Comparing scientific performance among equals

• Alonso, S., Cabrerizo, F. J., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2009). h-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields. Journal of Informetrics, 3(4), 273–289.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bornmann, L., Mutz, R., & Daniel, H. D. (2008). Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the h index?A comparison of nine different variants of the h index using data from biomedicine. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59, 830–837.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Coleman, B. J., Bolumole, Y. A., & Frankel, R. (2012). Benchmarking individual publication productivity in logistics. Transportation Journal, 51(2), 164–196.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• El Emam, K., Arbuckle, L., Jonker, E., & Anderson, K. (2012). Two h-index benchmarks for evaluating the publication performance of medical informatics researchers. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 14(5). doi: 10.2196/jmir.2177.

• Geoffrion, A. M., Dyer, J. S., & Feinberg, A. (1972). An interactive approach for multi-criterion optimization, with an application to the operation of an academic department. Management Science, 19, 357–368.

  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Glänzel, W. (2006). On the Opportunities and Limitations of the H-index. Science Focus, 1(1), 10–11.

  Google Scholar 

• Harzing, A. (2010). The publish or perish book. Melbourne, Australia: Tarma Software Research.

• Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 16569–16580.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Iglesias, J. E., & Pecharromán, C. (2007). Scaling the h-index for different scientific ISI fields. Scientometrics, 73(3), 303–320.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Imperial, J., & Rodríguez-Navarro, A. (2007). Usefulness of Hirsch’s h-index to evaluate scientific research in Spain. Scientometrics, 71(2), 271–282.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Köksalan, M. M., & Sagala, P. N. S. (1995). Interactive approaches for discrete alternative multiple criteria decision making with monotone utility functions. Management Science, 41, 1158–1171.

  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Lehmann, S., Jackson, A. D., & Lautrup, B. E. (2008). A quantitative analysis of indicators of scientific performance. Scientometrics, 76, 369–390.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lundberg, J. (2007). Lifting the crown-citation z-score. Journal of Informetrics, 1, 145–154.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Moed, H. F., Debrun R. E., & Vanlleuwen T. (1995). New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance-database description, overview of indicators and first applications. Scientometrics, 33, 381–422.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Moed, H. F. (2009). New developments in the use of citation analysis in research evaluation. Archivum immunologiae et therapiae experimentalis, 57(1), 13–18.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Panaretos, J., & Malesios, C. (2009). Assessing scientific research performance and impact with single indices. Scientometrics, 81(3), 635–670.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Podlubny, I. (2005). Comparison of scientific impact expressed by the number of citations in different fields of science. Scientometrics, 64(1), 95–99.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Radicchi, F., Fortunato, S., & Castellano, C. (2008). Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 45, 17268–17272.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Saaty, T. (1988). What is the Analytic hierarchy process? Mathematical models for Decision Support, 48, 109–121.

  Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Schulze, M. (2003). A new monotonic and clone-independent single winner election method. Voting Matters, 17, 9–19.

  Google Scholar 

• Tideman, T. N. (1987). Independence of clones as a criterion for voting rules. Social Choice and Welfare, 4, 185–206.

  Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references