[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Achieving fair and accountable data trading for educational multimedia data based on blockchain

  • Published:
Wireless Networks Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Online education is popular for its flexibility and high accessibility. The transactions of educational multimedia data resources can effectively promote the development of educational informatization and solve the island situation of educational resources. However, educational resources may be facing severe illegal redistribution. And the copyright is not well protected. In most of existing transaction schemes for educational multimedia data, there is always a centralized third party, which may lead to dispute, distrust, or privacy issues. In this paper, we propose a fair and accountable trading scheme for educational multimedia data based on blockchain. We combine anti-collusion code named BIBD-ACC and asymmetric fingerprinting technology to achieve a relatively strong copyright protection. To realize a fair trading, we implement a smart contract with a reasonable pricing model. In addition, we leverage TEE to solve the privacy issues of public chain and IPFS to mitigate the storage cost of the blockchain. We implemented and evaluated the scheme in Ethereum. The results show that our scheme can achieve well copyright protection and preserve the users’ privacy. The overall overhead is reasonable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. MOOCs. (2022). Retrieved March 18, 2022, from http://mooc.org/.

  2. Coursera. (2022). Retrieved March 18, 2022, from https://www.coursera.org/.

  3. XuetangX. (2022). Retrieved March 18, 2022, from http://www.xuetangx.com/global.

  4. Zhao, H.L., Xu, Y.P., Yang, Y. (2014). Technology research of mobile internet digital rights management security authorization. In Proceedings of the 19th national youth communication academic conference (pp. 299–309).

  5. Shen, J. (2021). Blockchain technology and its applications in digital content copyright protection. In Proceedings of the 4th international conference on economic management and green development (pp. 18–25). Springer.

  6. Xianxian, L., Jiahui, P., Zhenkui, S., & Chunpei, L. (2021) Achieving fair and accountable data trading scheme for educational multimedia data based on blockchain. QSHINE 111–125.

  7. Savelyev, A. (2018). Copyright in the blockchain era: Promises and challenges. Computer Law Security Review, 34(3), 550–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tulyakov, S., Farooq, F., & Govindaraju, V. (2005). Symmetric hash functions for fingerprint minutiae. In International conference on pattern recognition and image analysis (pp. 30–38). Springer.

  9. Charpentier, A., Fontaine, C., Furon, T., et al. (2011) An asymmetric fingerprinting scheme based on Tardos codes. In International workshop on information hiding (pp. 43–58). Springer.

  10. Farooq, F., Bolle, R. M., & Jea, T. Y, et al. (2007). Anonymous and revocable fingerprint recognition. In 2007 IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (pp. 1–7). IEEE.

  11. Qureshi, A., Megias, D., & Rifa-Pous, H. (2015). Framework for preserving security and privacy in peer-to-peer content distribution systems. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(3), 1391–1408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu, Q., Safavi-Naini, R., & Sheppard, N. P. (2003) Digital rights management for content distribution. In Proceedings of the Australasian information security workshop conference on ACSW frontiers 2003 (Vol. 21, pp. 49–58).

  13. Ma, Z., Jiang, M., Gao, H., et al. (2018). Blockchain for digital rights management. Future Generation Computer Systems, 89, 746–764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kenny, S., & Korba, L. (2002). Applying digital rights management systems to privacy rights management. Computers Security, 21(7), 648–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Nakamoto, S. (2019). Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Manubot.

  16. Mermer, G. B., Zeydan, E., & Arslan, S. S. (2018) . An overview of blockchain technologies: Principles, opportunities and challenges. In 2018 26th signal processing and communications applications conference (SIU) (pp. 1–4). IEEE.

  17. Fullmer, D., & Morse, A. S. (2018). Analysis of difficulty control in bitcoin and proof-of-work blockchains. In 2018 IEEE conference on decision and control (CDC) (pp. 5988–5992). IEEE.

  18. Castro, M., & Liskov, B. (1999). Practical byzantine fault tolerance. OSDI, 99, 173–186.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang, C., Guo, Y., & Du, H. et al. (2020). Pfcrowd: Privacy-preserving and federated crowdsourcing framework by using blockchain. In 2020 IEEE/ACM 28th international symposium on quality of service (IWQoS) (pp. 1–10). IEEE.

  20. Guo, Y., Xie, H., & Miao, Y., et al. (2020). Fedcrowd: A federated and privacy-preserving crowdsourcing platform on blockchain. IEEE Transactions on Services Computing.

  21. Zhang, C., Guo, Y., Jia, X., et al. (2021). Enabling proxy-free privacy-preserving and federated crowdsourcing by using blockchain. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 8(8), 6624–6636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang, M., Guo, Y., & Zhang, C., et al. (2021). MedShare: a privacy-preserving medical data sharing system by using blockchain. IEEE Transactions on Services Computing.

  23. Li, Z., Kang, J., Yu, R., et al. (2017). Consortium blockchain for secure energy trading in industrial internet of things. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 14(8), 3690–3700.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Gai, K., Wu, Y., Zhu, L., et al. (2019). Privacy-preserving energy trading using consortium blockchain in smart grid. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 15(6), 3548–3558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Aitzhan, N. Z., & Svetinovic, D. (2016). Security and privacy in decentralized energy trading through multi-signatures, blockchain and anonymous messaging streams. IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, 15(5), 840–852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hu, D., Li, Y., Pan, L., et al. (2021). A blockchain-based trading system for big data. Computer Networks, 191, 107994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sheng, D., Xiao, M., & Liu A, et al. (2020). CPchain: A copyright-preserving crowdsourcing data trading framework based on blockchain. In 2020 29th international conference on computer communications and networks (ICCCN) (pp. 1–9). IEEE.

  28. Dai, W., Dai, C., Choo, K. K. R., et al. (2019). SDTE: A secure blockchain-based data trading ecosystem. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 15, 725–737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ren, K., Guo, Y., & Li, J., et al. (2020). Hybridx: New hybrid index for volume-hiding range queries in data outsourcing services. In 2020 IEEE 40th international conference on distributed computing systems (ICDCS) (pp. 23–33). IEEE.

  30. Cai, C., Zheng, Y., Du, Y., et al. (2019). Towards private, robust, and verifiable crowdsensing systems via public blockchains. IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, 18(4), 1893–1907.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Duan, H., Zheng, Y., & Du, Y., et al. (2019). Aggregating crowd wisdom via blockchain: A private, correct, and robust realization. In 2019 IEEE international conference on pervasive computing and communications (PerCom) (pp. 1–10). IEEE.

  32. Zhaoxiong, M., Tetsuya, M., & Sumiko, M. (2018). Hirotsugu kinoshita: Design scheme of copyright management system based on digital watermarking and blockchain. COMPSAC, 2, 359–364.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Huang, C., Liu, D., Ni, J., et al. (2020). Achieving accountable and efficient data sharing in industrial internet of things. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 17(2), 1416–1427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Chen, Z., Wang, Y., & Ni, T., et al. (2020). DCDChain: A credible architecture of digital copyright detection based on blockchain. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.01235

  35. Qureshi, A., & Megias, D. (2019) . Blockchain-based P2P multimedia content distribution using collusion-resistant fingerprinting. In 2019 Asia-Pacific signal and information processing association annual summit and conference (APSIPA ASC) (pp. 1606–1615). IEEE.

  36. Kuribayashi, M., & Funabiki, N. (2019). Decentralized tracing protocol for fingerprinting system. APSIPA Transactions on Signal and Information Processing 8.

  37. Underwood, S. (2016). Blockchain beyond bitcoin. Communications of the ACM, 59(11), 15–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Boneh, D., & Shaw, J. (1998). Collusion-secure fingerprinting for digital data. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 44(5), 1897–1905.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  39. Engle, S. (2005). Fingerprinting and the marking assumption. Ecs228 cryptography for E-commerce.

  40. Wade, T., Min, W. Z., Jane, W., et al. (2003). Anti-collusion-fingerprinting-for-multimedia. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 51(4), 1069–1087.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  41. Brasser, F., Müller, U., & Dmitrienko A., et al. (2017). Software grand exposure: SGX cache attacks are practical. In 11th USENIX workshop on offensive technologies (WOOT 17).

  42. Bowman, M., et al. (2018). Private data objects: An overview. arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.05686

  43. Benet J. (2014). Ipfs-content addressed, versioned, p2p file system. arXiv preprint arXiv:1407.3561

  44. Rubinstein, A. (1982) . Perfect equilibrium in a bargaining model. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 97–109.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work is partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 61672176), the Guangxi “Bagui Scholar” Teams for Innovation and Research Project, the Guangxi Science and technology project (GuikeAA22067070 and GuikeAD21220114), the Center for Applied Mathematics of Guangxi (Guangxi Normal University), the Guangxi Talent Highland Project of Big Data Intelligence and Application, the Guangxi Science and Technology Plan Projects No. AD20159039, the Guangxi Young and Middle-aged Ability Improvement Project No. 2020KY02032, the Innovation Project of Guangxi Graduate Education (No. YCBZ2021038).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Computer Science, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin, 530022, China

    Xianxian Li, Jiahui Peng, Shiqi Gao, Zhenkui Shi & Chunpei Li

Authors
  1. Xianxian Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jiahui Peng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shiqi Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zhenkui Shi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Chunpei Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Shiqi Gao or Zhenkui Shi.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, X., Peng, J., Gao, S. et al. Achieving fair and accountable data trading for educational multimedia data based on blockchain. Wireless Netw 30, 4389–4401 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-022-03042-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-022-03042-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation