[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Development of Lidocaine-Coated Microneedle Product for Rapid, Safe, and Prolonged Local Analgesic Action

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

ABSTRACT

Purpose

To demonstrate rapid (~1 min) lidocaine delivery using 3M’s solid microstructured transdermal system (sMTS) for prolonged, local analgesic action.

Methods

Polymeric microneedles were fabricated via injection molding and then dip-coated using an aqueous lidocaine formulation. The amount of lidocaine coated onto the microneedles was determined by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). To assess drug delivery and dermal pharmacokinetics, lidocaine-coated microneedles were inserted into domestic swine. Skin punch biopsies were collected and analyzed to determine lidocaine concentration in skin using HPLC-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). Commercial lidocaine/prilocaine EMLA (Eutectic Mixture of Local Anesthetic) cream was used as comparative control.

Results

Lidocaine dissolves rapidly off the microneedles and into skin such that the 1-min wear time achieves or exceeds lidocaine tissue levels needed to cause analgesia. This therapeutic threshold (100 ng/mg) was estimated by measuring the total amount of lidocaine and prilocaine in skin following a 1 h EMLA application. When co-formulated with 0.03 wt% vasoconstrictor-epinephrine, the concentration of lidocaine in tissue was maintained above 100 ng/mg for approximately 90 min.

Conclusions

3M’s sMTS can be used to provide rapid delivery of lidocaine for local analgesia up to 90 min.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Guy RH. Current status and future prospects of transdermal drug delivery. Pharm Res. 1996;13:1765–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hallen B, Olsson GL, Uppfeldt A. Pain-free venepuncture. Effect of timing of application of local anaesthetic cream. Anaesthesia. 1984;39:969–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Teillol-Foo WLM, Kassab JY. Topical glyceryl trinitrate and eutectic mixture of local anaesthetics in children. A randomised controlled trial on choice of site and ease of venous cannulation. Anaesthesia. 1991;46:881–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Milewski M, Brogden NK, Stinchcomb AL. Current aspects of formulation efforts and pore lifetime related to microneedle treatment of skin. Expert Opin Drug Del. 2010;7:617–29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Prausnitz MR, Langer R. Transdermal drug delivery. Nat Biotechnol. 2008;26:1261–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Coulman SA, Anstey A, Gateley C, Morrissey A, McLoughlin P, Allender C, et al. Microneedle mediated delivery of nanoparticles into human skin. Int J Pharm. 2009;366:190–200.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Peterson TA. Microstructured transdermal systems for intradermal vaccine and drug delivery. Pharm Tech Eur. 2006;18:21–6.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hansen K, Haldin B. A Solid Microstructured Transdermal System (sMTS) for systemic delivery of salts & proteins. Drug Deliv Tech. 2008;8:38–42.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cormier M, Johnson B, Ameri M, Nyam K, Libiran L, Zhang DD, et al. Transdermal delivery of desmopressin using a coated microneedle array patch system. J Control Release. 2004;97:503–11.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kreilgaard M. Dermal pharmacokinetics of microemulsion formulations determined by in vivo microdialysis. Pharm Res. 2001;18:367–73.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kreilgaard M, Pedersen EJ, Jaroszewski JW. NMR characterisation and transdermal drug delivery potential of microemulsion systems. J Control Release. 2000;69:421–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Li X, Zhao R, Qin Z, Zhang J, Zhai S, Qiu Y, et al. Microneedle pretreatment improves efficacy of cutaneous topical anesthesia. Am J Emerg Med. 2010;28:130–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Singh P, Roberts MS. Dermal and underlying tissue pharmacokinetics of lidocaine after topical application. J Pharm Sci. 1994;83:774–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rosenberg PH. Additives to increase tissue spread of local anesthetics. Tech Reg Anesth Pain Manag. 2004;8:114–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lewis-Smith PA. Adjunctive use of hyaluronidase in local anaesthesia. Br J Plast Surg. 1986;39:554–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Moorthy SS, Dierdorf SF, Yaw PB. Influence of volume on the spread of local anesthetic-methylene blue solution after injection for intercostal block. Anesth Analg. 1992;75:389–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Singh P, Roberts MS. Effects of vasoconstriction on dermal pharmacokinetics and local tissue distribution of compounds. J Pharm Sci. 1994;83:783–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bernards CM, Kopacz DJ. Effect of epinephrine on lidocaine clearance in vivo: a microdialysis study in humans. Anesthesiology. 1999;91:962–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Scott DB, Jebson PJR, Braid DP, Örtengren B, Frisch P. Factors affecting plasma levels of lignocaine and prilocaine. Br J Anaesth. 1972;44:1040–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Yamazaki T, Mamiya H, Ichinohe T, Kaneko Y. Distribution of lidocaine in alveolar tissues in rabbits. J Hard Tissue Biol. 2009;18:95–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Friedman PM, Mafong EA, Friedman ES, Geronemus RG. Topical anesthetics update: EMLA and beyond. Dermatol Surg. 2001;27:1019–26.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mehra P, Caiazzo A, Maloney P. Lidocaine toxicity. Anesth Prog. 1998;45:38–41.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS & DISCLOSURES

We would like to thank JoAnn Oesterich, Mary Hopp, Chris Webb and Tonya Grunwald for their assistance with the animal studies. The authors would also like to thank Daniel Duan, Jerry Gysbers, Peter Johnson and David Brandwein for valuable technical discussion. The authors thank Ryan Simmers and Ron Krienke for supplying microneedles.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 3M Drug Delivery Systems Division, St. Paul, Minnesota, 55144, USA

    Ying Zhang, Ken Brown, Kris Siebenaler, Amy Determan, Daniel Dohmeier & Kris Hansen

Authors
  1. Ying Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ken Brown
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kris Siebenaler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Amy Determan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Daniel Dohmeier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Kris Hansen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kris Hansen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, Y., Brown, K., Siebenaler, K. et al. Development of Lidocaine-Coated Microneedle Product for Rapid, Safe, and Prolonged Local Analgesic Action. Pharm Res 29, 170–177 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-011-0524-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-011-0524-4

KEY WORDS

Search

Navigation