[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Log in

Emphasizing Essential Words for Sentiment Classification Based on Recurrent Neural Networks

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Computer Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the explosion of online communication and publication, texts become obtainable via forums, chat messages, blogs, book reviews and movie reviews. Usually, these texts are much short and noisy without sufficient statistical signals and enough information for a good semantic analysis. Traditional natural language processing methods such as Bow-of-Word (BOW) based probabilistic latent semantic models fail to achieve high performance due to the short text environment. Recent researches have focused on the correlations between words, i.e., term dependencies, which could be helpful for mining latent semantics hidden in short texts and help people to understand them. Long short-term memory (LSTM) network can capture term dependencies and is able to remember the information for long periods of time. LSTM has been widely used and has obtained promising results in variants of problems of understanding latent semantics of texts. At the same time, by analyzing the texts, we find that a number of keywords contribute greatly to the semantics of the texts. In this paper, we establish a keyword vocabulary and propose an LSTM-based model that is sensitive to the words in the vocabulary; hence, the keywords leverage the semantics of the full document. The proposed model is evaluated in a short-text sentiment analysis task on two datasets: IMDB and SemEval-2016, respectively. Experimental results demonstrate that our model outperforms the baseline LSTM by 1%~2% in terms of accuracy and is effective with significant performance enhancement over several non-recurrent neural network latent semantic models (especially in dealing with short texts). We also incorporate the idea into a variant of LSTM named the gated recurrent unit (GRU) model and achieve good performance, which proves that our method is general enough to improve different deep learning models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Wang G, Zhang Z, Sun J S, Sun J S, Yang S L, Larsonc C A. POS-RS: A random subspace method for sentiment classification based on part-of-speech analysis. Information Processing & Management, 2015, 51(4): 458-479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hua W, Wang Z Y, Wang H X, Zheng K, Zhou X F. Short text understanding through lexical-semantic analysis. In Proc. Int. Conf. Data Engineering, April 2015, pp.495-506.

  3. Zou H, Tang X H, Xie B, Liu B. Sentiment classification using machine learning techniques with syntax features. In Proc. Int. Conf. Computational Science and Computational Intelligence, Dec. 2015, pp.175-179.

  4. Davuth N, Kim S R. Classification of malicious domain names using support vector machine and bi-gram method. International Journal of Security and its Applications, 2013, 7(1): 51-58.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bao S H, Xu S L, Zhang L, Yan R, Su Z, Han D Y, Yu Y. Mining social emotions from affective text. IEEE Trans. Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2012, 24(9): 1658-1670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rao Y H, Lei J S, Liu W Y, Li Q, Chen M L. Building emotional dictionary for sentiment analysis of online news. World Wide Web, 2014, 17(4): 723-742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Stoyanov V, Cardie C. Annotating topics of opinions. In Proc. the 6th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, May 31-June 1, 2008, pp.3213-3217.

  8. Cheng X Q, Yan X H, Guo Y Y, Guo J F. BTM: Topic modeling over short texts. IEEE Trans. Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2014, 26(12): 2928-2941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang Z Y, Zhao K J, Wang H X, Meng X F, Wen J R. Query understanding through knowledge-based conceptualization. In Proc. the 24th Int. Conf. Artificial Intelligence, July 2015, pp.3264-3270.

  10. Cheng J P, Wang Z Y, Wen J R, Yan J. Contextual text understanding in distributional semantic space. In Proc. the 24th ACM Int. Conf. Information and Knowledge Management, Oct. 2015, pp.133-142.

  11. Cui W Y, Zhou X Y, Lin H Y, Xiao Y H. Verb pattern: A probabilistic semantic representation on verbs. In Proc. the 30th AAAI Conf. Artificial Intelligence, March 2016, pp.2587-2593.

  12. Zhang X W, Wu B. Short text classification based on feature extension using the n-gram model. In Proc. the 12th Int. Conf. Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery, Aug. 2015, pp.710-716.

  13. López G J, Ruiz I M. Character and word baselines systems for irony detection in Spanish short texts. Procesamiento de Lenguaje Natural, 2016, 56: 41-48.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Song G, Ye Y M, Du X L, Huang X H, Bie S F. Short text classification: A survey. Journal of Multimedia, 2014, 9(5): 635-643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang M, Lin L F, Wang F. Improving short text classification through better feature space selection. In Proc. the 9th Int. Conf. Computational Intelligence and Security, December 2013, pp.120-124.

  16. Wang B K, Huang Y F, Yang W X, Li X. Short text classification based on strong feature thesaurus. Journal of Zhejiang University Science C, 2012, 13(9): 649-659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim K, Chung B S, Choi Y, Lee S, Jung J Y, Park J. Language independent semantic kernels for short-text classification. Expert Systems with Applications, 2014, 41(2): 735-743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fan X H, Hu H G. Construction of high-quality feature extension mode library for Chinese short-text classification. In Proc. WASE Int. Conf. Information Engineering, Aug. 2010, pp.87-90.

  19. Song Y Q, Wang H X, Wang Z Y, Li H S, Chen W Z. Short text conceptualization using a probabilistic knowledgebase. In Proc. the 22nd Int. Joint Conf. Artificial Intelligence, July 2011, pp.2330-2336.

  20. Kim D, Wang H X, Oh A. Context-dependent conceptualization. In Proc. the 23rd Int. Joint Conf. Artificial Intelligence, Aug. 2013, pp.2654-2661.

  21. Huang P S, He X D, Gao J F, Deng L, Acero A, Heck L. Learning deep structured semantic models for web search using clickthrough data. In Proc. the 22nd ACM Int. Conf. Information & Knowledge Management, Oct. 2013, pp.2333-2338.

  22. Shen Y L, He X D, Gao J F, Deng L, Mesnil G. A latent semantic model with convolutional-pooling structure for information retrieval. In Proc. the 23rd ACM Int. Conf. Information and Knowledge Management, Nov. 2014, pp.101-110.

  23. Hochreiter S, Schmidhuber J. Long short-term memory. Neural Computation, 1997, 9(8): 1735-1780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hu F, Xu X F, Wang J Y, Yang Z B, Li L. Memoryenhanced latent semantic model: Short text understanding for sentiment analysis. In Proc. Int. Conf. Database Systems for Advanced Applications. March 2017, pp.393-407.

  25. Hofmann T. Unsupervised learning by probabilistic latent semantic analysis. Machine Learning, 2001, 42(1/2): 177-196.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang J, Peng J X, Liu O. A classification approach for less popular webpages based on latent semantic analysis and rough set model. Expert Systems with Applications, 2015, 42(1): 642-648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ke X H, Luo H J. Using LSA and PLSA for text quality analysis. In Proc. Int. Conf. Electronic Science and Automation Control, Jan. 2015, pp.289-291.

  28. Anoop V S, Prem S C, Asharaf S, Alessandro Z. Generating and visualizing topic hierarchies from microblogs: An iterative latent dirichlet allocation approach. In Proc. Int. Conf. Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics, Aug. 2015, pp.824-828.

  29. Gao J F, Toutanova K, Yih W T. Clickthrough-based latent semantic models for web search. In Proc. the 34th Int. ACM SIGIR Conf. Research and Development in Information Retrieval, July 2011, pp.675-684.

  30. Hinton G E, Salakhutdinov R R. Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks. Science, 2006, 313(5786): 504-507.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Bengio Y, Ducharme R, Vincent P, Janvin C. A neural probabilistic language model. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2003, 3(2): 1137-1155.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Huang E H, Socher R, Manning C D, Ng A Y. Improving word representations via global context and multiple word prototypes. In Proc. the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Long Papers-Volume 1, July 2012, pp.873-882.

  33. Salakhutdinov R, Hinton G. Semantic hashing. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 2009, 50(7): 969-978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Mikolov T, Karafiát M, Burget L, Ćernocký J, Khudanpur S. Recurrent neural network based language model. In Proc. the 11th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, Sept. 2010, 1045-1048.

  35. Mikolov T. Statistical language models based on neural networks. http://www.fit.vutbr.cz/_imikolov/rnnlm/google.pdf, March 2015.

  36. Williams R J, Zipser D. Gradient-based learning algorithms for recurrent networks and their computational complexity. In Backpropagation: Theory, Architectures, and Applications, Chauvin Y, Rumelhart D E (eds.), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 1995, pp.433-486.

  37. Pascanu R, Mikolov T, Bengio Y. On the difficulty of training recurrent neural networks. In Proc. the 30th Int. Conf. Machine Learning, June 2013, pp.1310-1318.

  38. Hochreiter S. The vanishing gradient problem during learning recurrent neural nets and problem solutions. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 1998, 6(2): 107-116.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Olah C. Understanding LSTM networks. http://colah.github. io/posts/2015-08-Understanding-LSTMs/, Sept. 2016.

  40. Gers F A, Schmidhuber J, Cummins F. Learning to forget: Continual prediction with LSTM. Neural Computation, 2000, 12(10): 2451-2471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Gers F A, Schmidhuber J. Recurrent nets that time and count. In Proc. the IEEE-INNS-ENNS Int. Joint Conf. Neural Networks, July 2000.

  42. Greff K, Srivastava R K, Koutník J, Steunebrink B R, Schmidhuber J. LSTM: A search space odyssey. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2015, PP(99): 1-11.

  43. Cho K, van Merriënboer B, Gulcehre C, Bahdanau D, Bougares F, Schwenk H, Bengio Y. Learning phrase representations using RNN encoder-decoder for statistical machine translation. arXiv:1406.1078, 2014. http://arxiv.org/abs/1406.1078, Sept. 2016.

  44. Esuli A, Sebastiani F. SentiWordNet: A publicly available lexical resource for opinion mining. In Proc. the 5th Conf. Language Resources and Evaluation, May 2006, pp.417-422.

  45. Baccianella S, Esuli A, Sebastiani F. SentiWordNet 3.0: An enhanced lexical resource for sentiment analysis and opinion mining. In Proc. the 7th Conf. Int. Language Resources and Evaluation, Jan. 2010, pp.2200-2204.

  46. Miller G A. WordNet: A lexical database for English. Communications of the ACM, 1995, 38(11): 39-41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Maas A L, Daly R E, Pham P T, Huang D, Ng A Y, Potts C. Learning word vectors for sentiment analysis. In Proc. the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies-Volume 1, June 2011, pp.142-150.

  48. Nakov P, Ritter A, Rosenthal S, Sebastiani F, Stoyanov V. Evaluation measures for the semeval-2016 task 4: Sentiment analysis in twitter. http://alt.qcri.org/semeval2016/task4/, Feb. 2017.

  49. LeCun Y, Bottou L, Orr G B, Müller K R. Efficient backprop. In Neural Networks: Tricks of the Trade, Orr G B, Müller K R (eds.), Springer, 2012, pp.9-50.

  50. Zeiler M D. ADADELTA: An adaptive learning rate method. arXiv:1212.5701, 2012. https://arxiv.org/abs/1212.5701, Sept. 2016.

  51. Duchi J, Hazan E, Singer Y. Adaptive subgradient methods for online learning and stochastic optimization. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2011, 12: 2121-2159.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  52. Kingma D, Ba J. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv:1412.6980, 2014. https://arxiv.org/abs/1412.6980, Sept. 2016.

  53. Graves A, Wayne G, Danihelka I. Neural Turing machines. arXiv:1410.5401, 2014. https://arxiv.org/abs/1410.5401, Sept. 2016.

Download references

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Li Li.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(PDF 179 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hu, F., Li, L., Zhang, ZL. et al. Emphasizing Essential Words for Sentiment Classification Based on Recurrent Neural Networks. J. Comput. Sci. Technol. 32, 785–795 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11390-017-1759-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11390-017-1759-2

Keywords

Navigation