[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Examining young children’s perception toward augmented reality-infused dramatic play

  • Development Article
  • Published:
Educational Technology Research and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Amid the increasing interest in applying augmented reality (AR) in educational settings, this study explores the design and enactment of an AR-infused robot system to enhance children’s satisfaction and sensory engagement with dramatic play activities. In particular, we conducted an exploratory study to empirically examine children’s perceptions toward the computer- and robot-mediated AR systems designed to make dramatic play activities interactive and participatory. A multi-disciplinary expert group consisting of early childhood education experts, preschool teachers, AR specialists, and robot engineers collaborated to develop a learning scenario and technological systems for dramatic play. The experiment was conducted in a kindergarten setting in Korea, with 81 children (aged 5–6 years old). The participants were placed either in the computer-mediated AR condition (n = 40) or the robot-mediated AR condition (n = 41). We administered an instrument to measure children’s perceived levels of the following variables: (a) satisfaction (i.e., interest in dramatic play & user-friendliness), (b) sensory immersion (i.e., self-engagement, environment-engagement & interaction-engagement), and (c) media recognition (i.e., collaboration with media, media function & empathy with media). Data analysis indicates that children in the robot-mediated condition showed significantly higher perceptions than those in the computer-mediated condition regarding the following aspects: interest in dramatic play (satisfaction), interactive engagement (sensory immersion), and empathy with media (media recognition). Furthermore, it was found that the younger-aged children and girls, in particular, perceived AR-infused dramatic play more positively than the older-aged children and boys, respectively. The contribution of this study is to provide empirical evidence about the affordances of robots and AR-based learning systems for young children. This remains a relatively unexplored area of research in the field of learning technologies. Implications of the current study and future research directions are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Adalgeirsson, S. O., & Breazeal, C. (2010). Mebot, a robotic platform for socially embodied telepresence. Proceedings of the fifth ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 15–22). Japan: Osaka.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhamjee, S., Griffiths, F., & Palmer, J. (2011). Children’s perception and interpretation of robots and robot behavior. In M. H. Lamers & F. J. Verbeek (Eds.), Human-Robot Personal Relationships. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billinghurst, M., Grasset, R., & Looser, J. (2005). Designing augmented reality interfaces. SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, 39(1), 17–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodrova, E., & Leong, D. J. (1998). Development of dramatic play in young children and its effect on self-regulation: The Vygotskian approach. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 19(2), 115–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, B., & Charles, M. (2010). Using socio-dramatic play to support a beginning writer: ‘Daniel, the doctor and the bleeding ball’. International Journal of Early Years Education, 18(3), 213–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bredekamp, S. (1987). Developmentally appropriate practice. Washington, D.C.: NAEYC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, M. S., Goin, L., & Dolon, J. T. (1990). A computer in my room. Young Children, 45, 62–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Center for R-Learning Development Promotion & Support (2011). Introduction of the r-learning system of Korea. Retrieved from http://www.r-learning.or.kr/new/leaflet/KIST_leaflet_EN.pdf.

  • Chambers, A. (1996). Tell me: children, reading, and talk. York, ME: Stenhouse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, C. W., Leea, J. H., Wanga, C. Y., & Chen, G. D. (2010). Improving the authentic learning experience by integrating robots into the mixed-reality environment. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1572–1578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiasson, S. & Gutwin, C. (2005). Testing the media equation with children. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 829–838.

  • Clark, R. E., & Sugrue, B. (1995). Research on instructional media. In G. Anglin (Ed.), Instructional technology: past, present, and future (pp. 1978–1988). Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordes, C., & Miller, E. (2000). Fool’s gold: A critical look at computers in childhood. Alliance for Childhood. Retrieved March 23, 2014, from http://drupal6.allianceforchildhood.org/fools_gold.

  • Crook, C. (1998). Children as computer users: the case of collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 30(3–4), 237–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, J. (1989). Children & computers together in the early childhood classroom. Albany, New York: Delmar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Serio, Á., Ibáñez, M. B., & Kloos, C. D. (2013). Impact of an augmented reality system on students’ motivation for a visual art course. Computers & Education, 68, 586–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drenten, J., Peters, C. O., & Thomas, J. D. (2008). An exploratory investigation of the dramatic play of preschool children within a grocery store shopping context. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 35(10), 831–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fessakis, G., Gouli, E., & Mavroudi, E. (2013). Problem solving by 5–6 years old kindergarten children in a computer programming environment: A case study. Computers & Education, 63, 87–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis, A., & Mishra, P. (2009). Is AIBO real? Understanding children’s beliefs about and behavioral interactions with anthropomorphic toys. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 20(4), 405–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, J. (2010). 17. Robot-Aided Learning and r-Learning Services, Human-Robot Interaction, Daisuke Chugo (Ed.), ISBN:978-953-307-051-3, Available from: http://sciyo.com/articles/show/title/ robot-aided-learning-and-r-learning-services, INTECH, Austria.

  • Han, J. (2012). Robot assisted language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 16(3), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyun, E. & Yoon, H. (2009). Characteristics of young children’s utilization of a robot during play time: A case study. Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication 18th Annual Conference. Toyama, Japan.

  • Jo, M., Han, J., Hyun, E., Kim, G., & Kim, N. (2011). Development and utilization of projector-robot service for children’s dramatic play activities based on augmented reality. Advances in Information Sciences and Service Sciences, 3(5), 277–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, L., Adams, S., & Cummins, M. (2012). NMC horizon report: 2012 K-12 edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kafai, Y. B., & Resnick, M. (1996). Constructionism in practice: Designing, thinking, and learning in a digital world. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamarainen, A. M., Metcalf, S., Grotzer, T., Browne, A., Mazzuca, D., Tutwiler, M. S., & Dede, C. (2013). EcoMOBILE: Integrating augmented reality and probeware with environmental education field trips. Computers & Education, 68, 545–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanda, T., Hirano, T., Eaton, D., & Ishiguro, H. (2004). Interactive robots as social partners and peer tutors for children: a field trial. Human-Computer Interaction, 19(1&2), 61–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kauffmann, H. (2009). Dynamic differential geometry in education. Journal for Geometry and Graphics, 13(2), 131–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, H., & Schmalstieg, D. (2003). Mathematics and geometry education with collaborative augmented reality. Computers and Graphics, 27(3), 339–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kesim, M. & Ozarslan, Y. (2012). Augmented reality in education: Current technologies and the potential for education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 297–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kidd, C.D & Breazeal, C. (2007). A robotic weight loss coach, The 22th Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

  • Klopfer, E., & Squire, K. (2008). Environmental Detectives—the development of an augmented reality platform for environmental simulations. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(2), 203–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozulin, A., & Pressessien, B. Z. (1995). Mediated learning experience and psychological tools: Vygotsky’s and Feuerstein’s perspective in study of student learning. Educational Psychologist, 30(2), 67–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krendle, K., Ware, W.H., Reid, K.A., & Warren, R. (1999). Learning by any other name: Communication research traditions in learning and media. In D.H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communication and technology. New York: Macmillan. Retrieved from http://www.aect.org/edtech/ed1/pdf/04.pdf.

  • Lee, G., Nelles, C., Billinghurst, M., & Kim, G. (2004). Immersive authoring of tangible augmented reality applications. In Proceedings of International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR 2005), 171–182.

  • Mendoza, J., & Katz, L. G. (2008). Introduction to the special section on dramatic play. Early Childhood Research & Practice, 10(2), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, D. (2003). Children’s literature: an invitation to the world. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Movellan, J., Eckhardt, M., Virnes, M., & Rodriguez, A. (2009, March). Sociable robot improves toddler vocabulary skills. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE international conference on Human robot interaction (pp. 307–308). ACM.

  • New Media Consortium (2012). Horizon Report: K-12 edition.

  • Olsen, A. E., & Sumsion, J. (2000). Early childhood teacher practices regarding the use of dramatic play in K-2 classrooms. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Australian Association for Research in Education, Sydney, Australia.

  • Park, S., Han, J., Kang, B., & Shin, K. (2011). Teaching assistant robot, ROBOSEM, in English class and practical issues for its diffusion, Proceeding of the IEEE Workshop of Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts (ARSO), ISBN: 978-1-4673-0795-6, p 8–11, 2–4 Oct., Half-Moon Bay, CA, USA.

  • Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peisach, E., & Hardeman, M. (1984). Imaginative play and logical thinking in young children. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 146(2), 233–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pemberton, L., & Winter, M. (2009). Collaborative augmented reality in schools. Retrieved from http://ltee.org/uploads/cscl2009/paper236.pdf.

  • Reeves, B., & Nass, C. (1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, televisions, and new media like real people and places. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, Y., Scaife, M., Gabrielli, S., Smith, H., & Harris, E. (2002). A conceptual framework for mixed reality environments: designing novel learning activities for young children. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 11(6), 677–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roschelle, J. M., Pea, R. D., Hoadley, C. M., Gordin, D. N., & Means, B. M. (2000). Changing how and what children learn in school with computer-based technologies. The Future of Children, 10(2), 76–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roskos, K., & Christie, J. (Eds.). (2000). Play and literacy in early childhood: Research from multiple perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryokai, K., & Cassel, J. (2000). StoryMat: A play space for collaborative storytelling. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on human factors in computing systems (Pittsburgh, PA, May 15 Con). New York, NY, 272–73.

  • Schirrmacher, R., & Fox, J. E. (2009). Art and creative development for young children. Albany, NY: Thomson Delmar Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seichter, H. (2007). Augmented reality and tangible interfaces in collaborative urban design. In Proceedings of the 12th International CAAD Futures Conference: Integrating Technologies for Computer-Aided Design. July 11–13, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

  • Sheridan, S., Giota, J., Han, Y. M., & Kwon, J. Y. (2009). A cross-cultural study of preschool quality in South Korea and Sweden: ECERS evaluations. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 24(2), 142–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siltanen, S. (2012). Theory and applications of marker-based augmented reality. Espoo, VTT. Retrieved on 12 August 2013 from http://www.vtt.fi/inf/pdf/science/2012/S3.pdf.

  • Smilansky, S. (1990). Sociodramatic play: its relevance to behavior and achievement in school. In E. Klugman & S. Smilansky (Eds.), Children’s play and learning: perspectives and policy implications. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Squire, K., & Klopfer, E. (2007). Augmented reality simulations on handheld computers. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(3), 371–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sugimoto, M., Ito, T., Nguyen, T.N., & Inagaki, S. (2009). GENTORO: A system for supporting children’s storytelling using handheld projectors and a robot, 214-217, In Proceeding of IDC 2009, June 3–5, 2009, Como, Italy.

  • Tanaka, F., Cicourel, A., & Movellan, J. R. (2007). Socialization between toddlers and robots at an early childhood education center. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(46), 17954–17958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, J. C., Huston, A. C., Reltz, A. L., & Plemat, S. (1994). Young children’s perceptions of television reality: Determinants and developmental differences. Developmental Psychology, 30(2), 229–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, H. K., Lee, S. W. Y., Chang, H. Y., & Liang, J. C. (2013). Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education. Computers & Education, 62, 41–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, S. A., Elinich, K., Wang, J., Steinmeier, C., & Tucker, S. (2012). Using augmented reality and knowledge-building scaffolds to improve learning in a science museum. International Journal of Computer-supported Collaborative Learning, 7(4), 519–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by a Grant (NRF-2010-32A- B00183) and partially by Basic Science Research Program (NRF-2012R1A1A2039797) through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded from the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeonghye Han.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Han, J., Jo, M., Hyun, E. et al. Examining young children’s perception toward augmented reality-infused dramatic play. Education Tech Research Dev 63, 455–474 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9374-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9374-9

Keywords

Navigation