[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Log in

The modified repeat rate described within a thermodynamic framework

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Derek J. de Solla Price viewed science as a complex system and anticipated that the science of science can be developed via an analogy to thermodynamics. The main point of this article is to show a direct equivalence between a thermodynamic framework and the classical theory of evenness. It illustrates how thermodynamically inspired terms can lead to the measures used to quantify diversity (or lack thereof), balance, evenness, consistency, or concentration. A real-world example based on intersectional inequalities in science is used as an illustration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allison, P. (1978). Measures of inequality. American Sociological Review, 43(6), 865–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egghe, L., & Rousseau, R. (1990). Elements of concentration theory. In L. Egghe & R. Rousseau (Eds.), Informetrics 89/90 (pp. 97–137). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozlowski, D., Larivière, V., Sugimoto, C. R., & Monroe-White, T. (2022). Intersectional inequalities in science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2113067119

  • Lorenz, M. O. (1905). Methods of measuring the concentration of wealth. Publications of the American Statistical Association, 9(70), 209–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nijssen, D., Rousseau, R., & Van Hecke, P. (1998). The Lorenz curve: A graphical representation of evenness. Coenoses, 13(1), 33–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prathap, G. (2011a). A thermodynamic explanation for the Glänzel-Schubert model for the h-index. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(5), 992–994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prathap, G. (2011b). The energy-exergy-entropy (or EEE) sequences in bibliometric assessment. Scientometrics, 87(3), 515–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prathap, G. (2014). Quantity, quality, and consistency as bibliometric indicators. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(1), 214–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price, D. J. (1963). Little science, big science. Columbia University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ramesh, S. (n.d.) What are two lists of integers having the same sum, same sum of squares, and same sum of cubes? https://www.quora.com/What-are-two-lists-of-integers-having-the-same-sum-same-sum-of-squares-and-same-sum-of-cubes

  • Rousseau, R. (2001). Concentration and evenness measures as macro-level scientometric indicators (in Chinese). In: Research and university evaluation (Keyan pingjia yu daxue pingjia), Jiang Guo-hua (ed.), 2001 (pp.72–89). Red Flag Publishing House, Beijing. An English version is available from the author.

  • Rousseau, R. (2018). The repeat rate: From Hirschman to Stirling. Scientometrics, 116(1), 645–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, R., Egghe, L., & Guns, R. (2018). Becoming metric-wise. A bibliometric guide for researchers. Kidlington (Chandos-Elsevier).

  • Rousseau, R., Zhang, L., & Sivertsen, G. (2023). Using the weighted Lorenz curve to represent balance in collaborations: The BIC indicator. Scientometrics, 128(1), 609–622. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04533-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The authors declare that they contributed equally to each aspect of this article.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ronald Rousseau.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript. RR is a member of the Distinguished Reviewer Board of Scientometrics.

Appendix

Appendix

Construction of different distributions with the same modified repeat rate

There exists an interesting way of constructing multisets with the same modified repeat rate. We illustrate this in the case of four numbers (N = 4). The method explained here is due to Sridhar Ramesh (no date available).

Consider a three-dimensional cube with vertices a, b, c, and d on the upper facet and e, f, g, and h on the lower facet. Vertices are named counterclockwise and vertex e is situated below vertex a (see Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Cube used to perform Ramesh’s algorithm

In this theory vertices a, c, f, and h are called the white vertices, while vertices b, d, e, and g are called the black vertices. A cube has six facets, here bounded by a,b,c,d; a,b,f,e; b,c,g,f; c,d,h,b; a,d,h,e and finally by e,f,g, and h. Now assign to each facet a non-negative number and finally, assign to each vertex the sum of the numbers of the three facets adjacent to it. This number is called a V-number. The multiset of the four V-numbers of the white vertices has the same sum and the same sum of squares as the multiset of the four V-numbers of the black vertices, and hence they have the same modified repeat rate. A simple example is given in Table 2.

Table 2 An example of Ramesh’s algorithm

The multisets {12,11,11,8} and {13,10,10,9} have the same sum, namely 42, and the same sum of squares, namely 450. Proof of this property can be given based on symmetry properties of the assigned numbers, but we provide a very elementary proof by just doing the calculations for an abstract assignment of numbers to facets, as shown in the third column of Table 2a and of 2b.

We see that the sum of the white V-numbers is: (u + v + y) + (u + w + x) + (v + w + z) + (x + y + z) = 2(u + v + w + x + y + z ), which is equal to the sum of the black numbers: (u + v + w) + (u + x + y) + (v + y + z) + (w + x + z). Similarly, one can easily check that (u + v + y)2 + (u + w + x)2 + (v + w + z)2 + (x + y + z)2 = (u + v + w)2 + (u + x + y)2 + (v + y + z)2 + (w + x + z)2.

The previous construction deals with the case N = 4. Performing this construction two, three, or more times yields the cases N = 8, 12, etc. (take the union of the obtained multisets). Taking two sets with 4 numbers and appending the same number to both yields an example with N = 5; appending two or three numbers to both multisets (the same numbers) yields examples for the cases N = 6 and N = 7. The construction performed on a cube and also be done on a square yielding the case N = 2, such as {3,7} and {5,5}.

As, for N = 4, the sum of the white V-numbers is equal to the sum of the black V-numbers, and is twice the sum of the freely chosen numbers u,v,w,x,y,z one can form as many couples of multisets with the same modified repeat rate as there are numbers with the same sum. This reasoning also applies to other values of N.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Prathap, G., Rousseau, R. The modified repeat rate described within a thermodynamic framework. Scientometrics 128, 3185–3195 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04698-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04698-2

Keywords

Navigation