[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Improved Particle Swarm Optimization on Based Quantum Behaved Framework for Big Data Optimization

  • Published:
Neural Processing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent times, big data has become an essential concern with the rapid increase of digitalization. The problems that find solutions to the problems of finding and evaluating the features of big data are called optimization problems. In this paper, data sets containing EEG signals have been studied. The goal is to detect actual EEG signals while eliminating additional brain activity patterns in the collected data, resulting in more accurate interpretation. In the study, to handle big data optimization (BigOpt) difficulties, a novel swarm intelligence-based technique is developed. A Developed PSO-Q was proposed by updating the random walking phase of the Particle Swarm Optimization on the combined quantum behaved method (PSO-Q) for BigOpt problems. PSO-Q's local search capability has been improved. The success of PSO-Q and IPSO-Q has been thoroughly tested in various cycles (maximum iterations) (300, 400, 500, and 1000) and population sizes (10, 25, and 50) on six data sets. The outcomes of the PSO-Q and IPSO-Q were statistically evaluated with the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test. PSO-Q and IPSO-Q have been compared with newly developed swarm-based algorithms (BA, Jaya, AOA, etc.) in the literature in recent years. The success of IPSO-Q has been shown by evaluating the results obtained. The results showed that IPSO-Q can be used as an alternative algorithm in BigOpt problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Rajabioun R (2011) Cuckoo optimization algorithm. Appl Soft Comput 11(8):5508–5518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2011.05.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Akay B, Karaboga D (2012) Artificial bee colony algorithm for large-scale problems and engineering design optimization. J Intell Manuf 23:1001–1014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-010-0393-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kumar V, Kumar D (2021) A systematic review on firefly algorithm: past, present, and future. Arch Comput Methods Eng 28:3269–3291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-020-09498-y

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Dorigo M, Birattari M, Stutzle T (2006) Ant colony optimization. IEEE Comput Intell Mag 1(4):28–39. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCI.2006.329691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kennedy J, Eberhart R (1995) Particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on neural networks, Perth, WA, pp 1942–1948

  6. El-Zonkoly AM (2006) Optimal tuning of power systems stabilizers and AVR gains using particle swarm optimization. Expert Syst Appl 31(3):551–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lin Y-L, Chang W-D, Hsieh J-G (2008) A particle swarm optimization approach to nonlinear rational filter modeling. Expert Syst Appl 34(2):1194–1199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tsou C-S (2008) Multi-objective inventory planning using MOPSO and TOPSIS. Expert Syst Appl 35(1):136–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sun J, Feng B, Xu WB (2004) Particle swarm optimization with particles having quantum behavior. In: Proceedings of the congress on evolutionary computation (CEC ’04), pp 325–331

  10. Moore P, Venayagamoorthy GK (2005) Evolving combinational logic circuits using a hybrid quantum evolution and particle swarm inspired algorithm. In: Proceeding of the NASA/DoD conference on evolvable hardware (EH '05), pp 97–102

  11. Mikki SM, Kishk AA (2006) Quantum particle swarm optimization for electromagnetics. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag 54(10):2764–2775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yumin D, Li Z (2014) Quantum behaved particle swarm optimization algorithm based on artificial fish swarm. Math Probl Eng. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/592682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Santos Coelho L, Guerra FA, Pasquim B, Cocco Mariani V (2013) Chaotic quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization approach applied to inverse heat transfer problem. In: Proceedings of the 5th ınternational joint conference on computational ıntelligence (IJCCI ’13), pp 97–102

  14. Liu FQ, Zhang HW (2013) Dynamic clustering based on quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization. Adv Mater Res 798:808–813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Li H, Li S (2012) Quantum particle swarm evolutionary algorithm with application to system identification. In: Proceedings of the ınternational conference on measurement, ınformation and control (MIC ’12), vol 2, pp 1032–1036

  16. Chang WL, Grady N (2019) NIST big data interoperability framework, vol 1, ver 3, Definitions, pp 4–12. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.1500-1r2

  17. El Majdouli MA, Rbouh I, Bougrine S, El Benani B, El Imrani AA (2016) Fireworks algorithm framework for Big Data optimization. Memet Comput 8:333–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12293-016-0201-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. El Majdouli MA, Bougrine S, Rbouh I, El Imrani AA (2016b) A fireworks algorithm for single-objective big optimization of signals. In: 2016 IEEE/ACS 13th ınternational conference of computer systems and applications (AICCSA), pp 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/AICCSA.2016.7945745

  19. Han J, Haihong E, Le G, Du J (2011) Survey on NoSQL database. In: 2011 6th international conference on pervasive computing and applications (ICPCA). IEEE, pp 363–366. http://www.husseinabbass.net/BigOpt.html. Accessed 31 Oct 2021

  20. Rao R (2016) Jaya: a simple and new optimization algorithm for solving constrained and unconstrained optimization problems. Int J Ind Eng Comput 7(1):19–34

    Google Scholar 

  21. Abualigah L, Diabat A, Mirjalili S, Elaziz MA, Gandomi AH (2021) The arithmetic optimization algorithm. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 376(2021):113609

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Yang X-S (2011) Bat algorithm for multi-objective optimization. Int J Bio-Inspired Comput 3:267. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIC.2011.042259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Aslan S (2020) A comparative study between artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm and its variants on big data optimization. Memet Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12293-020-00298-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Aslan S, Karaboga D (2020) A genetic Artificial Bee Colony algorithm for signal reconstruction based big data optimization. Appl Soft Comput 88:106053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2019.106053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Elaziz MA, Li L, Jayasena KPN, Xiong S (2020) Multiobjective big data optimization based on a hybrid salp swarm algorithm and differential evolution. Appl Math Model 80:929–943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2019.10.069

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang H, Wang W, Cui L, Sun H, Zhao J, Wang Y, Xue Y (2018) A hybrid multi-objective firefly algorithm for big data optimization. Appl Soft Comput 69:806–815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2017.06.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Yi JH, Deb S, Dong J, Alavi AH, Wang G-G (2018) An improved NSGA-III algorithm with adaptive mutation operator for Big Data optimization problems. Futur Gener Comput Syst 88:571–585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2018.06.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang Y, Liu J, Zhou M, Jiang Z (2016) A multi-objective memetic algorithm based on decomposition for big optimization problems. Memet Comput 8(1):45–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12293-015-0175-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang K, Yang Z, Zhang K, Chatzimisios P, Yang K, Xiang W (2016) Big data-driven optimization for mobile networks toward 5G. IEEE Netw 30(1):44–51. https://doi.org/10.1109/MNET.2016.7389830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sabar NR, Abawajy J, Yearwood J (2017) Heterogeneous cooperative co-evolution memetic differential evolution algorithm for big data optimization problems. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 21(2):315–327. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEVC.2016.2602860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Elsayed S, Sarker R (2016) Differential evolution framework for big data optimization. Memet Comput 8:17–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12293-015-0174-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Cao Z, Wang L, Hei X, Jiang Q, Lu X, Wang X (2016) A phase-based optimization algorithm for big optimization problems. In: 2016 IEEE congress on evolutionary computation (CEC). IEEE, pp 5209–5214

  33. Zhang Y, Zhou M, Jiang Z, Liu J (2015) A multi-agent genetic algorithm for big optimization problems. In: 2015 IEEE congress on evolutionary computation (CEC), pp 703–707. https://doi.org/10.1109/CEC.2015.7256959

  34. Loukdache A, Majdouli MAE, Bougrine S, Imrani AAE (2018) A clonal selection algorithm for the electroencephalography signals reconstruction. In: Proceedings of 2017 ınternational conference on electrical and ınformation technologies, ICEIT 2017, pp 1–6

  35. Meselhi MA, Elsayed SM, Essam DL, Sarker RA (2017) Fast differential evolution for big optimization. In: 2017 11th ınternational conference on software, knowledge, ınformation management and applications (SKIMA), pp 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/SKIMA.2017.8294137

  36. Abdi Y, Feizi-Derakhshi M-R (2020) Hybrid multi-objective evolutionary algorithm based on Search Manager framework for big data optimization problems. Appl Soft Comput 87:105991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Peng Z, Liao J, Cai Y (2015) Differential evolution with distributed direction information based mutation operators: an optimization technique for big data. J Ambient Intell Human Comput 6:481–494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-015-0259-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Grover LK (1996) A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search. In Proceedings of 28th annual ACM symposium on the theory of computing. ACM Press, Philadelphia, pp 212–221

  39. Shor PW (1994) Algorithms for quantum computation: discrete logarithms and factoring. In: Proceedings of the 35th annual symposium on foundations of computer science. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, pp 20–22

  40. Zhisheng Z (2010) Quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization algorithm for economic load dispatch of power system. Expert Syst Appl 37:1800–1803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Abbass HA (2014) Calibrating independent component analysis with Laplacian reference for real-time EEG artifact removal. In: International conference on neural information processing. Springer, pp 68–75

  42. Goh SK, Abbass HA, Tan KC, Al Mamun A (2014) Artifact removal from EEG using a multi-objective independent component analysis model. In: International conference on neural information processing. Springer, pp 570–577

  43. Goh SK, Tan KC, Al-Mamun A, Abbass HA (2015) Evolutionary big optimization (BigOpt) of signals. In: 2015 IEEE congress on evolutionary computation (CEC). IEEE, pp 3332–3339

  44. Elsayed S, Sarker R (2015) An adaptive configuration of differential evolution algorithms for big data. In: IEEE congress on evolutionary computation (CEC). IEEE, pp 695–702

  45. Xinchao Z (2010) A perturbed particle swarm algorithm for numerical optimization. Appl Soft Comput 10(1):119–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Omidvar MN, Li X, Mei Y, Yao X (2014) Cooperative coevolution with differential grouping for large-scale optimization. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 18(3):378–393. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEVC.2013.2281543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Zhang J, Sanderson AC (2009) Jade: adaptive differential evolution with the optional external archive. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 13(5):945–958. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEVC.2009.2014613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Tanabe R, Fukunaga A (2013) Evaluating the performance of shade on CEC 2013 benchmark problems. In: 2013 IEEE congress on evolutionary computation. IEEE, pp 1952–1959

  49. Price KV, Awad NH, Ali MZ, Suganthan PN (2018) The 100-digit challenge: problem definitions and evaluation criteria for the 100-digit challenge special session and competition on single objective numerical optimization. School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Technical report

  50. Abdullah JM, Rashid AT (2019) Fitness dependent optimizer: inspired by the bee swarming reproductive process. IEEE Access 7:43473–43486. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2907012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Mirjalili S (2015) Dragonfly algorithm: a new meta-heuristic optimization technique for solving single-objective, discrete, and multi-objective problems. Neural Comput Appl 27(4):1053–1073

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  52. Mirjalili S, Lewis A (2016) The whale optimization algorithm. Adv Eng Softw 95:51–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Mirjalili S, Gandomibf AH, Mirjalili SZ, Saremia C, Faris H, Mirjalilie SM (2017) Salp swarm algorithm: a bio-inspired optimizer for engineering design problems. Adv Eng Softw 114:163–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Kaya M (2018) HADOOP KULLANARAK METEOROLOJİ VERİLERİNDEN BİR İKLİM DEĞİŞİMİ EĞİLİM ANALİZİ, SÜLEYMAN DEMİREL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Isparta (Yüksek Lisans tezi)

  55. White T (2009) Hadoop: the definitive guide. O’Reilly Media Inc, Sebastopol

    Google Scholar 

  56. Patel AB, Birla M, Nair U (2012) Addressing big data problem using hadoop and map reduce. In: 2012 Nirma Universıty internatıonal conference on engineerıng, NUiCONE-2012, 06–08 December

Download references

Funding

This work was not funded by any institution.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Kulu Vocational School, Selçuk University, 42075, Konya, Turkey

    Emine Baş

Authors
  1. Emine Baş
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emine Baş.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There was no conflict of interest among the authors in this study.

Human and Animal Rights

This article does not include any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors. This article does not include any animal studies by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baş, E. Improved Particle Swarm Optimization on Based Quantum Behaved Framework for Big Data Optimization. Neural Process Lett 55, 2551–2586 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-022-10850-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-022-10850-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation