[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Silicone rubber encapsulation for an endoscopically implantable gastrostimulator

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Gastrointestinal stimulator implants have recently shown positive results in treating obesity. However, the implantation currently requires an invasive surgical procedure. Endoscopy could be used to place the gastric stimulator in the stomach, hence avoiding the riskier surgery. The implant then needs to go through the oesophagus and be located inside the stomach, which imposes new design constraints, such as miniaturization and protecting the electronic circuit against the highly acidic environment of the stomach. We propose to protect the implant by encapsulation with silicone rubber. This paper lists the advantages of this method compared to the more usual approach of a hermetic enclosure and then presents a method to evaluate the underwater adhesive stability of six adhesive/substrate couples, using repeated lap-shear tests and an elevated temperature to accelerate the ageing process. The results for different adhesive/substrate couples tested, presented on probability plots, show that FR4 and alumina substrates with MED4-4220 silicone rubber are suitable for a first implantable prototype. We then compare these with the predicted lifetimes of bonds between historical standard silicone rubber DC3140 and different substrates and describe the encapsulation of our gastrostimulator.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Borton DA, Yin M, Aceros J, Nurmikko A (2013) An implantable wireless neural interface for recording cortical circuit dynamics in moving primates. J Neural Eng 10(2):026010–026026

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Brindley G (1994) The first 500 patients with sacral anterior root stimulator implants: general description. Paraplegia 32(312):795–805

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cilluffo T, Armstrong D, Castiglione F, Emde C, Galeazzi R, Gonvers JJ, Blum AL (1990) Reproducibility of ambulatory gastric pH recordings in the corpus and antrum. Scand J Gastroenterol 25(10):1076–1083

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. De Castro ML, Morales MJ, Martínez-Olmos MA, Pineda JR, Cid L, Estévez P, Del-Campo V, Rodriguez-Prada JI (2013) Safety and effectiveness of gastric balloons associated with hypocaloric diet for the treatment of obesity. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 105(9):529–536

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Deb S, Tang SJ, Abell TL, Rao S, Huang WD, Lahr C, Chiao JC (2012) An endoscopic wireless gastrostimulator (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 75(2):411–415

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Donaldson NN, Donaldson PEK (2000) Speeding-up the cure of one-part silicone rubber, when encapsulating neurological prostheses : the permeable mould. Med Eng Phys 22:301–306

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Donaldson PEK (1982) The underwater life of joints between adherend and adhesive materials useful in neurological prosthesis-making. In: Proceedings of international conference on Biomedical Polymers, Biological Engineering Society/Plastics & Rubber Institute, Durham, UK

  8. Donaldson PEK (1994) Hydrothermal stability of joints, using a silicone robber adhesive, for a range of adherends of interest to makers of surgically-implanted microelectronic devices. Int J Adhes Adhes 14(2):103–107

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Donaldson PEK (1995) Aspects of silicone rubber as encapsulant for neurological prostheses. Part 3: adhesion to mixed oxides. Med Biol Eng Comput 33(5):725–727

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Donaldson PEK (1997) Aspects of silicone rubber as encapsulant for neurological prostheses. Part 4: two-part rubbers. Med Biol Eng Comput 35:283–286

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Donaldson PEK, Aylett BJ (1995) Aspects of silicone rubber as encapsulant for neurological prostheses. Part 2: adhesion to binary oxides. Med Biol Eng Comput 33(3):289–292

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Donaldson PEK, Sayer E (1981) A technology for implantable hermetic packages. Part 2: an implementation. Med Biol Eng Comput 19(4):403–405

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Espinet-Coll E, Nebreda-Durán J, Gómez-Valero JA, Muñoz-Navas M, Pujol-Gebelli J, Vila-Lolo C, Martinez-Gomez A, Juan-Creix-Comamala A (2012) Current endoscopic techniques in the treatment of obesity. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 104(2):72–87

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Evans JT, DeLegge MH (2011) Intragastric balloon therapy in the management of obesity: why the bad wrap? J Parenter Enteral Nutr 35(1):25–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Finucane MM, Stevens G, Cowan MJ, Danaei G, Lin JK, Paciorek CJ, Singh GM, Gutierrez HR, Lu Y, Bahalim AN, Farzadfar F, Riley LM, Ezzati M (2011) National, regional, and global trends in body-mass index since 1980: systematic analysis of health examination surveys and epidemiological studies with 960 country-years and 9.1 million participants. Lancet 377(9765):557–567

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Genco A, Dellepiane D, Baglio G, Cappelletti F, Frangella F, Maselli R, Dante MC, Camoirano R, Lorenzo M, Basso N (2013) Adjustable intragastric balloon vs non-adjustable intragastric balloon: case–control study on complications, tolerance, and efficacy. Obes Surg 23(7):953–958

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Green RA, Guenther T, Jeschke C, Jaillon A, Yu JF, Dueck WF, Lim WW, Henderson WC, Vanhoestenberghe A, Lovell NH, Suaning GJ (2013) Integrated electrode and high density feedthrough system for chip-scaleoogle implantable devices. Biomaterials 34(26):6109–6118

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Harkema S, Gerasimenko Y, Hodes J, Burdick J, Angeli C, Chen Y, Ferraira C, Willhite A, Rejc E, Grossman RG, Edgerton VR (2011) Effect of epidural stimulation of the lumbosacral spinal cord on voluntary movement, standing, and assisted stepping after motor complete paraplegia: a case study. Lancet 377(9781):1938–1947

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hasler WL (2009) Methods of gastric electrical stimulation and pacing: a review of their benefits and mechanisms of action in gastroparesis and obesity. Neurogastroent Motil 21(3):229–243

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Herron DM, Birkett DH, Thompson CC, Bessler M, Swanström LL (2008) Gastric bypass pouch and stoma reduction using a transoral endoscopic anchor placement system: a feasibility study. Surg Endosc 22(4):1093–1099

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ibrahim M, Blero D, Deviere J (2010) Endoscopic options for the treatment of obesity. Gastroenterology 138(7):2228–2232

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Jiang G, Zhou DD (2010) Technology advances and challenges in hermetic packaging for implantable medical devices. In: Zhou DD, Greenbaum E (eds) Implantable neural prostheses 2. Biological and medical physics, biomedical engineering. Springer, New York, pp 27–61

    Google Scholar 

  23. Krames ES, Hunter Peckham P, Rezai AR (2009) Neuromodulation. Academic Press, Elsevier

  24. Lindberg M (2011) Case study: aging study of silicone materials in simulated gastric fluid. https://www.silicone-polymers.co.uk/pdf2011/Case%20Study-Aging%20Study%20of%20Silicone%20Materials%20in%20Simulated%20Gastric%20Fluid.pdf. Accessed 1 Sept 2014

  25. Lonys L, Hiernaux M, Cauche N, Devière J, Vanhoest A, Mathys P, Nonclercq A (2011) Challenges for the design of an endoscopically implanted electrostimulator. In: Communication A, Machado P (eds) 16th Annual conference of the International Functional Electrical Stimulation Society, Atha Communication and Publishing Machado, Sao Paulo, Brazil

  26. Nelson WB (1982) Applied life data analysis. Wiley, Hoboken

    Book  Google Scholar 

  27. Nusil (2012) Avoiding inhibition when working with platinum catalyzed silicones. p 9905

  28. Roman S, Napoléon B, Mion F, Bory R-M, Guyot P, D’Horazio H, Benchetrit S (2004) Intragastric balloon for “non-morbid” obesity: a retrospective evaluation of tolerance and efficacy. Obes Surg 14(4):539–544

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Rothermel A, Liu L, Aryan NP, Fischer M, Wuenschmann J, Kibbel S, Harscher A (2009) A cmos chip with active pixel array and specific test features for subretinal implantation. IEEE J Solid-State Circuits 44(1):290–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Scholz F (2008) Inference for the Weibull distribution. http://www.stat.washington.edu/fritz/DATAFILES498B2008/WeibullBounds.pdf. Accessed 7 Aug 2013

  31. Silimed (2010) Instruction for use: gastric balloon. http://medikell.hu/uploads/images/file/INSTRUCTIONS%20FOR%20USE.pdf. Accessed 1 Sept 2014

  32. Subei IM, Abdelazim A, Bayoumi A, Wahab MA, Deriny SE (1996) The effect of different types of intragastric balloons with and without a behavior modification program in morbid obesity. Saudi J Gastroenterol 2(2):63–68

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Traeger RK, Sandia L (1977) Nonhermeticity of polymeric lid sealants. IEEE Trans Parts Hybrids Packag 13(2):147–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Trudel J, Gauderer MWL, Drews MJ, LaBerge M (1998) Lipid uptake by silicone enteral access feeding devices. J Pediatr Surg 33(6):880–884

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Vanhoestenberghe A, Donaldson N (2013) Corrosion of silicon integrated circuits and lifetime predictions in implantable electronic devices. J Neural Eng 10(3):1002–1015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Vanhoestenberghe A, Donaldson N (2011) The limits of hermeticity test methods for micropackages. Artif Organs 35(3):242–244

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Williams DF (1982) Biodegradation of surgical polymers. J Mater Sci 17:1233–1246

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Withrow D, Alter DA (2011) The economic burden of obesity worldwide: a systematic review of the direct costs of obesity. Obes Rev 12(2):131–141

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Yap Kannan R, Nutt MR (2013) Are intra-gastric adjustable balloon system safe? A case series. Int J Surg Case Rep 4(10):936–938

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Yin M, Borton DA, Aceros J (2013) A 100-channel hermetically sealed implantable device for chronic wireless neurosensing applications. IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst 7(2):115–128

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Yin M, Li H, Bull C, Borton DA, Aceros J, Larson L, Nurmikko AV (2013) An externally head-mounted wireless neural recording device for laboratory animal research and possible human clinical use. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 3109–3114

  42. Zhou DD, Greenberg RJ (2009) Microelectronic visual prostheses. In: Zhou DD, Greenbaum E (eds) Implantable neural prostheses 1: devices and applications. Biological and medical physics, biomedical engineering. Springer, New York, pp 1–42

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge Mr. Bruno Tartini and Mr. Geoffrey Vanbienne for their contribution to the lap-shear tests.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Biomedical Stimulation and Monitoring Research Group (BISTIMO), Université Libre de Bruxelles, Avenue F.D. Roosevelt 50, CP165/51, 1050, Brussels, Belgium

    Laurent Lonys, Nicolas Julémont, Pierre Mathys & Antoine Nonclercq

  2. Implanted Devices Group, Medical Physics and Bioengineering Department, UCL, Gower Street, WC1E 6BT, London, UK

    Anne Vanhoestenberghe

  3. Materials Engineering, Characterization, Synthesis and Recycling (4MAT), Université Libre de Bruxelles, Avenue F.D. Roosevelt 50, CP165/63, 1050, Brussels, Belgium

    Stéphane Godet & Marie-Paule Delplancke

Authors
  1. Laurent Lonys
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anne Vanhoestenberghe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nicolas Julémont
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Stéphane Godet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Marie-Paule Delplancke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Pierre Mathys
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Antoine Nonclercq
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laurent Lonys.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lonys, L., Vanhoestenberghe, A., Julémont, N. et al. Silicone rubber encapsulation for an endoscopically implantable gastrostimulator. Med Biol Eng Comput 53, 319–329 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-014-1236-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-014-1236-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation