[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Log in

Biomechanical characterisation of fresh and cadaverous human small intestine: applications for abdominal trauma

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Intestinal injuries are responsible for significant morbidity and mortality arising from trauma to the abdomen. The biomechanical characterisation of the small intestine allows for the understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms responsible for these injuries. Studies reported in the literature focus principally on quasi-static tests, which do not take into account the stresses experienced during high kinetic trauma. In addition, the use of embalmed human tissue can alter the recorded response. The stress–strain curves from 43 tensile tests performed at 1 m/s were analysed. Samples were prepared from four fresh human intestines and from four embalmed cadaveric intestines. The data indicated a two-phase response, with each response consisting of a quasi-linear increase in the stress followed by an inflection in the curve before a peak preceding the loss of stress. The fresh tissue was more deformable than the embalmed tissue, and its first peak stress was lower (P = 0.034). A complementary histological analysis was performed. The results of the analysis enable an investigation of the response of the intestinal wall layers to stress as a two-layer structure and highlight the high sensitivity of the structure’s mechanical behaviour to the speed of loading and the method of preservation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brown JD, Rosen J, Kim YS, Chang L, Sinanan MN, Hannaford B (2003) In vivo and in situ compressive properties of porcine abdominal soft tissues. Stud Health Technol Inform 94:26–32

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Carter FJ, Frank TG, Davies PJ, McLean D, Cuschieri A (2001) Measurements and modelling of the compliance of human and porcine organs. Med Image Anal 5:231–236

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Conte C, Masson C, Arnoux PJ (2011) Inverse analysis and robustness evaluation for biological structure behaviour in FE simulation: application to the liver. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 15:993–999

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Conte C, Masson C, Cheynel N, Arnoux PJ (2009) Integration of liver behavior in FE simulation. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 12(S1):83–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Crandall JR, Bose D, Forman J, Untaroiu CD, Arregui-Dalmases C, Shaw CG, Kerrigan JR (2011) Human surrogates for injury biomechanics research. Clin Anat 24:362–371

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Egorov VI, Schastlivtsev IV, Prut EV, Baranov AO, Turusov RA (2002) Mechanical properties of the human gastrointestinal tract. J Biomech 35:1417–1425

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fakhry SM, Watts DD, Luchette FA, EAST Multi-Institutional Hollow Viscus Injury Research Group (2003) Current diagnostic approaches lack sensitivity in the diagnosis of perforated blunt small bowel injury: analysis from 275,557 trauma admissions from the EAST multi-institutional HVI trial. J Trauma 54:295–306

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fatouros MS, Vekinis G, Bourantas KL, Mylonakis EP, Scopelitou AS, Malamou-Mitsis VD, Kappas AM (1999) Influence of growth factors erythropoietin and granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor on mechanical strength and healing of colonic anastomoses in rats. Eur J Surg 165:986–992

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Frøkjaer JB, Liao D, Steffensen E, Dimcevski G, Bergmann A, Drewes AM, Gregersen H (2007) Geometric and mechanosensory properties of the sigmoid colon evaluated with magnetic resonance imaging. Neurogastroenterol Motil 19:253–262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gabella G (1987) The cross-ply arrangement of collagen fibres in the submucosa of the mammalian small intestine. Cell Tissue Res 248:491–497

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gao C, Gregersen H (2000) Biomechanical and morphological properties in rat large intestine. J Biomech 33:1089–1097

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gregersen H, Gilja OH, Hausken T, Heimdal A, Gao C, Matre K, Ødegaard S, Berstad A (2002) Mechanical properties in the human gastric antrum using B-mode ultrasonography and antral distension. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 283:G368–G375

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Higa M, Luo Y, Okuyama T, Takagi T, Shiraishi Y, Yambe T (2007) Passive mechanical properties of large intestine under in vivo and in vitro compression. Med Eng Phys 29:840–844

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hughes TM, Elton C (2002) The pathophysiology and management of bowel and mesenteric injuries due to blunt trauma. Injury 33:295–302

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim J, Ahn B, De S, Srinivasan MA (2008) An efficient soft tissue characterization algorithm from in vivo indentation experiments for medical simulation. Int J Med Robot 4:277–285

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee JB, Yang KH (2001) Development of a finite element model of the human abdomen. Stapp Car Crash J 45:79–100

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lim YJ, Deo D, Singh TP, Jones DB, De S (2009) In situ measurement and modeling of biomechanical response of human cadaveric soft tissues for physics-based surgical simulation. Surg Endosc 23:1298–1307

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Qiao Y, Pan E, Chakravarthula SS, Han F, Liang J, Gudlavalleti S (2005) Measurement of mechanical properties of rectal wall. J Mater Sci Mater Med 16:183–188

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Viano DC, Lau IV, Asbury C, King AI, Begeman P (1989) Biomechanics of the human chest, abdomen, and pelvis in lateral impact. Accid Anal Prev 21:553–574

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Watters DA, Smith AN, Eastwood MA, Anderson KC, Elton RA (1985) Mechanical properties of the rat colon: the effect of age, sex and different conditions of storage. Q J Exp Physiol 70:151–162

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Watters DA, Smith AN, Eastwood MA, Anderson KC, Elton RA, Mugerwa JW (1985) Mechanical properties of the colon: comparison of the features of the African and European colon in vitro. Gut 26:384–392

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Watts DD, Fakhry SM, EAST Multi-Institutional Hollow Viscus Injury Research Group (2003) Incidence of hollow viscus injury in blunt trauma: an analysis from 275,557 trauma admissions from the East multi-institutional trial. J Trauma 54:289–294

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Winckler G (1974) Manuel d’Anatomie Topographique et Fonctionnelle, 2nd edn. Masson, Paris [publication in French]

    Google Scholar 

  24. Yamada H (1972) Strength of biological materials, 2nd edn. Williams and Watkins, Baltimora

    Google Scholar 

  25. Yoganandan N, Stemper BD, Pintar FA, Maiman DJ (2001) Use of postmortem human subjects to describe injury responses and tolerances. Clin Anat 24:282–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the help provided by Dr. Cécile Conte, Dr. François Coulongeat and Ms. Marie Pauchard during the course of this study.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stéphane Bourgouin.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 29 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (PDF 544 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bourgouin, S., Bège, T., Masson, C. et al. Biomechanical characterisation of fresh and cadaverous human small intestine: applications for abdominal trauma. Med Biol Eng Comput 50, 1279–1288 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-012-0964-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-012-0964-y

Keywords

Navigation