., Hansenne, M., & Bustin, G. (2015). The price of abundance: how a wealth of experiences impoverishes savoring. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 393–404.

  Google Scholar 

• Ratneshwar, S., & Shocker, A. D. (1991). Substitution in use and the role of usage context in product category structures. Journal of Marketing Research, 28, 281–295.

  Google Scholar 

• Richards, J. I., & Preston, I. L. (1992). Proving and disproving materiality of deceptive advertising claims. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 11, 45–56.

  Google Scholar 

• Richins, M., & Dawson, S. (1992). A consumer values orientation for materialism and its measurement: scale development and validation. Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 303–316.

  Google Scholar 

• Rindfleisch, A., Burroughs, J. E., & Denton, F. (1997). Family structure, materialism, and compulsive consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 23, 312–325.

  Google Scholar 

• Rosa, J. A., Geiger-Oneto, S., & Fajardo, A. B. (2012). Hope and innovativeness: transformative factors for subsistence consumer-merchants. In Transformative Consumer Research for Personal and Collective Well-Being, eds. David, Glen M., Simone Pettigrew, Cornelia Pechmann and Julie L. Ozanne, New York, NY: Routledge, 151–70.

• Roux, C., Goldsmith, K., & Bonezzi, A. (2015). On the psychology of scarcity: when reminders of resource scarcity promote selfish (and generous) behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 42, 615–631.

  Google Scholar 

• Roy, R., & Sharma, P. (2015). Scarcity appeal in advertising: exploring the moderating roles of need for uniqueness and message framing. Journal of Advertising, 44, 349–359.

  Google Scholar 

• Sanbonmatsu, D. M., & Kardes, F. R. (1988). The effects of physiological arousal on information processing and persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 379–385.

  Google Scholar 

• Sevilla, J., & Redden, J. P. (2014). Limited availability reduces the rate of satiation. Journal of Marketing Research, 51, 205–217.

  Google Scholar 

• Shaddy, F., & Shah, A. (forthcoming). Deciding who gets what, fairly. Journal of Consumer Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucy029.

• Shah, A. K., Mullainathan, S., & Shafir, E. (2012). Some consequences of having too little. Science, 338, 682–685.

  Google Scholar 

• Shah, A. K., Shafir, E., & Mullainathan, S. (2015). Scarcity frames value. Psychological Science, 26, 402–412.

  Google Scholar 

• Sharma, E., & Alter, A. L. (2012). Financial deprivation prompts consumers to seek scarce goods. Journal of Consumer Research., 39(3), 545–560.

  Google Scholar 

• Snibbe, A. C., & Markus, H. R. (2005). You can't always get what you want: educational attainment, agency, and choice. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 88, 703–720.

  Google Scholar 

• Spiller, S. A. (2011). Opportunity cost consideration. Journal of Consumer Research, 38, 595–610.

  Google Scholar 

• Stephens, N. M., Markus, H. R., & Townsend, S. S. (2007). Choice as an act of meaning: The case of social class. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 814–830.

  Google Scholar 

• Stephens, N. M., Cameron, J. S., & Townsend, S. S. M. (2014). Lower social class does not (always) mean greater interdependence: women in poverty have fewer social resources than working class women. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 45, 1061–1073.

  Google Scholar 

• Suri, R., Kohli, C., & Monroe, K. B. (2007). The effects of perceived scarcity on consumers’ processing of price information. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 35, 89–100.

  Google Scholar 

• Thaler, R. (1985). Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Science, 4, 199–214.

  Google Scholar 

• Thompson, D. V., Hamilton, R., & Banerji, I (2018). You can’t always get what you want: The effect of childhood scarcity on substitution decisions. Working paper, Georgetown University.

• Tully, S., Hershfield, H., & Meyvis, T. (2015). Seeking lasting enjoyment with limited money: financial constraints increase preference for material goods over experiences. Journal of Consumer Research, 42, 59–75.

  Google Scholar 

• Van Herpen, E., Pieters, F. G. M., & Zeelenberg, M. (2009). When demand accelerates demand: trailing the bandwagon. Journal of Consumer Psychology., 19, 302–312.

  Google Scholar 

• Viswanathan, M., Rosa, J. A., & Ruth, J. A. (2010). Exchanges in marketing systems: the case of subsistence consumer–merchants in Chennai, India. Journal of Marketing, 74, 1–17.

  Google Scholar 

• Wentzel, J. P., Diatha, K. S., & Yadavalli, V. S. S. (2013). An application of the extended technology acceptance model in understanding technology-enabled financial service adoption in South Africa. Development Southern Africa, 30, 659–673.

  Google Scholar 

• Wertenbroch, K. (1998). Consumption self-control by rationing purchase quantities of virtue and vice. Marketing Science, 17, 317–337.

  Google Scholar 

• Whillans, A. V., Caruso, E. M., & Dunn, E. W. (2017). Both selfishness and selflessness start with the self: how wealth shapes responses to charitable appeals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 70, 242–250.

  Google Scholar 

• Wu, L., & Lee, C. (2016). Limited edition for me and best seller for you: the impact of scarcity versus popularity cues on self vs. other-purchase behavior. Journal of Retailing, 92, 486–499.

  Google Scholar 

• Zhu, M., & Ratner, R. K. (2015). Scarcity polarizes preferences: the impact on choice among multiple items in a product class. Journal of Marketing Research, 52, 13–26.

  Google Scholar 

• Zhu, M., Yang, Y., & Hsee, C. (2018). The mere urgency effect. Journal of Consumer Research, 45, 673–690.

  Google Scholar 

Download references