[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Susceptibility analysis of large-scale debris flows based on combination weighting and extension methods

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Susceptibility is an important issue in debris flow analysis. In this paper, 26 large-scale debris flow catchments located in the Wudongde Dam site were investigated. Seven major factors, namely, loose material volume per square kilometer, loose material supply length ratio, average gradient of the main channel, average hill slope, drainage density, curvature of the main channel, and poor vegetation area ratio, were selected for debris flow susceptibility analysis. Geographic information system, global positioning system, and remote sensing, collectively known as 3S technologies, were used to determine major factors. Weights of major factors affecting debris flow susceptibility were determined. This paper applied the combination weighting method, which considers both the preference of the engineers for major factors and the objective major factor information by using analytic hierarchy process and entropy method. Combination weights of major factors for the investigated 26 debris flow catchments are 0.20, 0.12, 0.20, 0.10, 0.08, 0.19, and 0.11, respectively. Combination weights follow the order of loose material volume per square kilometer = average gradient of the main channel > curvature of the main channel > loose material supply length ratio > poor vegetation area ratio > average hill slope > drainage density. This paper applied extension theory, which is used to solve incompatibility and contradiction problems, to determine susceptibility. Susceptibility results show that the susceptibility of 4 debris flow catchments are very low, 13 are low, 8 are moderate, and 1 is high. Assessment results exhibit consistency with the activity analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akgun A, Dag S, Bulut F (2008) Landslide susceptibility mapping for a landslide-prone area (Findikli, NE of Turkey) by likelihood-frequency ratio and weighted linear combination models. Environ Geol 54:1127–1143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bisson M, Favalli M, Fornaciai A, Mazzarini F, Isola I, Zanchetta G, Pareschi MT (2005) A rapid method to assess fire-related debris flow hazard in the Mediterranean region: an example from Sicily (southern Italy). Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 7:217–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollschweiler M, Stoffel M (2010) Tree rings and debris flows: recent developments, future directions. Prog Phys Geogr 34:625–645

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton A, Bathurst JC (1998) Physically based modeling of shallow landslide sediment yield at a catchment scale. Environ Geol 35:89–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai W (1983) The extension set and incompatibility problem. J Sci Explor 1:81–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrara A, Crosta G, Frattini P (2008) Comparing models of debris-flow susceptibility in the alpine environment. Geomorphology 94:353–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catani F, Casagli N, Ermini L, Righini G, Menduni G (2005) Landslide hazard and risk mapping at catchment scale in the Arno River basin. Landslides 2:329–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang TC (2007) Risk degree of debris flow applying neural networks. Nat Hazards 42:209–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang TC, Chao RJ (2006) Application of back-propagation networks in debris flow prediction. Eng Geol 85:270–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang TC, Chien YH (2007) The application of genetic algorithm in debris flows prediction. Environ Geol 53:339–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen LC, Teng WH, Hsu MH, Lai MJ (2000) Practical aspects on applying the inundation potential map for Taiwan. J Taiwan Water Conserv 48:13–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen CC, Tseng CY, Dong JJ (2007) New entropy-based method for variables selection and its application to the debris-flow hazard assessment. Eng Geol 94:19–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen YY, Li CZ, Wang SB, Fu JL, Zhang ZS, Jiang FC (2009) Grain-size characteristics and origin of Longjie silt layer in the Yuanmou area, Yunnan, China. Geol Bull China 28:578–584

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen YR, Yeh CH, Yu B (2011) Integrated application of the analytic hierarchy process and the geographic information system for flood risk assessment and flood plain management in Taiwan. Nat Hazards 59:1261–1276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conway SJ, Decaulne A, Balme MR, Murray JB, Towner MC (2010) A new approach to estimating hazard posed by debris flows in the Westfjords of Iceland. Geomorphology 114:556–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crosta GB, Frattini P (2003) Distributed modeling of shallow landslides triggered by intense rainfall. Nat Hazard Environ Syst Sci 3:81–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Amato Avanzi G, Giannecchini R, Puccinelli A (2004) The influence of the geological and geomorphological settings on shallow landslides. An example in a temperate climate environment: the June 19, 1996 event in north western Tuscany (Italy). Eng Geol 73:215–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong JJ, Lee CT, Tung YH, Liu CN, Lin KP, Lee JF (2009) The role of the sediment budget in understanding debris flow susceptibility. Earth Surf Process Landform 34:1612–1624

    Google Scholar 

  • Duke JM, Aull-Hyde R (2002) Identifying public preferences for land preservation using the analytic hierarchy process. Ecol Econ 42:131–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duo TH, Wang YL, Huang ZH (2011) A fuzzy math evaluation on debris-flow occurrence in the three main gullies in Chayuangou valley. J Geol Hazard Environ Preserv 22:31–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellen SD, Fleming RW (1987) Mobilization of debris flows from soil slips, San Francisco Bay Region, California. In: Costa JE, Wieczorek GF (Eds) Debris flows/avalanches: process, recognition, and mitigation. Reviews in engineering geology, vol. 7. Geological Society of America, Boulder, pp 31–40

  • Feng QG, Zhou CB, Fu ZF, Zhang GC (2010) Grey fuzzy variable decision-making model of supporting schemes for foundation pit. Rock Soil Mech 30:2226–2231

    Google Scholar 

  • Giannecchini R, Naldini D, D’Amato Avanzi D, Puccinelli A (2007) Modelling of the initiation of rainfall-induced debris flows in the Cardoso basin (Apuan Alps, Italy). Quat Int 171–172:108–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glade T (2005) Linking debris-flow hazard assessments with geomorphology. Geomorphology 66:189–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grissino-Mayer HD (2003) A manual and tutorial for the proper use of an increment borer. Tree-Ring Res 59:63–79

  • He YP, Xie H, Cui P, Wei FQ, Zhong DL, Gardner JS (2003) GIS-based hazard mapping and zonation of debris flows in Xiaojiang Basin, southwestern China. Environ Geol 45:286–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hürlimann M, Rickenmann D, Graf C (2003) Field and monitoring data of debris-flow events in the Swiss Alps. Can Geotech J 40:161–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakob M, Hungr O (2005) Debris-flow hazards and related phenomena. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Jun Y (2009) Application of extension theory in misfire fault diagnosis of gasoline engines. Expert Syst Appl 36:1217–1221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuang LH, Xu LR, Liu BC (2006) Debris flow hazard assessment based on extension method. China Railw Sci 27:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Lan HX, Zhou CH, Wang LJ, Zhang HY, Li RH (2004) Landslide hazard spatial analysis and prediction using GI in the Xiaojiang watershed, Yunnan, China. Eng Geol 76:109–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Pradhan B (2007) Landslide hazard mapping at Selangor, Malaysia using frequency ratio and logistic regression models. Landslides 4:33–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang GM, Yao LK (2008) Study on determining the critical rainfall of rainstorm mudflow. Subgrade Eng 6:3–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin PS, Lin JY, Hung JC, Yang MD (2002) Assessing debris-flow hazard in a watershed in Taiwan. Eng Geol 66:295–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu XC, Gu ZX (2010) Hazard assessment of debris flow along highway based on extension AHP. Chin J Geol Hazard Control 21:61–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Guo HC, Zou R, Wang J (2006) Neural network modeling for regional hazard assessment of debris flow in Lake Qionghai Watershed, China. Environ Geol 49:968–976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu CN, Dong JJ, Peng YF, Huang HF (2009) Effects of strong ground motion on the susceptibility of gully type debris flows. Eng Geol 104:241–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu GY, Chiu LS, Wong DW (2007) Vulnerability assessment of rainfall-induced debris flows in Taiwan. Nat Hazards 43:223–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Min LR, Yin ZG, Zhang JQ (1990) The formation time and paleoenvironment of the Longjie silt bed. Quat Sci 4:354–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery DR, Dietrich WE (1994) A physically based model for the topographic control on shallow landsliding. Water Resour Res 30:83–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Ni HY, Zheng WM, Li ZL, Ba RJ (2010) Recent catastrophic debris flows in Luding county, SW China: geological hazards, rainfall analysis and dynamic characteristics. Nat Hazards 55:523–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohlmacher GC, Davis JC (2003) Using multiple logistic regression and GIS technology to predict landslide hazard in northeast Kansas, USA. Eng Geol 69:331–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranjan KD, Shuichi H, Atsuko N, Minoru Y, Takuro M, Katsuhiro N (2004) GIS-based weights-of-evidence modeling of rainfall-induced landslides in small catchments for landslide susceptibility mapping. Environ Geol 54:311–324

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1977) A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. J Math Psychol 15:234–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw Hill Inc, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Scally FA, Owens IF, Louis J (2010) Controls on fan depositional processes in the schist ranges of the Southern Alps, New Zealand, and implications for debris-flow hazard assessment. Geomorphology 122:99–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen CW, Lo WC, Chen CY (2012) Evaluating susceptibility of debris flow hazard using multivariate statistical analysis in Hualien County. Disaster Adv 5:743–755

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoffel M, Beniston M (2006) On the incidence of debris flows from the early Little Ice Age to a future greenhouse climate: A case study from the Swiss Alps. Geophys Res Lett 33:L16404

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoffel M, Bollschweiler M (2009) Tree-ring reconstruction of past debris flows based on a small number of samples-possibilities and limitations. Landslides 6:225–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan WP, Han QY (1992) Indices of debris flow in Sichuan province. J Catastrophol 7:37–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Tie YB, Tang C (2006) Application of AHP in single debris flow risk assessment. Chin J Geol Hazard Control 17:79–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiranti D, Bonetto S, Mandrone G (2008) Quantitative basin characterization to refine debris-flow triggering criteria and processes: an example from the Italian Western Alps. Landslides 5:45–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tseng CY (2006) Entropic criterion for model selection. Phys A 370:530–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tunusluoglu MC, Gokceoglu C, Nefeslioglu HA, Sonmez H (2008) Extraction of potential debris source areas by logistic regression technique: a case study from Barla, Besparmak and Kapi mountains (NW Taurids, Turkey). Environ Geol 54:9–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaganov EA, Hughes MK, Shashkin AV (2006) Growth dynamics of conifer tree rings: images of past and future environments. Springer, Berlin

  • Wan S, Lei TC, Huang PC, Chou TY (2008) The knowledge rules of debris flow event: a case study for investigation Chen Yu Lan River, Taiwan. Eng Geol 98:102–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang MH, Tseng YF, Chen HC, Chao KH (2009) A novel clustering algorithm based on the extension theory and genetic algorithm. Expert Syst Appl 36:8269–8276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welsh A, Davies T (2011) Identification of alluvial fans susceptible to debris-flow hazards. Landslides 8:183–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu W, Sidle RC (1995) A distributed slope stability model for steep forested basins. Water Resour Res 31:2097–2110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Zhou WD (2011) Sparse ensembles using weighted combination methods based on linear programming. Pattern Recogn 44:97–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang C, Chen JP, Wang Q, Zhang W, Que JS (2010) Study of activity intensity of debris flow based on three-dimensional drainage system model and fractal theory. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 29:1214–1221

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang C, Chen JP, Wang Q, Zhang W (2011a) Study on debris flow based on fractal theory and characteristics of water system. Shuili Xuebao 42:351–356

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang W, Li HZ, Chen JP, Zhang C, Xu LM, Sang WF (2011b) Comprehensive hazard assessment and protection of debris flows along Jinsha River close to the Wudongde dam site in China. Nat Hazard 58:459–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou BF, Lee DJ, Luo DF, Lu RR, Yang CS (1991) A guide for debris-flows hazard mitigation. Science Publisher, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundations of China (grant numbers: 40872170, 40902077 and 41042196), Doctoral Program Foundation of Higher Education of China (grant number: 20090061110054), Jilin University’s 985 project (grant number: 450070021107), 2010 non-profit scientific special research funds of Ministry of Water Resources (grant number: 201001008), and Graduate Innovation Fund of Jilin University (grant number: 20121073).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Construction Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun, 130026, China

    Wen Zhang, Jian-ping Chen, Qing Wang, Xin Qian, Liangjun Xiang & Longxiang He

  2. Gansu Province Transportation Planning, Survey & Design Institute Co., LTD, Lanzhou, 730030, Gansu, China

    Yuke An

Authors
  1. Wen Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jian-ping Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Qing Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yuke An
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xin Qian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Liangjun Xiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Longxiang He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jian-ping Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, W., Chen, Jp., Wang, Q. et al. Susceptibility analysis of large-scale debris flows based on combination weighting and extension methods. Nat Hazards 66, 1073–1100 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0539-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0539-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation