[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Log in

Adaptive blind separation of underdetermined mixtures based on sparse component analysis

  • Published:
Science in China Series F: Information Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The independence priori is very often used in the conventional blind source separation (BSS). Naturally, independent component analysis (ICA) is also employed to perform BSS very often. However, ICA is difficult to use in some challenging cases, such as underdetermined BSS or blind separation of dependent sources. Recently, sparse component analysis (SCA) has attained much attention because it is theoretically available for underdetermined BSS and even for blind dependent source separation sometimes. However, SCA has not been developed very sufficiently. Up to now, there are only few existing algorithms and they are also not perfect as well in practice. For example, although Lewicki-Sejnowski’s natural gradient for SCA is superior to K-mean clustering, it is just an approximation without rigorously theoretical basis. To overcome these problems, a new natural gradient formula is proposed in this paper. This formula is derived directly from the cost function of SCA through matrix theory. Mathematically, it is more rigorous. In addition, a new and robust adaptive BSS algorithm is developed based on the new natural gradient. Simulations illustrate that this natural gradient formula is more robust and reliable than Lewicki-Sejnowski’s gradient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cao X R, Liu R W. General approach to blind source separation. IEEE Trans Sig Proc, 1996, 44: 562–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Comon P. Independent component analysis, a new concept? Sig Proc, 1992, 36(3): 287–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Suzuki K, Kiryu T, Nakada T. Fast and precise independent component analysis for high field fMRI time series tailored using prior information on spatiotemporal structure. Human Brain Map, 2001, 15: 54–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lu W, Rajapakse J C. Constrained ICA. NIPS, 2000, 570–576

  5. Lu W, Rajapakse JC. ICA with reference. Proc ICA2001, 2001, 120–125

  6. Bell A J, Sejnowski T J. An information-maximization approach to blind source separation and blind deconvolution. Neural Comput, 1995, 7: 1129–1159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Xie S L, Zhang J L. Blind separation algorithm of minimal mutual information based on rotating transform. Acta Elect Sin (in Chinese), 2002, 30(5): 628–631

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hyvarinen A, Oja E. A fast fixed-point algorithm for independent component analysis. Neural Comput, 1997, 9(7): 1483–1492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tan H Z, Chow T W S. Blind and total identification of ARMA models in higher order cumulants domain. IEEE Trans Indust Elect, 1999, 46(6): 1233–1240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tan H Z, Chow T W S. Blind identification of quadratic nonlinear models using neural networks with higher order cumulants. IEEE Trans Indust Elect, 2000, 47(3): 687–696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tan H Z, Aboulnasr T. TOM-based blind identification of nonlinear Volterra systems. IEEE Trans Instr Meas, 2006, 55(1): 300–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hyvarinen A. Blind source separation by nonstationarity of variance: a cumulant-based approach. IEEE Trans Neural Network, 2001, 12(6): 1471–1474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Matsuoka K, Ohya M, Kawamoto M. A neural net for blind separation of nonstationary signals. Neural Networks, 1995, 8(3): 411–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang J L, He Z S, Xie S L. Geometric blind separation algorithm for many source signals. Chinese J Comput (in Chinese), 2005, 28(9): 1575–1581

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Li Y Q, Wang J. Blind extraction of singularly mixed source signals. IEEE Trans Sign Proc, 2000, 11: 1413–1422

    Google Scholar 

  16. Li Y Q, Wang J. Sequential blind extraction of instantaneously mixed sources. IEEE Trans Sig Proc, 2002, 50(5): 997–1006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zibulevsky M, Pearlmutter B A. Blind source separation by sparse decomposition in a signal dictionary. Neural Comput, 2001, 13(4): 863–882

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Belouchrani A, Cardoso J F. Maximum likelihood source separation for discrete sources. Proc EUSIPCO, 1994, 768–771

  19. Lee T W, Lewicki M S, Girolami M, et al. Blind source separation of more sources than mixtures using overcomplete representation. IEEE Sig Proc Lett, 1999, 6(4): 87–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lewicki M S, Sejnowski T J. Learning overcomplete representations. Neural Comput, 2000, 12: 337–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Li Y Q, Cichocki A, Amari S. Analysis of sparse representation and blind source separation. Neural Comput, 2004, 16(6): 1193–1234

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Bofill P, Zibulevsky M. Underdetermined source separation using sparse representations. Sig Proc, 2001, 81: 2353–2362

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Lee T W, Lewicki M, Sejnowski T. ICA mixture models for unsupervised classification of nongaussian sources and automatic context switching in blind signal separation. IEEE Trans Patt Recogn Mach Intel, 2000, 22(10): 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang L Q, Amari S, Cichocki A. Natural gradient approach to blind separation of over-and undercomplete mixtures. In: Proc of ICA1999, Aussois, France, Jan. 1999. 455–460

  25. Donoho D L, Elad M. Maximal sparsity representation via l 1 minimization. In: Proc National Academy Science, 2003, 100: 2197–2202

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Takigawa I, Kudo M, Toyama J. Performance analysis of minimum l 1-norm solutions for underdetermined source separation. IEEE Trans Sig Proc, 2004, 52(3): 582–591

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Parra L, Spence C. Convolutive blind separation of nonstationary sources. IEEE Trans Speech Audio Proc, 2000, 8: 320–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to ShengLi Xie.

Additional information

Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 60505005, 60674033, 60774094 and U0635001), the Natural Science Fund of Guangdong Province, China (Grant Nos. 05103553 and 05006508), the Postdoctoral Science Foundation for Innovation from South China University of Technology, and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 20070410237)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yang, Z., He, Z., Xie, S. et al. Adaptive blind separation of underdetermined mixtures based on sparse component analysis. Sci. China Ser. F-Inf. Sci. 51, 381–393 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-008-0030-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-008-0030-4

Keywords

Navigation