Abstract
The cell formation problem (CFP) consists in an optimal grouping of the given machines and parts into cells, so that machines in every cell process as much as possible parts from this cell (intra-cell operations) and as less as possible parts from other cells (inter-cell operations). The grouping efficacy is the objective function for the CFP which simultaneously maximizes the number of intra-cell operations and minimizes the number of inter-cell operations. Currently there are no exact approaches (known to the authors) suggested for solving the CFP with the grouping efficacy objective. The only exact model which solves the CFP in a restricted formulation is due to Elbenani and Ferland (Cell formation problem solved exactly with the dinkelbach algorithm. Montreal. Quebec. CIRRELT-2012-07, 1–14, 2012). The restriction consists in fixing the number of production cells. The main difficulty of the CFP is the fractional objective function—the grouping efficacy. In this paper we address this issue for the CFP in its common formulation with a variable number of cells. Our computational experiments are made for the most popular set of 35 benchmark instances. For the 14 of these instances using CPLEX software we prove that the best known solutions are exact global optimums.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Askin, R.G., Subramanian, S.P.: A cost-based heuristic for group technology configuration. Int. J. Prod. Res. 25(1), 101–113 (1987)
Boctor, F.F.: A linear formulation of the machine-part cell formation problem. Int. J. Prod. Res. 29(2), 343–356 (1991)
Boe, W., Cheng, C.H.: A close neighbor algorithm for designing cellular manufacturing systems. Int. J. Prod. Res. 29(10), 2097–2116 (1991)
Carrie, S.: Numerical taxonomy applied to group technology and plant layout. Int. J. Prod. Res. 11, 399–416 (1973)
Chan, H.M., Milner, D.A.: Direct clustering algorithm for group formation in cellular manufacture. J. Manuf. Syst. 1(1), 64–76 (1982)
Chandrasekharan, M.P., Rajagopalan, R.: MODROC: an extension of rank order clustering for group technology. Int. J. Prod. Res. 24(5), 1221–1233 (1986a)
Chandrasekharan, M.P., Rajagopalan, R.: An ideal seed non-hierarchical clustering algorithm for cellular manufacturing. Int. J. Prod. Res. 24(2), 451–464 (1986b)
Chandrasekharan, M.P., Rajagopalan, R.: ZODIAC: an algorithm for concurrent formation of part families and machine cells. Int. J. Prod. Res. 25(6), 835–850 (1987)
Chandrasekharan, M.P., Rajagopalan, R.: Groupability: analysis of the properties of binary data matrices for group technology. Int. J. Prod. Res. 27(6), 1035–1052 (1989)
Elbenani, B., Ferland, J.A.: Cell Formation Problem Solved Exactly with the Dinkelbach Algorithm. Montreal. Quebec. CIRRELT-2012-07, pp. 1–14 (2012)
Ghosh, S., Mahanti, A., Nagi, R., Nau, D.S.: Manufacturing cell formation by state-space search. Ann. Oper. Res. 65(1), 35–54 (1996)
Goncalves, J.F., Resende, M.G.C.: An evolutionary algorithm for manufacturing cell formation. Comput. Ind. Eng. 47, 247–273 (2004)
James, T.L., Brown, E.C., Keeling, K.B.: A hybrid grouping genetic algorithm for the cell formation problem. Comput. Oper. Res. 34(7), 2059–2079 (2007)
King, J.R.: Machine-component grouping in production flow analysis: an approach using a rank order clustering algorithm. Int. J. Prod. Res. 18(2), 213–232 (1980)
King, J.R., Nakornchai, V.: Machine-component group formation in group technology: review and extension. Int. J. Prod. Res. 20(2), 117–133 (1982)
Kumar, K.R., Kusiak, A., Vannelli, A.: Grouping of parts and components in flexible manufacturing systems. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 24, 387–397 (1986)
Kumar, K.R., Chandrasekharan, M.P.: Grouping efficacy: a quantitative criterion for goodness of block diagonal forms of binary matrices in group technology. Int. J. Prod. Res. 28(2), 233–243 (1990)
Kumar, K.R., Vannelli, A.: Strategic subcontracting for efficient disaggregated manufacturing. Int. J. Prod. Res. 25(12), 1715–1728 (1987)
Kusiak, A.: The generalized group technology concept. Int. J. Prod. Res. 25(4), 561–569 (1987)
Kusiak, A., Chow, W.S.: Efficient solving of the group technology problem. J. Manuf. Syst. 6(2), 117–124 (1987)
McCormick, W.T., Schweitzer, P.J., White, T.W.: Problem decomposition and data reorganization by a clustering technique. Oper. Res. 20(5), 993–1009 (1972)
Mosier, C.T., Taube, L.: The facets of group technology and their impact on implementation. OMEGA 13(6), 381–391 (1985a)
Mosier, C.T., Taube, L.: Weighted similarity measure heuristics for the group technology machine clustering problem. OMEGA 13(6), 577–583 (1985b)
Paydar, M.M., Saidi-Mehrabad, M.: A hybrid genetic-variable neighborhood search algorithm for the cell formation problem based on grouping efficacy. Comput. Oper. Res. 40(4), 980–990 (2013)
Seifoddini, H.: A note on the similarity coefficient method and the problem of improper machine assignment in group technology applications. Int. J. Prod. Res. 27(7), 1161–1165 (1989)
Seifoddini, H., Wolfe, P.M.: Application of the similarity coefficient method in group technology. IIE Trans. 18(3), 271–277 (1986)
Srinivasan, G., Narendran, T.T., Mahadevan, B.: An assignment model for the part-families problem in group technology. Int. J. Prod. Res. 28(1), 145–152 (1990)
Stanfel, L.: Machine clustering for economic production. Eng. Costs Prod. Econ. 9, 73–81 (1985)
Waghodekar, P.H., Sahu, S.: Machine-component cell formation in group technology MACE. Int. J. Prod. Res. 22, 937–948 (1984)
Acknowledgments
The authors are partially supported by LATNA Laboratory, NRU HSE, RF government grant, ag. 11.G34.31.0057.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bychkov, I., Batsyn, M. & Pardalos, P.M. Exact model for the cell formation problem. Optim Lett 8, 2203–2210 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11590-014-0728-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11590-014-0728-8