[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Modelling majority and expert influences on opinion formation in online social networks

  • Published:
World Wide Web Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two most important social influences that shape the opinion formation process are: (i) the majority influence caused by the existence of a large group of people sharing similar opinions and (ii) the expert influence originated from the presence of experts in a social group. When these two effects contradict each other in real life, they may pull the public opinions towards their respective directions. Existing models on opinion formation utilised the idea of expertise levels in conjunction with the expressed opinions of the agents to encapsulate the expert effect. However, they have disregarded the explicit consideration of the majority effect, and thereby failed to capture the concurrent and combined impact of these two influences on opinion evolution. To represent the majority and expert impacts, we explicitly use the concept of opinion consistency and expertise level consistency respectively in an innovative way by capitalizing the notion of entropy in measuring the homogeneity of a group. Consequently, our model successfully captures the opinion dynamics under the concomitant influence of majority and expert. We validate the efficacy of our model in capturing opinion dynamics in a real world scenario using the opinion evolution traces collected from a widely used online social network (OSN) platform. Moreover, simulation results reveal the impact of the aforementioned effects, and confirm that our model can properly capture the consensus, polarization and fragmentation properties of public opinion. Our model is also compared with some recent models to evaluate its performance in both real world and simulated environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://text-processing.com/

  2. https://textblob.readthedocs.io/en/dev/

  3. http://www.alchemyapi.com/products/alchemylanguage/keyword-extraction

References

  1. Asch, S.E.: Opinions and social pressure. Sci. Am. 193(5), 31–35 (1955)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bruza, B., Welsh, M., Navarro, D., Begg, S.: Does anchoring cause overconfidence only in experts? Cogn. Sci. Soc. 33, 1947–1952 (2011)

  3. Cha, M., Haddadi, H., Benevenuto, F., Gummadi, K.P.: Measuring user influence on twitter: The million follower fallacy. 4th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media 10, 10–17 (2010)

  4. Chacoma, A., Zanette, D.H.: Opinion formation by social influence: from experiments to modeling. PLoS ONE 10(10), e0140406 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cheng, Z., Caverlee, J., Barthwal, H., Bachani, V.: Who is the Barbecue King of Texas?: A Geo-spatial approach to finding local experts on twitter. SIGIR 335–344 (2014)

  6. Cho, J.-H., Swami, A.: Dynamics of uncertain opinions in social networks. IEEE Military Communications Conference 1627–1632 (2014)

  7. Clifford, P., Sudbury, A.: A model for spatial conflict. Biometrika 60(3), 581–588 (1973)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Crokidakis, N.: The influence of local majority opinions on the dynamics of the sznajd model. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 012016, 487 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Das, A., Gollapudi, S., Munagala, K.: Modeling opinion dynamics in social networks. WSDM 403–412 (2014)

  10. Das, R., Kamruzzaman, J., Karmakar, G.: Opinion formation dynamics under the combined influences of majority and experts. ICONIP 674–682 (2015)

  11. Deffuant, G., Neau, N., Amblard, F., Weisbuch, G.: Mixing beliefs among interacting agents. Adv. Compl. Syst. 3(1), 87–98 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. DeGroot, M.H.: Reaching a consensus. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 69(345), 118–121 (1974)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Galam, S.: Sociophysics: a review of galam models. Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 19(03), 409–440 (2008)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Ghosh, S., Sharma, N., Benevenuto, F., Ganguly, N., Gummadi, K.: Cognos: Crowdsourcing search for topic experts in microblogs. SIGIR 575–590 (2012)

  15. Hassan, R., Karmakar, G., Kamruzzaman, J.: Reputation and user requirement based price modelling for dynamic spectrum access. IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 13(9), 2128–2140 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hegselmann, R., Krause, U.: Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence: models, Analysis and Simulation. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 5(3), 1–24 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Javarone, M.A.: Social influences in opinion dynamics: the role of conformity. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 414, 19–30 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kurmyshev, E., Juarez, H.A., Gonzalez-Silva, R.A.: Dynamics of Bounded Confidence Opinion in Heterogeneous Social Networks: Concord against Partial Antagonism. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 390(16), 2945–2955 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Li, L., Scaglione, A., Swami, A., Zhao, Q.: Consensus, polarization and clustering of opinions in social networks. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 32(6), 1072–1083 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Liao, Q., Wagner, C., Pirolli, P., Fu, W.-T.: Understanding experts’ and novices’ expertise judgement of twitter users. Computer-Human Interaction(CHI) 2461–2464 (2012)

  21. Lima, F.W.S., Sousa, A.O., Sumuor, M.A.: Majority-vote model on directed Erdos-Renyi random graphs. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 387(14), 3503–3510 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Liu, B.: Sentiment Analysis - Mining Opinions, Sentiments, and Emotions. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 1–367 (2015)

  23. Martinez-Camara, E., Martin-Valdivia, M.T., Urena-Lopez, L.A., Montejo-Raez, A.: Sentiment Analysis in Twitter. Nat. Lang. Eng. 20(01), 1–28 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Moussaid, M., Kaemmer, J.E., Analytis, P.P., Neth, H.: Social influence and the collective dynamics of opinion formation. PLoS ONE 8(11), e78433 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Novak, S., Elster, J.: Majority Decisions: Principles and Practices. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 1–288 (2014)

  26. Pal, A., Counts, S.: Identifying topical authorities in microblogs. WSDM 45–54 (2011)

  27. Pang, B., Lee, L.: Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Found. Trends Inf. Retr. 2(1–2), 1–135 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Pineda, M., Toral, R., Hernandez-Garcia, E.: The noisy Hegselmann-Krause model for opinion dynamics. Eur. Phys. J. B 12(86), 1–12 (2013)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Varian, H.R.: Microeconomic Analysis. Norton, New York (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Varshney, K.R.: Bounded confidence opinion dynamics in a social network of bayesian decision makers. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Signal Process 8(4), 576–590 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Weng, J., Lim, E.P., Jiang, J., He, Q.: Twitterrank: finding topic-sensitive influential twitterers. WSDM 261–270 (2010)

  32. Xia, H., Wang, H., Xuan, Z.: Opinion dynamics: a multidisciplinary review and perspective on future research. Int. J. Knowl. Syst. Sci. 2(4), 72–91 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Xu, Z., Ramanathan, J.: Thread-based Probabilistic Models for Expert Finding in Enterprise Microblogs. Expert Syst. Appl. 43, 286–297 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhang, J., Hong, Y.: Opinion Evolution Analysis for Short-range and Long-range Deffuant-Weisbuch Models. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 392 (21), 5289–5297 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Information Technology, Monash University, Victoria, Australia

    Rajkumar Das, Joarder Kamruzzaman & Gour Karmakar

  2. School of Engineering and Information Technology, Federation University Australia, Victoria, Australia

    Joarder Kamruzzaman & Gour Karmakar

Authors
  1. Rajkumar Das
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Joarder Kamruzzaman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gour Karmakar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rajkumar Das.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Das, R., Kamruzzaman, J. & Karmakar, G. Modelling majority and expert influences on opinion formation in online social networks. World Wide Web 21, 663–685 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11280-017-0484-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11280-017-0484-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation