A three-dimensional bibliometric evaluation of research in polymer solar cells

• Bornmann, L., Mutz, R., Hug, S. E., & Daniel, H. D. (2011). A meta-analysis of studies reporting correlations between the h index and 37 different h index variants. Journal of Informetrics, 5(3), 346–359.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Egghe, L. (2006a). How to improve the h-index. The Scientist, 20(3), 14.

  Google Scholar 

• Egghe, L. (2006b). An improvement of the h-index: The g-index. ISSI Newsletter, 2(1), 8–9.

  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Egghe, L. (2006c). Theory and practice of the g-index. Scientometrics, 69(1), 131–152.

  Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Egghe, L. (2010). The Hirsch index and related impact measures. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 44(1), 65–114.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Garfield, E. (1955). Citation indexes to science: A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science, 122(3159), 108–111.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Garfield, E. (1999). Journal impact factor: A brief review. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 161(8), 979–980.

  Google Scholar 

• Garfield, E. (2005). The agony and the ecstasy: The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. In International congress on peer review and biomedical publication. http://garfield.library.upenn.edu/papers/jifchicago2005.pdf.

• Glänzel, W. (2013). High-end performance or outlier? Evaluating the tail of scientometric distribution. Scientometrics, 97(1), 13–23.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(46), 16569–16572.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Katz, J. S. (2005). Scale-independent bibliometric indicators. Measurement, 3(1), 24–28.

  Google Scholar 

• Laney, D. (2011). 3D data management: Controlling data volume, velocity and variety. http://blogs.gartner.com/doug-laney/files/2012/01/ad949-3D-Data-Management-Controlling-Data-Volume-Velocity-and-Variety.pdf.

• Leydesdorff, L., & Bornmann, L. (2011). Integrated impact indicators (I3) compared with impact factors (IFs): An alternative design with policy implications. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (in press).

• Pendlebury, D. A., & Adams, J. (2012). Comments on a critique of the Thomson Reuters journal impact factor. Scientometrics, 92(2), 395–401.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Prathap, G. (2011a). The energy–exergy–entropy (or EEE) sequences in bibliometric assessment. Scientometrics, 87, 515–524.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Prathap, G. (2011b). Quasity, when quantity has a quality all of its own—toward a theory of performance. Scientometrics, 88, 555–562.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Prathap, G. (2013a). Quantity, quality, and consistency as bibliometric indicators. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,. doi:10.1002/asi.23008.

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Prathap, G. (2013b). The zynergy-index and the formula for the h-index. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,. doi:10.1002/asi.23046.

  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references