Abstract
We show that the greater the scientific wealth of a nation, the more likely that it will tend to concentrate this excellence in a few premier institutions. That is, great wealth implies great inequality of distribution. The “scientific wealth” is interpreted in terms of citation data harvested by Google Scholar Citations for profiled institutions from all countries in the world.
References
Cimini, G., Gabrielli, A., & Sylos Labini, F. (2014). The scientific competitiveness of nations. PLoS ONE, 9(12), e113470. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0113470.
Cole, S., & Phelan, T. J. (1999). The scientific productivity of nations. Minerva, 37, 1–23.
King, D. A. (2004). The scientific impact of nations. Nature, 430, 311–316. doi:10.1038/430311a.
Klavans, R., & Boyack, K. W. (2017). The research focus of nations: Economic versus Altruistic Motivations. PLoS ONE, 12(1), e0169383. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0169383.
Leydesdorff, L., & Zhou, P. (2005). Are the contributions of China and Korea upsetting the world system of science? Scientometrics, 63(3), 617–630.
May, R. M. (1997). The scientific wealth of nations. Science, 275, 793–796.
Prathap, G. (2011). The energy–exergy–entropy (or EEE) sequences in bibliometric assessment. Scientometrics, 87, 515–524.
Prathap, G. (2014). Quantity, quality, and consistency as bibliometric indicators. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 65(1), 214.
Sarwar, R., & Hassan, S. (2015). A bibliometric assessment of scientific productivity and international collaboration of the Islamic World in science and technology (S and T) areas. Scientometrics, 105(2), 1059–1077.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Prathap, G. Scientific wealth and inequality within nations. Scientometrics 113, 923–928 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2511-y
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2511-y