[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

A Simple Logical Matrix and Sequent Calculus for Parry’s Logic of Analytic Implication

  • Published:
Studia Logica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We provide a logical matrix semantics and a Gentzen-style sequent calculus for the first-degree entailments valid in W. T. Parry’s logic of Analytic Implication. We achieve the former by introducing a logical matrix closely related to that inducing paracomplete weak Kleene logic, and the latter by presenting a calculus where the initial sequents and the left and right rules for negation are subject to linguistic constraints.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Avron, A., The semantics and proof theory of linear logic, Theoretical Computer Science 57(2-3):161–184, 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Avron, A., Simple consequence relations, Information and Computation 92(1):105–139, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bochvar, D., On a Three-Valued Calculus and its Application in the Analysis of the Paradoxes of the Extended Functional Calculus, Matematicheskii Sbornik 4:287–308, 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bonzio, S., J. Gil-Ferez, F. Paoli, and L. Peruzzi, On Paraconsistent Weak Kleene, logic: Axiomatization and Algebraic Analysis, Studia Logica 105(2):253–297, 2017.

  5. Bonzio, S., A. Loi, and L. Peruzzi, A Duality for Involutive Bisemilattices, Studia Logica 107(2): 423–444, 2019.

  6. Bonzio, S., T. Moraschini, and M. Pra Baldi, Logics of left variable inclusion and Płonka sums matrices, Reports on Mathematical Logic, forthcoming.

  7. Bonzio, S., and M. Pra Baldi, Containment logics and Płonka sums of matrices typescript.

  8. Chemla, E., P. Égré, and B. Spector, Characterizing logical consequence in many-valued logic, Journal of Logic and Computation 27(7):2193–2226, 2017.

  9. Ciuni, R., and M. Carrara, Characterizing Logical Consequence in Paraconsistent Weak Kleene, in L. Felline, A. Ledda, F. Paoli, and E. Rossanese, (eds.), New Directions in Logic and the Philosophy of Science, College Publications, London, 2016, pp. 165–176.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ciuni, R., and M. Carrara, Semantical analysis of weak Kleene logics, Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 29(1):1–36, 2019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ciuni, R., T. M. Ferguson, and D. Szmuc, Relevant Logics Obeying Component Homogeneity, Australasian Journal of Logic 15(2):301–361, 2018.

  12. Ciuni, R., T. M. Ferguson, and D. Szmuc, Logics based on Linear Orders of Contaminating Values, Journal of Logic and Computation 29(5):631–663, 2019.

  13. Ciuni, R., T. M. Ferguson, and D. Szmuc, Modeling the Interaction of Computer Errors by Four-Valued Contaminating Logics, in R. Iemhoff, M. Moortgat, and R. de Queiroz, (eds.), Proceedings of the 26th International Workshop on Logic, Language, Information, and Computation (WoLLIC 2019), Springer, Berlin, 2019, pp. 119–139.

  14. Coniglio, M., and M. I. Corbalán, Sequent calculi for the classical fragment of Bochvar and Halldén’s Nonsense Logics, in Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Logical and Semantic Frameworks with Applications (LSFA), 2012, pp. 125–136.

  15. Da Ré, B., F. Pailos, and D. Szmuc, Theories of truth based on four-valued infectious logics. Logic Journal of the IGPL 28(5):712–746, 2020.

  16. Epstein, R., The Semantic Foundations of Logic, Volume I: Propositional Logics, 2nd edition, Oxford University Press, New York, 1995.

  17. Ferguson, T. M., A computational interpretation of conceptivism, Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 24(4):333–367, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ferguson, T. M., Logics of nonsense and Parry systems, Journal of Philosophical Logic 44(1):65–80, 2015.

  19. Ferguson, T. M., Faulty Belnap computers and subsystems of FDE, Journal of Logic and Computation 26(5):1617–1636, 2016.

  20. Ferguson, T. M., Meaning and Proscription in Formal Logic: Variations on the Propositional Logic of William T. Parry, Springer, Dordrecht, 2017.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Fine, K., Analytic implication, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 27(2):169–179, 1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Fine, K., Angellic content, Journal of Philosophical Logic 45(2):199–226, 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Font, J. M., Abstract Algebraic Logic, College Publications, London, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  24. French, R., A Simple Sequent Calculus for Angell’s Logic of Analytic Containment, Studia Logica 105(5):971–994, 2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gödel, K., Über die Parryschen Axiome, Ergebnisse eines mathematischen Kolloquiums, 4:6, 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Humberstone, L., The Connectives, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2011.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  27. Johnson, F., A three-valued interpretation for a relevance logic, Relevance Logic Newsletter 1(3):123–128, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Johnson, F., A natural deduction relevance logic, Bulletin of the Section of Logic 6(4):164–168, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Mares, E., Relevance Logic, in E. Zalta, (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2014 Edition), Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, 2014.

  30. Omori, H., and D. Szmuc, Conjunction and Disjunction in Infectious Logics, in A. Baltag, J. Seligman, and T. Yamada, (eds.), Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Logic, Rationality, and Interaction (LORI 2017), Springer, Berlin, 2017, pp. 268–283.

  31. Paoli, F., Tautological entailments and their rivals, in J.Y. Béziau, W. Carnielli, and D. Gabbay, (eds.), Handbook of Paraconsistency, College Publications, London, 2007, pp. 153–175.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Paoli, F., and M. Pra Baldi, Proof Theory of Paraconsistent Weak Kleene Logic, Studia Logica 4(108):779–802, 2020.

  33. Paoli, F., and M. Pra Baldi, Extensions of Paraconsistent Weak Kleene Logic, Logic Journal of the IGPL, forthcoming.

  34. Parry, W. T., Implication, Ph.D. thesis, Harvard University, 1932.

  35. Parry, W. T., Ein axiomensystem für eine neue art von implikation (analytische implikation), Ergebnisse eines mathematischen Kolloquiums 4:5–6, 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Parry, W. T., The Logic of C.I. Lewis, in C. I. Lewis, and P. A. Schilpp, (eds.), The Philosophy of C. I. Lewis, Open Court, La Salle, Ill., 1968, pp. 115–154.

  37. Parry, W. T., Comparison of entailment theories, Relevance Logic Newsletter 1(1):16–26, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Parry, W. T., Entailment: analytic implication vs. the entailment of Anderson and Belnap, Relevance Logic Newsletter 1(1):11–15, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Parry, W. T., Analytic implication: its history, justification, and varieties, in J. Norman, and R. Sylvan, (eds.), Directions in Relevant Logic, Springer, Netherlands, 1989, pp. 101–118.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  40. Priest, G., Plurivalent Logics, Australasian Journal of Logic 11(1):1–13, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Rescher, N., Many-Valued Logic, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Ripley, D., Paradoxes and failures of cut, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 91(1):139–164, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Smiley, T., Analytic implication and 3-valued logic, Journal of Symbolic Logic 27:378, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Szmuc, D., Defining LFIs and LFUs in extensions of infectious logics, Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 26(4):286–314, 2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Szmuc, D., An Epistemic Interpretation of Paraconsistent Weak Kleene Logic, Logic and Logical Philosophy 28(2):277–330, 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Szmuc, D., and H. Omori, A Note on Goddard and Routley’s Significance Logic, Australasian Journal of Logic 15(2):431–448, 2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Takeuti, G., Proof Theory, 2nd edition, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1987.

  48. Urquhart, A., Basic many-valued logic, in D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner, (eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Volume 2, 2nd edition, Springer, Berlin, 2001, pp. 249–295.

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank two anonymous referees for their valuable input, as well as Eduardo Barrio, Bruno Da Ré, Thomas Ferguson, Rohan French, Federico Pailos, Lucas Rosenblatt, and the members of the Buenos Aires Logic Group for their comments and suggestions. I am especially thankful to Francesco Paoli for discussing with me many important technical issues that were essential for writing this article. This work was carried out while enjoying a doctoral and later a postdoctoral scholarship from CONICET (The National Scientific and Technical Research Council of Argentina).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. IIF (CONICET-SADAF), Bulnes 642, C1176ABL, Buenos Aires, Argentina

    Damian E. Szmuc

Authors
  1. Damian E. Szmuc
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Damian E. Szmuc.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Presented by Heinrich Wansing

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Szmuc, D.E. A Simple Logical Matrix and Sequent Calculus for Parry’s Logic of Analytic Implication. Stud Logica 109, 791–828 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-020-09926-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-020-09926-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation