[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Log in

Second order indicators for evaluating international scientific collaboration

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We propose an indicator to “measure” the extent to which co-publication through international collaboration enhances the value of scientific output of an organisation or agency performing academic research. A second order approach is used which combines a quality proxy (impact) and a quantity or size proxy (number of papers published) to yield a trinity of energy like scalar proxies. From these it is possible to define an index of foreign collaboration and another evenness indicator that shows the size and unevenness of the role foreign collaboration plays in the total academic output of the organization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Basu, A., & Aggarwal, R. (2001). International collaboration in science in India and its impact on institutional performance. Scientometrics, 52(3), 379–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. (2006). CiteSpace II: detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(3), 359–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E. (1955). Citation indexes to science: a new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science, 122(3159), 108–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E. (1999). Journal impact factor: a brief review. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 161(8), 979–980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E. (2005). The agony and the ecstasy: the history and meaning of the journal impact factor. International Congress on Peer Review and Biomedical Publication. http://garfield.library.upenn.edu/papers/jifchicago2005.pdf.

  • Leydesdorff, L., & Bornmann, L. (2011). Integrated impact indicators (I3) compared with impact factors (IFs): an alternative design with policy implications. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (in press).

  • Nishy, P., Panwar, Y., Prasad, S., Mandal, G. K., & Prathap, G. (2012). An impact-citations-exergy (iCX) trajectory analysis of leading research institutions in India. Scientometrics, 91(1), 245–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pendlebury, D. A., & Adams, J. (2012). Comments on a critique of the Thomson Reuters journal impact factor. Scientometrics,. doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0689-6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prathap, G. (2011a). A comment to the papers by Opthof and Leydesdorff, Scientometrics, 88, 1011–1016, 2011 and Waltman et al., Scientometrics, 88, 1017–1022, 2011. Scientometrics, 90(2), 737–743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prathap, G. (2011b). The Energy–Exergy–Entropy (or EEE) sequences in bibliometric assessment. Scientometrics, 87(3), 515–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prathap, G. (2011c). Energy indicators and percentile ranking normalization. Scientometrics, 91(3), 997–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanclay, J. K. (2012). Impact factor: outdated artefact or stepping-stone to journal certification? Scientometrics,. doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0561-0.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gangan Prathap.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Prathap, G. Second order indicators for evaluating international scientific collaboration. Scientometrics 95, 563–570 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0804-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0804-8

Keywords

Navigation