Oil sands extraction plant debottlenecking: an optimization approach

1. Harsh, M.G., Saderne, P., Biegler, L.T.: A mixed integer flowsheet optimization strategy for process retrofits the debottlenecking problem. Comput. Chem. Eng. 13(8), 947–957 (1989)

   Article  Google Scholar 

2. Diaz, S., Serrani, A., De Beistegui, R., Brignole, E.A.: A MINLP strategy for the debottlenecking problem in an ethane extraction plant. Comput. Chem. Eng. 19, 175–180 (1995)

   Article  Google Scholar 

3. Litzen, D.B., Bravo, J.L.: Uncover low-cost debottlenecking opportunities. Chem. Eng. Process 95(3), 25–32 (1999)

   Google Scholar 

4. Zhang, J., Zhu, X.X., Towler, G.P.: A level-by-level debottlenecking approach in refinery operation. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 40(6), 1528–1540 (2001)

   Article  Google Scholar 

5. Al-Thubaiti, M.M., Al-Azri, N.A., El-Halwagi, M.M.: Integrated techniques for low-cost process debottlenecking. Hydrocarb. Process. 86(9), 161–161 (2007)

   Google Scholar 

6. Koulouris, A., Calandranis, J., Petrides, D.P.: Throughput analysis and debottlenecking of integrated batch chemical processes. Comput. Chem. Eng. 24(2), 1387–1394 (2000)

   Article  Google Scholar 

7. Tan, J., Foo, D.C.Y., Kumaresan, S., Aziz, R.A.: Debottlenecking of a batch pharmaceutical cream production. Pharm. Eng. 26(4), 72 (2006)

   Google Scholar 

8. Tan, R., Lam, H., Kasivisvanathan, H., Ng, D., Foo, D.D.C.Y., Kamal, M., Kleme, J.: An algebraic approach to identifying bottlenecks in linear process models of multifunctional energy systems. Theor. Found. Chem. Eng. 46(6), 642–650 (2012)

   Article  Google Scholar 

9. Kasivisvanathan, H., Tan, R.R., Ng, D.K., Aziz, M.K.A., Foo, D.C.: Heuristic framework for the debottlenecking of a palm oil-based integrated biorefinery. Chem. Eng. Res. Design 92(11), 2071–2082 (2014)

   Article  Google Scholar 

10. Key oilsands projects. Canadian Oilsands Navigator. Oilsands Review (2015). Web. 23 Feb 2015. http://navigator.oilsandsreview.com/listing

11. TOTAL E&P Joslyn Ltd, Joslyn north mine project AI project update section 5: process (2010)

12. Hugo, A., Pistikopoulos, S.: Long-range process planning under uncertainty via parametric programming. Comput. Aided Chem. Eng. 20, 127–132 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

13. Li, Z., Ierapetritou, M.G.: Process scheduling under uncertainty using parametric programming. AIChE J. 53(12), 3183–3203 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

14. Caballero, J.A., Grossmann, I.E.: An algorithm for the use of surrogate models in modular flowsheet optimization. AIChE J. 54(10), 2633–2650 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

15. Boukouvala, F., Ierapetritou, M.G.: Surrogate-based optimization of expensive flowsheet modeling for continuous pharmaceutical manufacturing. J. Pharm. Innov. 8(2), 131–145 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

16. Chu, Y., You, F.: Integrated planning, scheduling, and dynamic optimization for batch processes: MINLP model formulation and efficient solution methods via surrogate modeling. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 53(34), 13391–13411 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

17. Li, J., Xiao, X., Boukouvala, F., Floudas, C.A., Zhao, B., Du, G., Liu, H.: Data driven mathematical modeling and global optimization framework for entire petrochemical planning operations. AIChE J. 62(9), 3020–3040 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

18. Rasmussen, C.E., Williams, C.K.: Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning. MIT press, Cambridge (2006)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

19. Jones, D.R., Schonlau, M., Welch, W.J.: Efficient global optimization of expensive black-box functions. J. Glob. Optim. 13(4), 455–492 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references