Partial Linear Gaussian Models for Tracking in Image Sequences Using Sequential Monte Carlo Methods

• Anderson, B.D.O. and Moore, J.B. 1979. Optimal Filtering. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Arnaud, E. and Mémin, E. 2004. Optimal importance sampling for tracking in image sequences: application to point tracking. In European Conference on Computer Vision, Vol. 3, pp. 302–314.

  Google Scholar 

• Arnaud, E., Mémin, E., and Cernuschi-Frías, B. 2005. Conditional filters for image sequence based tracking—application to point tracking. IEEE Transactions of Image Processing, 14(1):63–79.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Arulampalam, M.S., Maskell, S., Gordon, N., and Clapp, T. 2002. A tutorial on particles filters for online Gaussian Bayesian tracking. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 50(2):174–18.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Aschwanden, P. and Guggenbül, W. 1992. Experimental results from a comparative study on correlation type registration algorithms. In Robust Computer Vision: Quality of Vision Algorithms, Förstner and Ruwiedel, (Ed.), Wichmann, pp. 268–282.

• Bar-Shalom, Y. and Li, X.-R. 1995. Multitarget-Multisensor Tracking: Principles and Techniques. Artech House Publishers.

• Bilmes, J. 1997. A gentle tutorial on the em algorithm and its application to parameter estimation for gaussian mixture and hidden markov models. Technical report, University of Berkeley.

• Black, M. and Anandan, P. 1996. The robust estimation of multiple motions: Parametric and piecewise-smooth flow fields. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 63(1):75–104.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Black, M. and Fleet, D. 1999. Probabilistic detection and tracking of motion discontinuities. In International Conference on Computer Vision, Vol. 2, pp. 551–558.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Blake, A., North, B., and Isard, M. 1999. Learning multi-class dynamics. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 11:389–395.

  Google Scholar 

• Brand, M. 2001. Morphable 3d models from video. In Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

• Breidt, F.J. and Carriquiry, A.L. 2000. Highest density gates for target tracking. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 36:46–55.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Casella, G. and Robert, C. 1996. Rao-Blackwelisation of sampling schemes. Biometrika, 83(1):81–94.

  Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Chen, R. and Liu, J.S. 2000. Mixture Kalman filters. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Serie B, 62(3):493–508.

  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Comaniciu, D., Ramesh, V., and Meer, P. 2003. Kernel-based object tracking. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 25(5):564–574.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cuzol, A. and Mémin, E. 2005. A stochastic filter for fluid motion tracking. In International Conference on Computer Vision.

• Doucet, A., de Freitas, N., and Gordon, N. (Eds.) 2001. Sequential Monte Carlo Methods in Practice. Springer-Verlag, New York. Series Statistics for Engineering and Information Science.

• Doucet, A., de Freitas, N., Murphy, K., and Russell, S. 2000. Rao-Blackwellised particle filtering for dynamic Bayesian networks. In Conference on Uncertaincy in Artificial Intelligence.

• Doucet, A., Godsill, S., and Andrieu, C. 2000. On sequential Monte Carlo sampling methods for Bayesian filtering. Statistics and Computing, 10(3):197–208.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Faugeras, O. and Lustman, F. 1988. Motion and structure from motion in a piecewise planar environment. Technical report, INRIA, Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et Automatique.

• Godsill, S. and Clapp, T. 2001. Improvement strategies for Monte Carlo particle filters. In Doucet01, chapter 7. Springer-Verlag.

• Gordon, N. 1997. A hybrid Bootstrap filter for target tracking in clutter. IEEE Transactions in Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 33(1):353–358.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Gordon, N., Salmond, D., and Smith, A. 1993. Novel approach to Gaussian Bayesian state estimation. IEEE Proceedings-F, 140(2):107–113.

  Google Scholar 

• Gustafsson, F., Gunnarsson, F., Bergman, N., Forssell, U., Jansson, J., Karlsson, R., and Nordlund, P.-J. 2002. Particle filters for positioning, navigation and tracking. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 50(2):425–437.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Harris, C. and Stephens, M. 1988. A combined corner and edge detector. In Proceedings of the Alvey Vision Conference, pp. 147–151.

• Hinkley, D. 1971. Inference about the change-point from cumulative sum tests. Biometrika, 58(509–523).

  Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Isard, M. and Blake, A. 1998. Condensation—conditional density propagation for visual tracking. International Journal of Computer Vision, 29(1):5–28.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Isard, M. and Blake, A. 1998. A mixed-state condensation tracker with automatic model-switching. In International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 107–112.

• Jepson, A., Fleet, D., and El-Maraghi, T. 2001. Robust online appearance models for visual tracking. In Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Vol. 1, pp. 415–422.

  Google Scholar 

• Khan, Z., Balch, T., and Dellaert, F. 2004. A Rao-Blackwellized particle filter for eigentracking. In Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Vol. 2, pp. 980–986.

  Google Scholar 

• Kong, A., Liu, J.S., and Wong, W.H. 1994. Sequential imputations and Bayesian missing data problems. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 89:278–288.

  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Kwok, C., Fox, D., and Meilă, M. 2004. Real-time particle filter. Proceedings of the IEEE (issue on State Estimation) 92(2).

• Liu, J.S. and Chen, R. 1998. Sequential Monte Carlo methods for dynamic systems. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 93:1032–1044.

  Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Ma, B. and Ellis, R.E. 2004. Surface-based registration with a particle filter. In Procedings of Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention.

• Marrs, A., Maskell, S., and Bar-Shalom, Y. 2002. Expected likelihood for tracking in clutter with particle filters. In SPIE Conference on Signal and Data Processing of Small Targets.

• Musso, C., Oudjane, N., and Le Gland, F. 2001. Improving regularised particle filters. In Doucet01, chapter 12. Springer-Verlag.

• Nguyen, H.T., Worring, M., and van den Boomgaard, R. 2001. Occlusion robust adaptative template tracking. In International Conference on Computer Vision, Vol. 1, pp. 678–683.

  Google Scholar 

• North, B. and Blake, A. 1998. Learning dynamical models using Expectation-Maximisation. In International Conference on Computer Vision.

• Odobez, J.-M. and Bouthemy, P. 1995. Robust multiresolution estimation of parametric motion models. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation, 6(4):348–365.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Okuma, K., Taleghani, A., De Freitas, N., Little, J., and Lowe, D. 2004. A boosted particle filter: multitarget detection and tracking. In European Conference on Computer Vision.

• Pitt, M. and Shephard, M. 2001. Auxiliary variable based particle filters. In Doucet01, chapter 13. Springer-Verlag.

• Pérez, P., Hue, C., and Gangnet, M. 2002. Color-based probabilistic tracking. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 661–675.

• Pérez, P., Vermaak, J., and Blake, A. 2004. Data fusion for visual tracking with particles. In Proceedings of the IEEE (Issue on State Estimation), 92(3):495–513.

  Google Scholar 

• Rittscher, J. and Blake, A. 1999. Classification of human body motion. In International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 634–639.

• Rui, Y. and Chen, Y. 2001. Better proposal distributions: object tracking using unscented particle filter. In Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Vol. 2, pp. 786–793.

  Google Scholar 

• Shi, J. and Tomasi, C. 1994. Good features to track. In Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 593–600.

• Sidenbladh, H., Black, M., and Sigal, L. 2002. Implicit probabilistic models of human motion for synthesis and tracking. In European Conference on Computer Vision, Vol. 1, pp. 784–800.

  Google Scholar 

• Sivic, J., Schaffalizky, F., and Zisserman, A. 2004. Object lovel grouping for video shots. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 85–98.

• Sminchisescu, C. and Triggs, B. 2002. Hyperdynamic importance sampling. In European Conference on Computer Vision.

• Sullivan, J. and Rittscher, J. 2001. Guiding random particles by deterministic search. In International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 323–330.

• Tissainayagam, P. and Suter, D. 2004. Assessing the performance of corner detectors for point feature tracking applications. Image and Vision Computing, 22(8):663–679.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Torresani, L. and Bregler, C. 2002. Space-time tracking. In European Conference on Computer Vision.

• van der Merwe, R., Doucet, A., de Freitas, N., and Wan, E. 2000. The unscented particle filter. Technical report cued/f-infeng/tr 380, University of Cambridge, Engineering Department.

• Vermaak, J., Andrieu, C., Doucet, A., and Godsill, S.J. 2002. Particle methods for Bayesian modeling and enhancement of speech signals. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, 10(3):173–185.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Vermaak, J., Godsill, S.J., and Pérez, P. 2005. Monte Carlo filtering for multi-target tracking and data association. IEEE Transations on Aerospace and Electronic Systems 41(1):309–332.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Vermaak, J., Pérez, P., Gangnet, M., and Blake, A. 2002. Towards improved observation models for visual tracking: selective adaptation. In European Conference on Computer Vision, Vol. 1, pp. 645–660.

  Google Scholar 

• Wan, E.A. and van der Merwe, R. 2000. The unscented kalman filter for nonlinear estimation. In IEEE Symposium on Adaptive Systems for Signal Processing, Communication and Control.

• Wu, Y. and Huang, T. 2004. Robust vision tracking by integrating multiple cues based on co-inference learning. International Journal of Computer Vision, 58(1):55–71.

  Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references