[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Evolutionistic or revolutionary paths? A PACS maturity model for strategic situational planning

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

While many hospitals are re-evaluating their current Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS), few have a mature strategy for PACS deployment. Furthermore, strategies for implementation, strategic and situational planning methods for the evolution of PACS maturity are scarce in the scientific literature. Consequently, in this paper we propose a strategic planning method for PACS deployment. This method builds upon a PACS maturity model (PMM), based on the elaboration of the strategic alignment concept and the maturity growth path concept previously developed in the PACS domain.

Methods

First, we review the literature on strategic planning for information systems and information technology and PACS maturity. Secondly, the PMM is extended by applying four different strategic perspectives of the Strategic Alignment Framework whereupon two types of growth paths (evolutionistic and revolutionary) are applied that focus on a roadmap for PMM. This roadmap builds a path to get from one level of maturity and evolve to the next.

Results

An extended method for PACS strategic planning is developed. This method defines eight distinctive strategies for PACS strategic situational planning that allow decision-makers in hospitals to decide which approach best suits their hospitals’ current situation and future ambition and what in principle is needed to evolve through the different maturity levels.

Conclusions

The proposed method allows hospitals to strategically plan for PACS maturation. It is situational in that the required investments and activities depend on the alignment between the hospital strategy and the selected growth path. The inclusion of both strategic alignment and maturity growth path concepts make the planning method rigorous, and provide a framework for further empirical research and clinical practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bick U, Lenzen H (1999) PACS: the silent revolution. Eur Radiol 9: 1152–1160

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Huang HK (2006) PACS is only in the beginning of being used as a clinical research tool. In: The 24th international EuroPACS conference. Trondheim, Norway, pp 1–10

  3. Pilling JR (2003) Picture archiving and communication systems: the users’ view. Br J Radiol 76(908): 519–524

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fridell K et al (2007) The impact of PACS on radiologists’ work practice. J Digit Imaging 20(4): 411–421

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cheung N-T et al (2005) Integrating images into the electronic patient record of the hospital authority of Hong Kong. Comput Med Imaging Graph 29: 137–142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bandon DB et al (2004) Building an enterprise-wide PACS for all diagnostic images. Int Congr Ser 1268: 279–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Huang HK (2004) PACS and imaging informatics: basic principles and applications. Wiley, Hoboken

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Buccoliero L et al (2009) Picture, archiving and communication system in the Italian NHS: a primer on diffusion and evaluation analysis. J Digit Imaging 22(1): 34–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Morin RL, Cecil RA (2006) PACS archiving: a multivariate problem and solution. J Am Coll Radiol 3(1): 69–73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Quiles J et al (2005) Technical considerations for multimodality clinical workstations in a Hospital PACS project. Int Congr Ser 1281: 1010–1015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Andriole KP, Khorasani R (2007) Implementing a replacement PACS: issues to consider. J Am Coll Radiol 4(6): 416–418

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Khorasani R (2005) You need a prenuptial agreement in your PACS contract: here is why. J Am Coll Radiol 2(2): 196–197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Diamond D, Wasilewski D (2000) Purchasing strategies: go beyond financials in making case for PACS. Diagn Imaging (San Franc) Feb (suppl):27–32

  14. Hruby W (2002) Digital radiology: a decade of clinical experience. J HK Coll Radiol 5: 3–13

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cohen MD et al (2005) Planning for PACS: a comprehensive guide to nontechnical considerations. J Am Coll Radiol 2(4): 327–337

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hood M, Scott H (2006) Introduction to picture archive and communication systems. Radiol Nurs 25(3): 69–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chan S (2002) The importance of strategy for the evolving field of radiology. Radiology 224(3): 639–648

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hayt DB et al (2001) Filmless in 60 days: the impact of picture archiving and communication systems within a large urban hospital. J Dig Imaging 14(2): 62–71

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Chaudhry B et al (2006) Systematic review: impact of health information Technology on Quality, Efficiency and Costs of Medical Care. Ann Inter Med 144(10): 742–752

    Google Scholar 

  20. Siegel EL, Reiner B (2003) Filmless radiology at the Baltimore VA medical center: a 9 year retrospective. Comput Med Imaging Graph 27: 101–109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Dayhoff RE (1998) VA’s integrated imaging system: a multispecialty, hospital-wide image storage, retrieval, and communication system. In: Siegel Eliot L, Kolodner RM (eds) Filmless radiology. Springer, New York, pp 370–386

    Google Scholar 

  22. Levine LA et al (2006) PACS strategic plan and needs assessment. In: Dreyer KJ et al (eds) PACS: a guide to the digital revolution. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  23. Reiner BI, Siegel EL (2002) The cutting edge: strategies to enhance radiologist workflow in a filmless/paperless imaging department. J Digit Imaging 15(3): 178–190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Van de Wetering R, Batenburg RS (2009) A PACS maturity model: a systematic meta-analytic review on maturation and evolvability of PACS in the hospital enterprise. Int J Med Inform 78(2): 127–140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Gibson CF, Nolan RL (1974) Managing the four stages of EDP growth. Harv Bus Rev 52(1): 76–88

    Google Scholar 

  26. Nolan RL (1973) Managing the computer resource: a stage hypothesis. Commun Assoc Comput Mach 16(7): 399–405

    Google Scholar 

  27. Galliers RD, Sutherland AR (1991) Information systems management and strategy formulation: the ‘stages of growth’ model revisited. J Inform Syst 1(2): 89–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hirschheim R et al (1988) An exploration into the management of the information systems function: key issues and an evolutionary model. In: Information technology management for productivity and competitive advantage: an IFIP TC-8 open conference. Singapore

  29. CMMI Product Development Team (2000) CMMI for systems engineering/software engineering/integrated product and process development/supplier sourcing, version 1.1 continuous representation. Technical report CMU/SEI-2002-TR-011, ESC-TR-2002-011. Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh

  30. Schoenfeldt TI (2008) A practical application of supply chain management principles. American Society for Quality Press, Milwaukee

    Google Scholar 

  31. Lockamy A, McCormack K (2004) The development of a supply chain management process maturity model using the concepts of business process orientation. Supply Chain Manage 9(4): 272–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. King WR, Cleland DI (1975) A new method for strategic systems planning. Bus Horiz 18(4): 55–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. King WR (1985) Strategic planning for IS: the state of practice and research. Editor’s comment. MIS Q 9(2): 6–7

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ward J, Peppard J (2002) Strategic planning for information systems, 3rd edn. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  35. Henderson JC, Venkatraman N (1933) Strategic alignment: leveraging information technology for transforming organisations. IBM Syst J 32(1): 4–16

    Google Scholar 

  36. Chan YE, Reich BH (2008) IT alignment: an annotated bibliography. J Inform Technol 22: 316–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Coleman P, Papp R (2006) Strategic alignment: analysis of perspectives. In: Proceedings of the 2006 southern association for information systems conference. Jacksonville, Florida, pp 241–250

  38. Venkatraman N (1991) Information technology-induced business reconfiguration: the new strategic management challenge. In: Morton MSS (eds) The corporation of the 1990’s. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 122–158

    Google Scholar 

  39. Gluck FW, Kaufmann SP, Walleck AS (1980) Strategic management for competitive advantage. Harvard Business Review, pp 154–161

  40. Earl MJ (1993) Experiences in strategic information system planning. MIS Q 17(1): 1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. King JL, Kraemer KL (1984) Evolution and organizational information systems: an assessment of Nolan’s stage model. Commun Assoc Comput Mach 27(5): 466–475

    Google Scholar 

  42. Lyytinen K (1991) Penetration of information technology in organizations. Scand J Inform Syst 3: 87–109

    Google Scholar 

  43. Erturk SM, Ondategui-Parra S, Ros PR (2005) Quality management in radiology: historical aspects and basic definitions. J Am Coll Radiol 2(12): 985–991

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Davenport T (1993) Proces innovation, reengineering work through information technology. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  45. Hammer M, Champy J (1993) Reengineering the corporation: a manifesto for business revolution. Nicholas Brealey Publishing, London

    Google Scholar 

  46. Liedtka JM (1992) Formulating hospital strategy: moving beyond a market mentality. Health Care Manage Rev 17: 21–26

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Duyck P et al (2010) Monitoring the PACS implementation process in a large university hospital-discrepancies between radiologists and physicians. J Digit Imaging 23(1): 73–80

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Nagy P (2007) The future of PACS. Med Phys 34(7): 2676–2682

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Whittick D, Gill S (2006) Diagnostic imaging electronic health record (DI / EHR) challenges—strategy and planning perspective. In: The 24th international EuroPACS conference. Trondheim, Norway, pp 1–9

  50. Benbasat I et al (1984) A critique of the stage hypothesis: theory and empirical evidence. Commun ACM 27(5): 476–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Information and Computing Sciences, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 80.089, 3508 TB, Utrecht, The Netherlands

    Rogier van de Wetering & Ronald Batenburg

  2. NIVEL, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, PO Box 1568, 3500 BN, Utrecht, The Netherlands

    Ronald Batenburg

  3. Department of Information Systems, University of Melbourne, Level 4, 111 Barry Street, Carlton, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia

    Reeva Lederman

Authors
  1. Rogier van de Wetering
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ronald Batenburg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Reeva Lederman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rogier van de Wetering.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van de Wetering, R., Batenburg, R. & Lederman, R. Evolutionistic or revolutionary paths? A PACS maturity model for strategic situational planning. Int J CARS 5, 401–409 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-010-0414-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-010-0414-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation