[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Log in

Tissue-specific functions based on information content of gene ontology using cap analysis gene expression

  • Special Issue
  • Published:
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Gene expressions differ depending on tissue types and developmental stages. Analyzing how each gene is expressed is thus important. One way of analyzing gene expression patterns is to identify tissue-specific functions. This is useful for understanding how vital activities are performed. DNA microarray has been widely used to observe gene expressions exhaustively. However, comparing the expression value of a gene to that of other genes is impossible, as the gene expression value of a condition is measured as a proportion of that for the same gene under a control condition. We therefore could not determine whether one gene is more expressed than other genes. Cap analysis gene expression (CAGE) allows high-throughput analysis of gene expressions by counting the number of cDNAs of expressed genes. CAGE enables comparison of the expression value of the gene to that of other genes in the same tissue. In this study, we propose a method for exploring tissue-specific functions using data from CAGE. To identify tissue-specificity, one of the simplest ways is to assume that the function of the most expressed gene is regarded as the most tissue-specific. However, the most expressed gene in a tissue might highly express in all tissues, as seen with housekeeping genes. Functions of such genes cannot be tissue-specific. To remove these from consideration, we propose measuring tissue specificity of functions based on information content of gene ontology terms. We applied our method to data from 16 human tissues and 22 mouse tissues. The results from liver and prostate gland indicated that well-known functions of these tissues, such as functions related to signaling and muscle in prostate gland and immune function in liver, displayed high rank.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adams MD, Kelly JM et al (1991) Complementary DNA sequencing: expressed sequence tags and human genome project. Science 252:1651–1656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Collins FS, Morgan M, Patrinos A (2003) The human genome project: lessons from large-scale biology. Science 300:286–290

    Google Scholar 

  3. DeRisi JL, Iyer VR, Brouwn PO (1997) Exploring the metabolic and genetic control of gene expression on a genomic scale. Science 278:680–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Frith MC, Wilming LG, Forrest A, Kawaji H, Tan SL, Wahlestedt C, Bajic VB, Kai C, Kawai J, Carninci P, Hayashizaki Y, Bailey TL, Huminiecki L (2006) Pseudo-messenger RNA: phantoms of the transcriptome. PLoS Genet 2(4):e23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Imahori IK, Tamio Y (eds) (1998) Dictionary of biochemistory, 3rd edn. Tokyo Kagaku Doujin, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ito K (ed) (1993) Encyclopedic dictionary of mathematics, 2nd edn. Informaton Theory. MIT, Cambridge, pp 810–815

  7. Kasukawa T, Katayama S, Kawaji H, Suzuki H, Hume DA, Hayashizaki Y (2004) Construction of representative transcript and protein sets of human, mouse, and rat as a platform for their transcriptome and proteome analysis. Genomics 84:913–921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kodozius R, Matsumura Y, Kasukawa T, Shimokawa K, Fukuda S et al (2004) Absolute expression values for mouse transcripts: re-annotation of the READ expression database by the use of CAGE and EST sequence tags. FEBS Lett 559:22–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Schug J, Schuller W-P, Kappen C, Salbaum JM, Bucan M, Stoeckert CJ Jr (2005) Promoter features related to tissue specificity as measured by Shannon entropy. Genome Biol 6:R33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Shiraki T, Kondo S, Waki K, Kasukawa T et al (2003) Cap analysis gene expression for high-throughput analysis of transcriptional starting point and identification of promoter usage. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:15776–15781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Spellman PT et al (1998) Comprehensive identification of cell cycle-regulated genes of the yeast saccharomyces cerevisiae by microarray hybridization. Mol Biol Cell 9:3273–3297

    Google Scholar 

  12. The FANTOM Consortium (2005) The transcriptional landscape of the mammalian genome. Science 309:1559–1563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. The Gene Ontology Consortium (2001) Creating the gene ontology resource: design and implementation. Genome Res 11:1425–1433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Velculcscu VE et al (1995) Serial analysis of gene expression. Science 270:484–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sami Maekawa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maekawa, S., Matsumoto, A., Takenaka, Y. et al. Tissue-specific functions based on information content of gene ontology using cap analysis gene expression. Med Bio Eng Comput 45, 1029–1036 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-007-0274-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-007-0274-y

Keywords

Navigation