Abstract
This paper analyses the open access (OA) production of Spanish public universities from 2011 to 2020 to achieve the following objectives: (i) to identify and analyse policies, strategies and mandates for the promotion of open access; (ii) to analyse practices related to open access of scientific publications, (iii) to explore methodologies that allow identifying variables related to open access of publications. The procedure followed consists of three phases: first, the Spanish regulation on open access is analysed; second, bibliometric techniques are applied to obtain a series of indicators related to open access of publications indexed in the web of science core collection; third, a statistical analysis based on a classification tree of variables is proposed. The results obtained show that the institutional measures and actions to promote OA identified in the policies and mandates of the universities correspond to the bibliometric data. Spanish public universities have higher rates of OA publications, with a clear preference for Green Published and DOAJ Gold publications. OA publications are systematically more cited than non-OA publications (with Green Accepted in the lead), and there is a strong relationship between visibility, funding and open access. It has also been observed that the variables that best predict whether the percentage of OA publications of a university is above average are: the proportion of publications in DOAJ Gold, the impact received by Hybrid publications and the percentage of documents in the Bronze way.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Melibea provides data on the effective implementation of the OA regulations for 17 out of 31 universities. These are the universities represented in Fig. 1.
References
Abadal, E., OlléCastellà, C., Abad-García, F., & Melero, R. (2013). Políticas de acceso abierto a la ciencia en las universidades españolas. Revista Española De Documentación Científica, 36(2), e007. https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2013.2.933
Acceso Abierto (2018) Melibea. Retrieved from https://www.accesoabierto.net/politicas/
Archambault, E., Amyot, D., Deschamps, P., Nicol, A., Rebout, L., Roberge, G. (2013). Proportion of open access peer-reviewed papers at the european and world levels: 2004–2011. Sciencemetrix. Retrieved from https://www.science-metrix.com/pdf/SM_EC_OA_Availability_2004-2011.pdf
Beall, J. (2012). Predatory publishers are corrupting open access. Nature, 489(7415), 179–179.
Björk, B.-C., Welling, P., Laakso, M., Majlender, P., Hedlund, T., & Guðnason, G. (2010). Open access to the scientific journal literature: Situation 2009. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011273
Borrego, A. (2015). Measuring compliance with a spanish government open access mandate. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(4), 757–764. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23422
Borrego, A. (2017). Institutional repositories versus researchgate: The depositing habits of Spanish researchers. Learned Publishing, 30(3), 185–192. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1099
Bosman, J., & Kramer, B. (2018). Open access levels: A quantitative exploration using web of science and OA DOI data. PeerJ Preprints, 6, e3520v1. https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.3520v1
Casani, F., De Filippo, D., García-Zorita, C., & Sanz-Casado, E. (2013). Public versus private universities: Assessment of research performance; case study of the Spanish university system. Research Evaluation, 23(1), 48–61. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvt028
Conferencia de Rectores de las Universidades Españolas. (2019). Compromisos de las Universidades ante la open science. CRUE.
Conferencia de Rectores de las Universidades Españolas, Red de Biblioteca Universitarias Españolas (2018). Recomendaciones sobre la monitorización del Acceso Abierto. CRUE, Madrid. Retrieved from https://rebiun.xercode.es/xmlui/bitstream/handle/20.500.11967/245/Informe_REBIUN_A1_20190116.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Conferencia de Rectores de las Universidades Españolas, Red de Biblioteca Universitarias Españolas (2020). Guía para la Evaluación de los Procesos de Preservación en Repositorios Institucionales de Investigación. CRUE, Madrid. Retrieved from http://rebiun.xercode.es/xmlui/bitstream/handle/20.500.11967/634/Guia_Preservacion_REBIUN_final.pdf?sequence=4&isAllowed=y
Conferencia de Rectores de las Universidades Españolas, Red de Biblioteca Universitarias Españolas (2021). Medición del acceso abierto en las universidades españolas y el CSIC (2016–2020). CRUE, Madrid. Retrieved from https://rebiun.xercode.es/xmlui/handle/20.500.11967/858
De-Castro, P., & Franck, G. (2019). Funding APCs from the research funder’s seat: Findings from the EC FP7 post-grant open access pilot. El Profesional De La Información. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2019.jul.13
De la Torre, E., Sandoval-Hamon, L.A., Galindo, R., Casani, F. (2021). Análisis los estándares, regulaciones, políticas y estrategias (tanto nacionales como internacionales) sobre ciencia abierta en la educación superior—Entregable 1. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4882885
De Filippo, D., & D’Onofrio, M. G. (2019). Alcances y limitaciones de la ciencia abierta en Latinoamérica: análisis de las políticas públicas y publicaciones científicas de la región. Hipertext.net, 19, 32–48. https://doi.org/10.31009/hipertext.net.2019.i19.03
De Filippo, D., & Mañana-Rodríguez, J. (2020). Open access initiatives in European universities: Analysis of their implementation and the visibility of publications in the YERUN network. Scientometrics, 125, 2667–2694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03705-0
De Filippo, D., & Mañana-Rodríguez, J. (2021). Open access policies and mandates and their practical implementation in Spanish public universities. In W. Glänzel, S. Heeffer, P. S. Chi, & R. Rousseau (Eds.), Proceeding of 18th international conference on scientometrics & informetrics. International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics.
EUR-Lex. (2012). Commission recommendation of 17 July 2012 on access to and preservation of scientific information (2012/417/EU). Official Journal of the European Union, 194, 39–43.
Elbaek, MK. (2014). Danish open access barometer: Mapping open access to Danish research and creation of an online prototype for automated open access monitoring. Sciecom Info 10(1). Retrieved from https://journals.lub.lu.se/sciecominfo/article/view/10238
España. Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad, Secretaría de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación (2017). Plan Estatal de investigación científica y técnica y de innovación 2017–2020. Retrieved from https://www.ciencia.gob.es/gesdamdoc-servlet/?uuid=4df69bec-c113-4e22-ae45-37ba72d53b7c&workspace=dam&formato=pdf
European Commission. (2016). Ex-post evaluation of the seventh framework programme. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/info/publications/ex-post-evaluation-seventh-framework-programme-european-community-research-technological-development-and-demonstration-activities-2007-2013-and-rsb-opinion_en
Fathli, M., Lunden, T., Sjogårde P. (2011). The share of open access in Sweden 2011: Analyzing the OA outcome from Swedish universities. Sciecom Info. Retrieved from http://kth.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:788979/FULLTEXT01.pdf
Finland (2014). The Ministry of Education and Culture’s Open Science and Research Initiative 2014–2017. The open science and research roadmap. Reports of the Ministry of Education and Culture, Finland. Retrieved from http://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/75210/okm21.pdf
Forsström, P. L., & Haataja, J. (2016). Open sciences as an instrument for effective research. Signum, 2, 11–15.
Fressoli, M., & De Filippo, D. (2021). Nuevos escenarios y desafíos para la ciencia abierta. Entre el optimismo y la incertidumbre. Arbor, 197(799), a586. https://doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2021.799001
Fundación Española para la Ciencia y la Tecnología. (2014). Recomendaciones para la implementación del artículo 37 difusión en Acceso Abierto de la ley de la ciencia, la tecnología y la innovación. Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad.
Fundación Española para la Ciencia y la Tecnologia (2016). Informe de la comision de seguimiento sobre el grado de cumplimiento del artículo 37 de la Ley de la Ciencia. Retrieved from https://www.fecyt.es/es/publicacion/informe-de-la-comision-de-seguimiento-sobre-el-grado-de-cumplimiento-del-articulo-37-de
Fundación Española de Ciencia y Tecnología. (2017). Hacia un acceso abierto por defecto. Recomendaciones. Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad.
Fundación Española de Ciencia y Tecnología. (2018). Recomendaciones para la implementación del artículo 37 difusión en Acceso Abierto de la ley de la ciencia, la tecnología y la innovación. Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad.
Gargouri, Y., Hajjem, C., Larivière, V., Gingras, Y., Carr, L., Brody, T., & Harnad, S. (2010). Self-selected or mandated, open access increases citation impact for higher quality research. PLoS ONE, 5(10), e13636. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013636
Gargouri, Y., Lariviere, V., Gingras, Y., Carr, L., Harnad, S. (2012). Green and gold open access percentages and growth, by discipline. In: Conference presented at the 17th international conference on science and technology indicators (STI). Retrieved from https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/340294/
Gobierno de España, Ministerio de Universidades (2021). Datos y cifras del sistema universitario español. Publicación 2020–2021. Retrieved from https://www.universidades.gob.es/stfls/universidades/Estadisticas/ficheros/Datos_y_Cifras_2020-21.pdf
Grau Vidal, F. (2012). La Universidad pública Española. Retos y prioridades en el marco de la crisis del primer decenio del siglo XXI. Universidad Rovira Virgili Ediciones.
Gumpenberger, C., Ovalle-Perandones, M. A., & Gorraiz, J. (2013). On the impact of gold open access journals. Scientometrics, 96(1), 221–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0902-7
Harnad, S., Brody, T. (2004). Comparing the impact of open access (OA) versus non-OA articles in the same journals. D-Lib Magazine, 10(6). Retrieved from https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/260207/
IUNE (2021) Observatorio para el seguimiento de la actividad científica de las universidades españolas. Glosario. Abreviaturas de universidades. Retrieved from http://www.iune.es/
Jubb, M., Cook, J., Hulls, D., Jones, D., & Ware, M. (2011). Costs, risks and benefits in improving access to journal articles. Learned Publishing, 24(4), 247–260. https://doi.org/10.1087/20110402
Kurtz, M., & Brody, T. (2006). The impact loss to authors and research. In N. Jacobs (Ed.), Open access: Key strategic, technical and economic aspects. Chandos Publishing.
Laakso, M., Lindman, J., Schen, C., Nyman, L., & Bjork, B. C. (2017). Research output availability on academic social networks: Implications for stakeholders in academic publishing. Electron Markets. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-016-0242-1
Larivière, V., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2018). Do authors comply with mandates for open access? Nature, 562(7728), 483–486. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-07101-w
Melero, R., Melero-Fuentes, D., & Rodríguez-Gairín, J. M. (2018). Monitoring compliance with governmental and institutional open access policies across Spanish universities. El Profesional De La Información, 27(4), 1699–2407.
Moed, H. F. (2007). The effect of “open access” on citation impact: An analysis of ArXiv’s condensed matter section. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(13), 2047–2054. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20663
Netherlands. Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture and Science (2017). National plan open science. Retrieved from https://www.government.nl/ministries/ministry-of-education-culture-and-science
OECD. (2015). Making open science a reality. OECD Science, technology and industry policy papers, 25. OECD Publications.
Observatori de l'accés obert (2019). Retrieved from https://bibliotecnica.upc.edu/observatori?lang=es#presentacio
Perianes, A., & Olmeda, C. (2019). Efects of journal choice on the visibility of scientific publications: A comparison between subscription-based and full open access models. Scientometrics, 121, 1737–1752. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03966-3
Piwowar, H., Priem, J., Larivière, V., Alperin, J. P., Matthias, L., Norlander, B., Farley, A., West, J., & Haustein, S. (2018). The state of OA: A largescale analysis of the prevalence and impact of open access articles. PeerJ. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4375
Portugal. Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Ensino Superior (2016). Ciência Aberta, Conhecimento para todos: Princípios orientadores. Retrieved from https://www.fosteropenscience.eu/content/ciencia-aberta-conhecimento-para-todos
Quaderi, N., Hardcastle, J., Petrou, C., & Szomszor, M. (2019). The plan S footprint: Implications for the scholarly publishing landscape. Institute for Scientific Information (ISI).
Rovira, A., Urbano, C., & Abadal, E. (2019). Open access availability of Catalonia research output: Case analisis of the CERCA institution. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216597
Science-Metrix. (2018). Analytical support for bibliometrics indicators: Open access availability of scientific publications. Science-Metrix.
Suber, P. (2003). Removing the barriers to research: An introduction to open access for librarians. College and Research Libraries News, 64, 92.
Suber, P. (2005). Open access, impact, and demand: Why some authors self archive their articles. BMJ, 330(7500), 1097.
Suber, P. (2012). Open access. MIT Press.
Torres-Salinas, D., Robinson-Garcia, N., & Moed, H. F. (2019). Disentangling gold open access. Springer handbook of science and technology indicators (pp. 129–144). Springer.
Van Noorden, R. (2014). Funders punish open-access dodgers. Nature, 508, 161. https://doi.org/10.1038/508161a
Zhang, L., & Watson, E. M. (2017). Measuring the impact of gold and green open access. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 43(4), 337–345.
Zuccala, A. (2009). The lay person and open access. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 43(1), 1–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.2009.1440430115
Acknowledgements
The results were found under "The role of Open Science in the Spanish University: Institutional transformation and anticipatory governance" (ROSSUE, PID2019-104052RB-C21) a project financed by the Spanish State Research Agency under the National RDI Plan’s RETOS call. This study was carried out with funds provided, also, by the Ramon y Cajal call (RYC2018-024894-I) from the Spanish Ministry of Science, Research and Universities. A preliminary version of this study has been presented at the ISSI 2021 conference, entitled "Open access policies and mandates and their practical implementation in Spanish public universities" (De Filippo & Mañana-Rodriguez, 2021).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
De Filippo, D., Mañana-Rodriguez, J. The practical implementation of open access policies and mandates in Spanish public universities. Scientometrics 127, 7147–7167 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04261-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04261-x