Monocular Vision for Mobile Robot Localization and Autonomous Navigation

• Araújo, H., Carceroni, R.J., and Brown, C.M. 1998. A fully projective formulation to improve the accuracy of Lowe’s pose estimation algorithm. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 70(2):227–238.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Argyros, A., Bekris, K., Orphanoudakis, S., and Kavraki, L. 2005. Robot homing by exploiting panoramic vision. Journal of Autonomous Robots, 19(1):7–25.

  Google Scholar 

• Blanc, G., Mezouar, Y., and Martinet, P. 2005. Indoor navigation of a wheeled mobile robot along visual routes. In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, ICRA’05, Barcelonne, Espagne.

• Cobzas, D., Zhang, H., and Jagersand, M. 2003. Image-based localization with depth-enhanced image map. In International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

• Davison, A.J. 2003. Real-time simultaneous localisation and mapping with a single camera. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer Vision, Nice.

• de Wit, C.C., Siciliano, B., and Bastin, G. 1996. The Zodiac, Theory of Robot Control. Springer Verlag.

• Faugeras, O. and Herbert, M. 1986. The representation, recognition, and locating of 3-d objects. International Journal of Robotic Research, 5(3):27–52.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Fischler, O. and Bolles, R. 1981. Random sample consensus: A paradigm for model fitting with application to image analysis and automated cartography. Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery, 24:381–395.

  Google Scholar 

• Georgiev, A. and Allen, P.K. 2004. Localization methods for a mobile robot in urban environments. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 20(5):851–864.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Goedemé, T., Tuytelaars, T., Van Gool, L., Vanacker, G., and Nuttin, M. 2005. Feature based omnidirectional sparse visual following. In International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 1003–1008.

• Haralick, R., Lee, C., Ottenberg, K., and Nolle, M. 1994. Review and analysis of solutions of the three point perspective pose estimation problem. International Journal of Computer Vision, 13(3):331–356.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Harris, C. and Stephens, M. 1988. A combined corner and edge detector. In Alvey Vision Conference, pp. 147–151.

• Hartley, R. and Zisserman, A. 2000. Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision. Cambridge University Press.

• Kidono, K., Miura, J., and Shirai, Y. 2002. Autonomous visual navigation of a mobile robot using a human-guided experience. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 40(2–3):124–1332.

  Google Scholar 

• Lavest, J.M., Viala, M., and Dhome, M. 1998. Do we need an accurate calibration pattern to achieve a reliable camera calibration ? In European Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 158–174.

• Lhuillier, M. and Perriollat, M. 2006. Uncertainty ellipsoids calculations for complex 3d reconstructions. In International Conference on Robotic and Automation.

• Matsumoto, Y., Inaba, M., and Inoue, H. 1996. Visual navigation using view-sequenced route representation. In International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 83–88.

• Nistér, D. 2001. Frame decimation for structure and motion. In 2nd Workshop on Structure from Multiple Images of Large Environments, Springer Lecture Notes on Computer Science, vol. 2018, pp. 17–34.

• Nistér, D. 2003. An efficient solution to the five-point relative pose problem. In Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 147–151.

• Nistér, D., Naroditsky, O., and Bergen, J. 2004. Visual odometry. In Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 652–659.

• Remazeilles, A., Chaumette, F., and Gros, P. 2004. Robot motion control from a visual memory. In International Conference on Robotics and Automation, vol. 4, pp. 4695–4700.

• Royer, E., Bom, J., Dhome, M., Thuilot, B., Lhuillier, M., and Marmoiton, F. 2005a. Outdoor autonomous navigation using monocular vision. In International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 3395–3400.

• Royer, E., Lhuillier, M., Dhome, M., and Chateau, T. 2005b. Localization in urban environments: Monocular vision compared to a differential gps sensor. In International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR.

• Royer, E., Lhuillier, M., Dhome, M., and Lavest, J.-M. 2005c. Performance evaluation of a localization system relying on monocular vision and natural landmarks. In Proceedings of the ISPRS Workshop BenCOS (Towards Benchmarking Automated Calibration, Orientation and Surface Reconstruction from Images).

• Samson, C. 1995. Control of chained systems. application to path following and time-varying point stabilization of mobile robots. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 40.

• Se, S., Lowe, D., and Little, J. 2002. Mobile robot localization and mapping with uncertainty using scale-invariant visual landmarks. International Journal of Robotic Research, 21(8):735–760.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Simond, N. and Rives, P. 2004. Trajectography of an uncalibrated stereo rig in urban environments. In International Conference on Intelligent Robot and System, pp. 3381–3386.

• Thuilot, B., Bom, J., Marmoiton, F., and Martinet, P. 2004. Accurate automatic guidance of an urban vehicle relying on a kinematic gps sensor. In Symposium on Intelligent Autonomous Vehicles IAV04.

• Torr, P., Fitzgibbon, A., and Zisserman, A. 1999. The problem of degeneracy in structure and motion recovery from uncalibrated image sequences. International Journal of Computer Vision, 32(1):27–44.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Triggs, B., McLauchlan, P., Hartley, R., and Fitzgibbon, A. 2000. Bundle adjustment—A modern synthesis. In Vision Algorithms: Theory and Practice, W. Triggs, A. Zisserman, and R. Szeliski (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 298–375. Springer Verlag.

• Vacchetti, L., Lepetit, V., and Fua, P. 2003. Stable 3-d tracking in real-time using integrated context information. In Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Madison, WI.

Download references