On first quartile journals which are not of highest impact

• Abonyi, J., Balasko, B., & Feil B. (2011). Fuzzy clustering and data analysis toolbox. Department of Process Engineering at the University of Veszprem, Hungary. http://www.fmt.vein.hu/softcomp/fclusttoolbox. Accessed June 2011.

• Adam, D. (2002). The counting house. Nature, 415, 726–729.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bergstrom, C. (2007). Eigenfactor: Measuring the value and prestige of scholarly journals. College and Research Libraries News, 68(5), 314–316.

  Google Scholar 

• Bezdek, J. C., & Dunn, J. C. (1975). Optimal fuzzy partitions: A heuristic for estimating the parameters in a mixture of normal distributions. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 24(8), 835–838.

  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Bollen, J., Rodriguez, M. A., & van de Sompel, H. (2006). Automatic metadata generation using associative networks. Scientometrics, 69(3), 669–687.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Burrough, P. A., & McDonnell, R. A. (1998). Principles of geographical information systems. Principles of geographical information systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Butler, L. (2004). What happens when funding is linked to publication counts?. In H. F. Moed (Ed.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research (pp. 389–405). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

  Google Scholar 

• Comisión Nacional Evaluadora de la Actividad Investigadora (CNEAI). (2011). http://www.educacion.gob.es/horizontales/ministerio/organismos/cneai.htm. Accessed June 2011.

• Duda, R. O., Hart, P. E., & Stork, D. G. (2001). Pattern classification (2nd Ed., p. 680). New York: Wiley.

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Dunn, J. C. (1973). A fuzzy relative of the isodata process and its use in detecting compact well separated clusters. Journal of Cybernetics, 28, 32–57.

  Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Fisher, P., & Wood, J. (1998) What is a Mountain? Or the Englishman who went up a Boolean geographical concept but realised it was fuzzy. Geography, 83, 247–256.

  Google Scholar 

• Garfield, E. (2006). The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. JAMA—Journal of the American Medical Association, 295(1), 90–93.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Gath, I., & Geva, A. B. (1989). Unsupervised optimal fuzzy clustering. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 11, 773–781.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• González-Pereira, B., Guerrero-Bote, V. P., & Moya-Anegón, F. (2010). A new approach to the metric of journals’ scientific prestige: The SJR indicator. Journal of Informetrics, 4(3), 379–391.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. PNAS, 102(46), 16569–16572. doi:10.1073/pnas.0507655102.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Jiménez-Contreras, E., Moya-Anegón, F., & López-Cózar, E. (2003). The evolution of research activity in Spain: The impact of the National Commission for the Evaluation of Research Activity (CNEAI). Research Policy, 32, 123–142.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Journal Citation Reports. (2011). Thomson Reuters. http://thomsonreuters.com/products_services/science/science_products/a-z/journal_citation_reports. Accessed June 2011.

• Kalaitzidakis, P., Thanasis, S., & Mamuneas, T. P. (2003). Rankings of academic journals and institutions in economics. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(6), 1346–1366.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kodrzycki, Y. K., & Yu, P. (2006). New approaches to ranking economics journals. Contributions to Economic Analysis and Policy, 5(1), article 24.

  Google Scholar 

• Leydesdorff, L., Moya-Anegón, F., & Guerrero-Bote, V. P. (2010). Journal maps on the basis of Scopus data: A comparison with the Journal Citation Reports of the ISI. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61, 352–369.

  Google Scholar 

• Liebowitz Stanley, J., & Palmer, J. P. (1984). Assessing the relative impacts of economics journals. Journal of Economic Literature, 1, 77–88.

  Google Scholar 

• Ma, N., Guan, J., & Zhao, Y. (2008). Bringing PageRank to the citation analysis. Information Processing and Management, 44(2), 800–810.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• McBratney, A. B., de Gruijter, J. J., & Brus, D. J. (1992). Spatial prediction and mapping of continuous soil classes. Geoderma, 54, 39–64.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• McBratney, A. B., & Odeh, I. O. A. (1997). Application of fuzzy sets in soil science: Fuzzy logic, fuzzy measurements and fuzzy decisions. Geoderma, 77, 85–114.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• OECD. (2010). In Performance-based funding for public research in tertiary education institutions: Workshop proceedings. OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264094611-en.

• Palacios-Huerta, I,, & Volij, O. (2004). The measurement of intellectual influence. Econometrica, 72(3), 963–977.

  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Pinski, G., & Francis, N. (1976). Citation influence for journal aggregates of scientific publications. Information Processing and Management, 12, 297–312.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Rousseau, S., Verbeke, T., & Rousseau, R. (2009). Evaluating environmental and resource economics journals: A TOP-curve approach. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 3(2), 270–287.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• SCImago Journal and Country Rank. (2011). SCImago Research Group. http://www.scimagojr.com. Accessed June 2011.

• van Raan Anton, F. J. (2004). Measuring science. In F. Moed Henk, G. Wolfgang, & S. Ulrich (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research (pp. 19–50). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

  Google Scholar 

Download references