Abstract
To determine whether variations in stereotype content salience moderates stereotype threat effects, 66 US female undergraduate students were given a standardized math exam, and the salience of specific gender–math stereotype content was manipulated before the exam. Women exerted more effort on each problem and performed better on a math exam when threatened with an effort-based stereotype compared to when threatened with the ability-based stereotype or control (where no stereotype was explicitly mentioned). Implications of these results are discussed in terms of stereotype and social identity threat theory, as well as how the socio-cultural salience of ability versus other components of the gender–math stereotype may impact women who pursue math and science-based domains.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aronson, J., Fried, C., & Good, C. (2002). Reducing the effects of stereotype threat on African American college students by shaping theories of intelligence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 113–125.
Aronson, J., Lustina, M. J., Good, C., Keough, K., Steele, C. M., & Brown, J. (1999). When White men can’t do math: Necessary and sufficient factors in stereotype threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 29–46.
Chen, C., & Stevenson, H. W. (1995). Motivation and mathematics achievement: A comparative study of Asian-American, Caucasian-American, and East Asian high school students. Child Development, 66, 1215–1234.
Crocker, J., Major, B., & Steele, C. (1998). Social stigma. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 504–533, 4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Davies, P. G., Spencer, S. J., & Steele, C. M. (2005). Clearing the air: Identity safety moderates the effects of stereotypes threat on women’s leadership aspirations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 276–287.
Deaux, K., & LaFrance, M. (1998). Gender. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 504–533, 4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256–273.
Eccles, J. S. (1994). Understanding women’s educational and occupational choices. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 585–609.
Eccles, J., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132.
Educational Testing Service (1995). Practicing to take the general test: Big book. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Fazio, R. H., Zanna, M. P., & Cooper, J. (1977). Dissonance and self perception: An integrated view of each theory’s proper domain of application. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 464–479.
Good, C., Aronson, J., & Inzlicht, M. (2003). Improving adolescents’ standardized test performance: An intervention to reduce the effects of stereotype threat. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 24, 645–662.
Good, C., Dweck, C. S., & Rattan, A. (2005). Perceiving a malleable-ability versus a fixed-ability environment: The effect of women’s sense of belonging to math. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology. New Orleans, LA, January.
Hess, R. D., & Azuma, H. (1991). Cultural support for schooling: Contrasts between Japan and the United States. Educational Researcher, 20, 2–8.
Inzlicht, M., & Good, C. (2006). How environments can threaten academic performance, self-knowledge, and sense of belonging. In S. Levin & C. van Laar (Eds.), Stigma and group inequality: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 129–150). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Kurtz-Costez, B., McCall, R. J., Kinlaw, C. R., Wiesen, C. A., & Joyner, H. (2005). What does it mean to be smart? The development about children’s beliefs about intelligence in Germany and the United States. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 26, 217–233.
Murphy, M., Steele, C. M., & Gross, J. J. (2007). Signaling threat: How situational cues affect women in math, science, and engineering settings. Psychological Science, 18, 879–885.
National Science Foundation (1996). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 1996 (National Science Foundation Publication No. 96–311). Arlington, VA: Author.
Sansone, C., & Thoman, D. B. (2005). Interest as the missing motivator in self-regulation. European Psychologist, 10, 175–186.
Seymour, E., & Hewitt, N. M. (1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Sloan, L. R., Wilburn, G., Fenton, T., Craig-Henderson, K., & Starr, B. J. (2004). Out-group presence, but not overt negative stereotype reminders, produce stereotype threat performance decrements in in-group settings. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago, IL, April.
Smith, J. L. (2004). Understanding the process of stereotype threat: A review of meditational variables and new performance goal directions. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 177–206.
Smith, J. L., & White, P. H. (2001). Development of the domain identification measure: A tool for investigating stereotype threat effects. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61, 1040–1057.
Smith, J. L., & White, P. H. (2002). An examination of implicitly activated, explicitly activated, and nullified stereotypes on mathematical performance: It’s not just a woman’s issue. Sex Roles, 47, 179–191.
Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M., & Quinn, D. M. (1999). Stereotype threat and women’s math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 4–28.
Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52, 613–629.
Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African-Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797–811.
Steele, C. M., Spencer, S. J., & Aronson, J. (2002). Contending with group image: The psychology of stereotype threat and social identity threat. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 379–440.
Swim, J. K., & Stangor, C. (1998). Prejudice: The target’s perspective. San Diego, CA: Academic.
Acknowledgments
Portions of this research were funded by a National Science Foundation Fellowship for the first author to participate in the East Asia Summer Institute Program. We also thank Carol Sansone for her helpful comments on a previous version of this manuscript, as well as two very helpful anonymous reviewers for their comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Thoman, D.B., White, P.H., Yamawaki, N. et al. Variations of Gender–math Stereotype Content Affect Women’s Vulnerability to Stereotype Threat. Sex Roles 58, 702–712 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9390-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9390-x