[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Mobility management with distributed mobility routing functions

  • Published:
Telecommunication Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Currently, IP mobility management solutions standardized by IETF rely on a centralized and static mobility approach, whereby a central mobility anchor manages mobility signaling and data traffic forwarding. All data traffic sent to a mobile node (MN) traverse the central mobility anchor regardless the current point of attachment of the MN in the Internet. Consequently, the packets follow a non-optimal path via the central mobility anchor which is typically located in the MN’s home network, and result to increase in packet delivery latency. This paper discusses a distributed mobility management mechanism that releases the burden of the central mobility anchor by splitting the mobility management functions of the mobility anchor and co-locating the mobility routing function at the gateway of each sub-network. This mechanism optimizes the data path of the MN that has moved to visited networks, which reduces the packet delivery latency. Moreover, the mechanism is extended to achieve seamless handover when the MN moves between visited networks. Through simulation under NS-2, the performance of the packet delivery latency, handover delay and packet loss is studied and analyzed with respect to varying network load and increasing distance of the MN’s home network from the visited networks. Simulation results show the improvement in packet delivery latency as compared to using non-optimized paths. Moreover, the results also verify the achievement of seamless handover when an MN moves between visited networks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Abbreviations

AR:

Access Router

CBR:

Constant Bit Rate

CN:

Correspondent Node

CoA:

Care-of-Address

DMM:

Distributed Mobility Management

DS-MIPv6:

Dual Stack Mobile IP version 6

GSM:

Global System for Mobile Communications

GW:

Gateway Router

HA:

Home Agent

HNP:

Home Network Prefix

HoA:

Home Address

IETF:

Internet Engineering Task Force

IP:

Internet Protocol

LM:

Internetwork Location Management

LMA:

Local Mobility Anchor

MAG:

Mobile Access Gateway

MIPv6:

Mobile IP version 6

MN:

Mobile Node

MR:

Mobility Routing

NIST:

National Institute of Standard and Technology

NS-2:

Network Simulator Version 2

NEMO:

Network Mobility

Net:

Network

PMIPv6:

Proxy Mobile IP version 6

POA:

Point of Attachment

PSTN:

Public Switched Telephone Network

TCP:

Transmission Control Protocol

TMAG:

Tracking Mobile Access Gateway

UDP:

User Datagram Protocol

UMTS:

Universal Mobile Telecommunication System

References

  1. Bertin, P., Bonjour, S., & Bonnin, J.-M. (2008). A distributed dynamic mobility management scheme designed for flat IP architectures. In New Technologies, Mobility and Security (NTMS ’08) (pp. 1–5).

  2. Bertin, P., Bonjour, S., & Bonnin, J.-M. (2009). Distributed or centralized mobility? In IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (GLOBECOM) (pp. 1–6).

  3. Bertin, P., Bonjour S., & Bonnin J.-M. (2009). An evaluation of dynamic mobility anchoring. In IEEE 70th vehicular technology conference fall (VTC 2009-Fall) (pp. 1–5).

  4. Chan, H. A. (2010). Proxy mobile IP with distributed mobility anchors. In IEEE GLOBECOM Workshops (GC Wkshps) (pp. 16–20).

  5. Chan, H. A. (2012). Distributed mobility management with mobile IP. In International communication conference (ICC), workshop on telecommunications: From research to standards (pp. 6850–6854).

  6. Chan, H. A., Yokota, H., Xie, J., Seite, P., & Liu, D. (2011). Distributed and dynamic mobility management in mobile Internet: Current Approaches and Issues. Journal of Communications, 6(1), 4–15.

  7. Cisco Visual Networking Index: Global Mobile Data Traffic Forecast Update, 2011–2016. White Paper (February 2012). http://www.cisco.com/en/US/solutions/collateral/ns341/ns525/ns537/ns705/ns827/white_paper_c11-520862.html.

  8. Devarapalli, V., Wakikawa, R., Petrescu, A., & Thubert, P. (January 2005). Network mobility (NEMO) basic support protocol. IETF RFC 3963 (proposed standard).

  9. Distributed Mobility Management. http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/dmm/.

  10. Ernest, P. P., Chan, H. A., & Falowo, O. E. (2012). Distributed mobility management scheme with mobility routing function at the gateways. In IEEE global communications conference (GLOBECOM) (pp. 5254–5259).

  11. Giust, F., De La Oliva, A., Bernardos, C. J., & Da Costa, R. P. F. (2011). A network-based localized mobility solution for distributed mobility management. In: Wireless personal multimedia communications (WPMC), international workshop on mobility for flat networks (MMFN), 2011 (pp. 1–5).

  12. Giust, F., De La Oliva, A., & Bernardos, C. J. (2011). Flat access and mobility architecture: An IPv6 distributed client mobility management solution. In IEEE conference on computer communications workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS) (pp. 361–366).

  13. Gundavelli, S., Leung, K., Devarapalli, V., Chowdhury K., & Patil, B. (August 2008). Proxy Mobile IPv6. IETF RFC 5213 (proposed standard).

  14. Johnson, D., Perkins, C., & Arkko J. (July 2011). Mobility Support for IPv6. IETF RFC 6275 (proposed standard).

  15. Lee, K.-H., Lee, H.-W., Ryu, W., & Han, Y.-H. (2011). A scalable network-based mobility management framework in heterogeneous IP-based networks. Telecommunication Systems. doi:10.1007/s11235-011-9479-3.

  16. Li, C.-S., Lin, F., & Chao, H.-C. (2009). Routing optimization over network mobility with distributed home agents as the cross layer consideration. Telecommunication Systems, 42, 63–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nascimento, A., Sofia, R., Condeixa, T., & Sargento, S. (2012). A decoupling approach for distributed mobility management. In the 21st international conference on computer communications and networks (ICCCN) (pp. 1–6).

  18. NS-2 Network Simulator. http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns.

  19. Park, W., Choi, J., & Kim, B. (2007). Scheme for improving transmission performance of realtime traffic using priority queues in HMIPv6. Telecommunication Systems, 36, 3–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pentikousis, K., Zhou, Q., & Wang, H. (2011). Design considerations for mobility management in future infrastructure networks. In Telecom World (ITU WT), Technical Symposium at ITU (pp. 87–92).

  21. PMIPv6 for NS-2 patch and required packages. Accessed October 2012. http://commani.net/pmip6ns/download.html.

  22. Sadhukhan, P., Das, P. K., & Saha, S. (2011). Hybrid mobility management scheme integrating mobile IP and SIP for seamless invocation of service in All-IP network. Telecommunication Systems. doi:10.1007/s11235-011-9483-7.

  23. Soliman, H. (ed.) (June 2009). Mobile IPv6 support for dual stack hosts and routers. IETF RFC 5555 (proposed standard).

  24. Soliman, H., Castelluccia, C., ElMalki, K., & Bellier, L. (October 2008). Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 (HMIPv6) Mobility Management. IETF RFC 5380 (proposed standard).

  25. Thomson, S., Narten, T., & Jinmei, T. (September 2007). IPv6 stateless autoconfiguration. IETF RFC 4862 (proposed standard).

  26. Vasilache, A., Li, J., & Kameda, H. (2003). Threshold-based load balancing for multiple home agents in mobile IP networks. Telecommunication Systems, 22(1–4), 11–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wakikawa, R., Valadon, G., & Murai, J. (2006). Migrating home agents towards internet-scale mobility deployments. In Proceedings of ACM conference on future networking technologies (CoNEXT’06).

  28. Zhang, L., Wakikawa, R., & Zhu, Z. (2009). Support mobility in the global internet. In 1st ACM workshop on mobile internet through cellular networks ( MICNET’09) (pp. 1–6).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, 7701, South Africa

    Petro Pesha Ernest & Olabisi Emmanuel Falowo

  2. Futurewei Technologies, 5340 Legacy Dr. Building 3, Plano, TX, 75024, USA

    H. Anthony Chan

  3. University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 9201 University City Boulevard, Charlotte, NC, 28223-0001, USA

    Jiang Xie

Authors
  1. Petro Pesha Ernest
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. H. Anthony Chan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jiang Xie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Olabisi Emmanuel Falowo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Petro Pesha Ernest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ernest, P.P., Chan, H.A., Xie, J. et al. Mobility management with distributed mobility routing functions. Telecommun Syst 59, 229–246 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-014-9958-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-014-9958-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation