[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Log in

Spectrum auction with interference constraint for cognitive radio networks with multiple primary and secondary users

  • Published:
Wireless Networks Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Extensive research in recent years has shown the benefits of cognitive radio technologies to improve the flexibility and efficiency of spectrum utilization. This new communication paradigm, however, requires a well-designed spectrum allocation mechanism. In this paper, we propose an auction framework for cognitive radio networks to allow unlicensed secondary users (SUs) to share the available spectrum of licensed primary users (PUs) fairly and efficiently, subject to the interference temperature constraint at each PU. To study the competition among SUs, we formulate a non-cooperative multiple-PU multiple-SU auction game and study the structure of the resulting equilibrium by solving a non-continuous two-dimensional optimization problem, including the existence, uniqueness of the equilibrium and the convergence to the equilibrium in the two auctions. A distributed algorithm is developed in which each SU updates its strategy based on local information to converge to the equilibrium. We also analyze the revenue allocation among PUs and propose an algorithm to set the prices under the guideline that the revenue of each PU should be proportional to its resource. We then extend the proposed auction framework to the more challenging scenario with free spectrum bands. We develop an algorithm based on the no-regret learning to reach a correlated equilibrium of the auction game. The proposed algorithm, which can be implemented distributedly based on local observation, is especially suited in decentralized adaptive learning environments as cognitive radio networks. Finally, through numerical experiments, we demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed auction framework in achieving high efficiency and fairness in spectrum allocation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In our study, we assume that SUs are honest, and indeed make the payments. We do not consider the issue of payment enforcement, which may require a separate mechanism and is beyond the scope of the paper.

  2. From the perspective of auction theory, the reserved bid β n set by PU n can be seen as a bid made by PU n. By bidding β n , PU n has a way of declaring a reservation value for its spectrum resource and prevents the possibility of the SUs colluding to purchase the resource for an arbitrarily small amount of money.

  3. For the sake of simplicity, in case of non-ambiguity, we note S i ((a * i b * i ), s i ) as a function of s i , i.e., S i (s i ) or S i (a * i b * i ).

  4. Throughout the paper, the inequality between two vectors is defined as the inequality in all components of the vectors.

  5. For the free band, there is no bidding game, or alternatively, we can define a dumb bidding game for the free band, at the NE of which each SU choosing the free band submits 0 as bid and the utility is given by (13).

  6. The rationale of the choice is that choosing the furthest PU causes the least interference at the PU.

References

  1. Chen, L., Iellamo, S., Coupechoux, M., & Godlewski, P. (March 2010). An auction framework for spectrum allocation with interference constraint in cognitive radio networks. In Proceedings of IEEE infocom.

  2. Haykin, S. (2005). Cognitive radio: Brain-empowered wireless communications. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 23(2), 201–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Buddhikot, M. (April 2007). Understanding dynamic spectrum access: Models, taxonomy and challenges. In Proceedings of. IEEE DySPAN.

  4. Spectrum policy task force report. (2002). Federal communications commission.

  5. Hart, S., & Mas-Colell, A. (2000). A simple adaptive procedure leading to correlated equilibrium. Econometrica, 68(5), 1127–1150

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Aumann, R. J. (1972). Subjectivity and correlation in randomized strategy. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 1(1), 67–96.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Krishna, V. (2002). Auction theory. Dordrecht: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zhou, X., & Zheng, H. (2009) Trust: A general framework for truthful double spectrum auctions. In Proceedings of IEEE infocom.

  9. Zhu, J., & Liu, K. J. R. (2008). Multi-stage pricing game for collusion-resistant dynamic spectrum allocation. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 26(1), 182–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kasbekar, G. S., & Sarkar, S. (2009). Spectrum auction framework for access allocation in cognitive radio networks. In Proceedings of ACM Mobihoc.

  11. Huang, J., Berry, R., & Honig M. L. (2006). Auction-based spectrum sharing. Mobile Networks and Applications (MONET), 11, 405–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gandhi, S., Buragohain, C., Cao, L., Zheng, H., & Suri. S. (April 2007). A general framework for wireless spectrum auctions. In Proceedings of IEEE DySPAN.

  13. Wu, Y., Wang, B., Liu, K. J. R., & Clancy, T. C. (2009). A scalable collusion-resistant multi-winner cognitive spectrum auction game. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 57(12), 3805–3816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhou, X., Gandhi, S., Suri, S., & Zheng, H. (2008). ebay in the sky: Strategy-proof wireless spectrum auctions. In Proceedings of ACM MobiCom.

  15. Zhou, X., & Zheng, H. (2010) Breaking bidder collusion in large-scale spectrum auctions. In Proceedibgs of ACM MobiHoc.

  16. Myerson, R. B. (1991). Game theory: Analysis of conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Rosen, J. B. (1965). Existence and uniqueness of equilibrium points for concave n-person games. Econometrica, 33(3), 520–534.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Srinivasan, R. (2008). IEEE 802.16m evaluation methodology document (EMD). IEEE.

  19. Jain, R., Chiu, D., & Hawe W. (1984). A quantitative measure of fairness and discrimination for resource allocation in shared computer systems. DEC Research Report TR-301.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the project TEROPP (technologies for TERminal in OPPortunistic radio applications) funded by the French National Research Agency (ANR). Part of the work was presented at the 29th IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (IEEE Infocom 2010) [1].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lin Chen.

Additional information

Part of this work is done when Stefano Iellamo was a master student in Department of Electronics and Information, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza L. da Vinci 32, Milan, Italy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, L., Iellamo, S., Coupechoux, M. et al. Spectrum auction with interference constraint for cognitive radio networks with multiple primary and secondary users. Wireless Netw 17, 1355–1371 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-011-0353-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-011-0353-8

Keywords

Navigation