[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Log in

Joint mode selection and resource allocation in D2D communication based underlaying cellular networks

  • Published:
Telecommunication Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Device-to-Device (D2D) communication technology, under the standardization of third generation partnership project and a component of the evolving fifth generation architecture, is mainly aimed to increase system capacity and data rate via providing direct communications between end devices without the use of routing data through the network. Apart from the attracting features, due to the resource sharing between cellular user equipment (CUE) and D2D user equipment (DUE) in such communications, an efficient algorithm for resource and power allocation to DUE, especially for mobile users is necessary to maintain the performance. The current paper introduces a joint mode algorithm for mobile user to choose between cellular and D2D communications and thereby, analyzes resource allocation issues. We propose an efficient algorithm for mobility management of users based on their current connection modes. The locations of D2D pairs are estimated by Levenberg–Marquardt method based on the received signal strength (RSS) from different macrocells. Since the range of D2D communication is much shorter than that of cellular communication, in order to prevent ping-pong handoffs between cellular and D2D modes, we propose the estimation of the next RSS samples in cellular mode prior to switching to D2D mode. In both cellular and D2D modes, the allocated resource block (RB) is the one with the highest signal to interference plus noise ratio (SINR) in order to increase the throughput, under the condition of providing minimum SINR requirement of CUE. This is achieved via transmission power control of the D2D pair. For performance evaluation, we studied the effects of increasing velocity of D2D and cellular users, number of users, and SINR threshold. The results indicate that the proposed solution fairly manages the communication mode of mobile users and incurs improvement in system throughput.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Sapakal, M. R. S., & Kadam, M. S. S. (2013). 5G mobile technology. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Engineering & Technology (IJARCET), 2, 568–571.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Andrews, J. G., Buzzi, S., Choi, W., Hanly, S. V., Lozano, A., Soong, A. C., et al. (2014). What will 5G be? IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 32, 1065–1082.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Phunchongharn, P., Hossain, E., & Kim, D. I. (2013). Resource allocation for device-to-device communications underlaying LTE-advanced networks. IEEE Wireless Communications, 20, 91–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Asadi, A., Wang, Q., & Mancuso, V. (2014). A survey on device-to-device communication in cellular networks. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 16, 1801–1819.

  5. Mumtaz, S., & Rodriguez, J. (2014). Smart device to smart device communication. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Xu, X., Zhang, Y., Sun, Z., Hong, Y., & Tao, X. (2016). Analytical modeling of mode selection for moving D2D-enabled cellular networks. IEEE Communication Letters, 20, 1203–1206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Morattab, A., Dziong, Z., Sohraby, K., & Islam, M. H. (2016). Mobility impact on mode selection map in D2D networks—An analytical approach. In 2016 IEEE wireless communications and networking conference (WCNC) (pp. 1–6).

  8. Chen, H.-Y., Shih, M.-J., & Wei, H.-Y. (2015). Handover mechanism for device-to-device communication. In 2015 IEEE conference on standards for communications and networking (CSCN) (pp. 72–77).

  9. Zhu, F., & McNair, J. (2004). Optimizations for vertical handoff decision algorithms. In 2004 IEEE wireless communications and networking conference (pp. 867–872), 2004. WCNC

  10. Ahmed, T., Kyamakya, K., & Ludwig, M. (2006). Design and implementation of a context-aware decision algorithm for heterogeneous networks. In Proceedings of the 2006 ACM symposium on applied computing (pp. 1134–1138).

  11. Yang, K., Gondal, I., & Qiu, B. (2008). Context aware vertical soft handoff algorithm for heterogeneous wireless networks. In IEEE 68th vehicular technology conference (pp. 1–5), 2008. VTC 2008-Fall.

  12. Nadembega, A., Hafid, A., & Taleb, T. (2015). Mobility-prediction-aware bandwidth reservation scheme for mobile networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 64, 2561–2576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Nadembega, A., Hafid, A., & Taleb, T. (2014). An integrated predictive mobile-oriented bandwidth-reservation framework to support mobile multimedia streaming. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 13, 6863–6875.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Abu-Ghazaleh, H., & Alfa, A. S. (2010). Application of mobility prediction in wireless networks using markov renewal theory. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 59, 788–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tang, Y.-L., Deng, D.-J., Yuan, Y., Lin, C.-C., & Huang, Y.-M. (2010). Dividing sensitive ranges based mobility prediction algorithm in wireless networks. In Proceedings of the 6th international wireless communications and mobile computing conference (pp. 1223–1227).

  16. Wu, D., Zhou, L., Cai, Y., Hu, R., & Qian, Y. (2014). The role of mobility for D2D communications in LTE-advanced networks: Energy vs. bandwidth efficiency. IEEE Wireless Communications, 21, 66–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yilmaz, O. N., Li, Z., Valkealahti, K., Uusitalo, M., Moisio, M., Lundén, et al., P. (2014). Smart mobility management for D2D communications in 5G networks. In 2014 IEEE wireless communications and networking conference workshops (WCNCW) (pp. 219–223).

  18. Xia, L., Jiang, L.-G., & He, C. (2007). A novel fuzzy logic vertical handoff algorithm with aid of differential prediction and pre-decision method. In 2007 IEEE international conference on communications (pp. 5665–5670).

  19. Aghalya, S., & Seethalakshmi, P. (2012). Prediction based vertical handoff decision algorithm in heterogeneous wireless networks. International Journal of Computer Science Engineering and Technology (IJCSET), 2, 813–816.

  20. Sobhi-Givi, S., Khazali, A., Kalbkhani, H., Shayesteh, M. G., & Solouk, V. (2016). Resource allocation and power control for underlay device-to-device communication in fractional frequency reuse cellular networks. Telecommunication Systems. doi:10.1007/s11235-016-0256-1.

  21. Qiu, X., & Chawla, K. (1999). On the performance of adaptive modulation in cellular systems. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 47, 884–895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Nguyen, A. D., Sénac, P., Ramiro, V., & Diaz, M. (2011). STEPS-an approach for human mobility modeling. In Networking 2011 (pp. 254–265), Springer.

  23. Zeytinci, M. B., Sari, V., Harmanci, F. K., Anarim, E., & Akar, M. (2013). Location estimation using RSS measurements with unknown path loss exponents. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, 2013, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lourakis, M., & Argyros, A. A. (2005). Is Levenberg–Marquardt the most efficient optimization algorithm for implementing bundle adjustment? In Tenth IEEE international conference on computer vision (ICCV’05) (Vol. 1, pp. 1526–1531).

  25. Kalbkhani, H., Yousefi, S., & Shayesteh, M. G. (2014). Adaptive handover algorithm in heterogeneous femtocellular networks based on received signal strength and signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio prediction. IET Communications, 8, 3061–3071.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kim, T.-S., Lee, K.-H., Ryu, S., & Cho, C.-H. (2013). Resource allocation and power control scheme for interference avoidance in an LTE-Advanced cellular networks with device-to-device communication. International Journal of Control and Automation, 6, 181–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Liu, W., Yang, Y., Peng, T., & Wang, W. (2014). Optimal resource allocation scheme for satisfying the data rate requirement in hybrid network of D2D-cellular. Journal of Computers, 9, 1218–1225.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lee, N., Lin, X., Andrews, J. G., & Heath, R. (2015). Power control for D2D underlaid cellular networks: Modeling, algorithms, and analysis. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 33, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Haykin, S., & Widrow, B. (2003). Least-mean-square adaptive filters. USA: John Wiley & Sons.

  30. Zhao, R., & Fan, J. (2016). Global complexity bound of the Levenberg–Marquardt method. Optimization Methods and Software, 31, 805–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Azadeh Khazali.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sobhi-Givi, S., Khazali, A., Kalbkhani, H. et al. Joint mode selection and resource allocation in D2D communication based underlaying cellular networks. Telecommun Syst 67, 47–62 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-017-0320-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-017-0320-5

Keywords

Navigation