Krylov projection methods for linear Hamiltonian systems

1. Van der Schaft, A., Jeltsema, D.: Port-Hamiltonian systems theory: an introductory overview. Foundations and Trends in Systems and Control 1(2–3), 173 (2014)

   Article  Google Scholar 

2. Feng, K., Qin, M.Z.: .. In: Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations, pp. 1–37. Springer (1987)

3. McLachlan, R.: Symplectic integration of Hamiltonian wave equations. Numer. Math. 66(1), 465 (1993)

   Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

4. Marsden, J.E., Weinstein, A.: The Hamiltonian structure of the Maxwell-Vlasov equations. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 4(3), 394 (1982)

   Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

5. Sun, Y., Tse, P.: Symplectic and multisymplectic methods for Maxwell’s equations. J. Comput. Phys. 230(5), 2076 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2010.12.006

   Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

6. Taylor Michael, E.: Partial Differential Equations, I. Basic Theory, vol. 115. Springer, New York (2011)

   Book  Google Scholar 

7. Richtmyer, R.D., Morton, K.W.: Difference methods for initial-value problems. Interscience Publishers John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Academia Publishing House of the Czechoslovak Acad (1967)

8. LaBudde, R.A., Greenspan, D.: Energy and momentum conserving methods of arbitrary order for the numerical integration of equations of motion. Numer. Math. 25(4), 323 (1975)

   Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

9. McLachlan, R.I., Quispel, G., Robidoux, N.: Geometric integration using discrete gradients. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 357(1754), 1021 (1999)

   Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

10. Brugnano, L., Iavernaro, F., Trigiante, D.: Hamiltonian boundary value methods (energy preserving discrete line integral methods). Journal of Numerical Analysis Industrial Applied Mathematics 5(1), 17 (2010)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

11. Celledoni, E., Grimm, V., McLachlan, R.I., McLaren, D., Owren, B., O’neale, D., Quispel, G.: Preserving energy resp. dissipation in numerical PDEs using the “Average Vector Field” method. J. Comput. Phys. 231(20), 6770 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

12. Ge, Z., Marsden, J.: Lie-Poisson Hamilton-Jacobi theory and Lie-Poisson integrators. Phys. Lett. A 133, 134 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

13. Botchev, M.A., Verwer, J.G.: Numerical integration of damped Maxwell equations. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 31(2), 1322 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

14. Eirola, T., Koskela, A.: Krylov integrators for Hamiltonian systems. BIT Numer. Math. 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10543-018-0732-y (2018)

15. Lopez, L., Simoncini, V.: Preserving geometric properties of the exponential matrix by block Krylov subspace methods. BIT Numer. Math. 46(4), 813 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

16. Archid, A., Bentbib, A.H.: Approximation of the matrix exponential operator by a structure-preserving block Arnoldi-type method. Appl. Numer. Math. 75, 37 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnum.2012.11.008

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

17. Benner, P., Mehrmann, V., Xu, H.: A numerically stable structure-preserving method for computing the eigenvalues of real Hamiltonian or symplectic pencils. Numer. Math. 78(3), 329 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

18. Arnol’d, V.I., Dubrovin, B., Kirillov, A., Krichever, I.: Dynamical Systems IV: Symplectic Geometry and Its Applications, vol. 4. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin (2001)

    Book  Google Scholar 

19. Hairer, E., Lubich, C., Wanner, G.: Geometric Numerical Integration: Structurepreserving Algorithms for Ordinary Differential Equations, vol. 31. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin (2006)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

20. Arnoldi, W.E.: The principle of minimized iterations in the solution of the matrix eigenvalue problem. Q. Appl. Math. 9(1), 17 (1951)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

21. Benner, P., Faßbender, H., Stoll, M.: A Hamiltonian Krylov–Schur-type method based on the symplectic Lanczos process. Linear Algebra Appl. 435(3), 578 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

22. Lall, S., Krysl, P., Marsden, J.E.: Structure-preserving model reduction for mechanical systems. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 184(1), 304 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

23. Celledoni, E., Li, L.: .. In: Proceedings of the ECMI Conference, pp. 663–559 (2016)

24. Benner, P., Faßbender, H.: An implicitly restarted symplectic Lanczos method for the Hamiltonian eigenvalue problem. Linear Algebra Appl. 263, 75 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

25. Watkins, D.S.: On Hamiltonian and symplectic Lanczos processes. Linear Algebra Appl. 385, 23 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

26. Faßbender, H.: A detailed derivation of the parameterized SR algorithm and the symplectic Lanczos method for Hamiltonian matrices. Preprint (2006)

27. Agoujil, S., Bentbib, A., Kanber, A.: A structure preserving approximation method for hamiltonian exponential matrices. Appl. Numer. Math. 62(9), 1126 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

28. Goldstein, H., Poole, C., Safko, J.: Classical Mechanics, 3rd edn. Addison Wesley (2001)

29. Benner, P., Mehrmann, V., Sorensen, D.C.: Dimension Reduction of Large-Scale Systems, vol. 35. Springer, Berlin (2005)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

30. Ward, R.C.: Numerical computation of the matrix exponential with accuracy estimate. SIAM J. Num. Anal. 14, 600 (1977)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references