[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

An EEG abnormality detection algorithm based on graphic attention network

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The incidence of brain diseases has increased yearly, threatening human life and health seriously. The Electroencephalogram (EEG) has been playing an important role in clinical practice for diagnosing brain diseases. However, due to the interference of noise and the limitations of manual observation, experts need to spend a lot of time and energy on EEG interpretation, and also is affected by subjective factors, which is prone to misjudgment. Therefore, the establishment of EEG-assisted diagnosis system is of great significance for the clinical diagnosis of brain diseases. With the application of artificial intelligence in EEG auxiliary system, researchers have proposed a series of EEG automatic analysis and anomaly detection algorithms based on deep learning. However, the existing algorithms still have some shortcomings such as inadequate extraction of potential spatio-temporal features in EEG signals. In this paper, the method based on GATs-LSTM is proposed. The comparative analysis of the final experiment shows that, It has demonstrated superior performance on the benchmark dataset with sensitive and specificity as 99.21%, 99.73% and 94.15%, 95.67%. The proposed work shows great results on the benchmark datasets and a big potential for clinics as a support system with medical experts monitoring the patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets CHB-MIT analyzed during the current study are available in the physionet repository, https://physionet.org/content/chbmit/1.0.0

The datasets Bonn Epilepsy analyzed during the current study are available in http://qcsdn.com/q/a/3118833.html

The datasets Clinical data set analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to Privacy Policy but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Acharya UR, Chua CK, Lim TC et al (2009) Automatic identification of epileptic EEG signals using nonlinear parameters[J]. J Mech Med Biol 9(04):539–553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Alickovic E, Kevric J, Subasi A (2018) Performance evaluation of empirical mode decomposition, discrete wavelet transform, and wavelet packed decomposition for automated epileptic seizure detection and prediction[J]. Biomed Signal Process Control 39:94–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bengio Y, Simard P, Frasconi P (1994) Learning long-term dependencies with gradient descent is difficult. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 2002:5. https://doi.org/10.1109/72.279181

  4. Bhattacharya A, Baweja T, Karri S (2021) Epileptic seizure prediction using deep transformer model.[J]. Int J Neural Syst, 2150058

  5. Chen X, He J, Wu X et al (2020) Sleep staging by bidirectional long short-term memory convolution neural network[J]. Futur Gener Comput Syst 109:188–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gao Z, Dang W, Wang X et al (2021) Complex networks and deep learning for EEG signal analysis[J]. Cogn Neurodyn 15(3):369–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gong YZ (2020) Analysis of quality of life and its influencing factors in epilepsy patients [D]. Lanzhou University

  8. Hui X (2020) Research on the correlation and complexity of nonlinear time series [D] Beijing Jiaotong University

  9. Jiao Z, Gao X, Wang Y et al (2018) Deep convolutional neural networks for mental load classification based on EEG data[J]. Pattern Recogn 76:582–595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kalatzis I, Piliouras N, Ventouras E, Papageorgiou CC, Rabavilas AD, Cavouras D (2004) Design and implementation of an SVM-based computer classification system for discriminating depressive patients from healthy controls using the p600 component of ERP signals[J]. Comput Methods Prog Biomed 75(1):11–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Knopman DS, Amieva H, Petersen RC et al (2021) Alzheimer disease[J]. Nat Rev Dis Prim 7(1):1–21

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kumar JS, Bhuvaneswari P (2012) Analysis of electroencephalography (EEG) signals and its categorization a study[J]. Procedia Eng 38:2525–2536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kwon S (2019) A CNN-assisted enhanced audio signal processing for speech emotion recognition[J]. Sensors 20(1):183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lodder SS, van Putten MJAM (2013) Quantification of the adult EEG background pattern[J]. Clin Neurophysiol 124(2):228–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lun X, Jia S, Hou Y, et al. (2020) GCNs-net: a graph convolutional neural network approach for decoding time-resolved eeg motor imagery signals[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.08924

  16. Maiorana E (2020) Deep learning for EEG-based biometric recognition[J]. Neurocomputing 410:374–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Milosavljević A (2020) Identification of salt deposits on seismic images using deep learning method for semantic segmentation[J]. ISPRS Int J Geo Inf 9(1):24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. MuMing P (2019) Three development directions of brain science research [J]. Bull Chin Acad Sci 34(07)

  19. Narayanan SJ, Perumal B, Saman S et al (2020) Deep learning for person re-identification in surveillance videos[M]//deep learning: algorithms and applications. Springer, Cham, pp 263–297

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Nsugbe E, Samuel OW, Asogbon MG et al (2021) Phantom motion intent decoding for transhumeral prosthesis control with fused neuromuscular and brain wave signals[J]. IET Cyber-Syst Robot 3(1):77–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Raghu S, Sriraam N, Temel Y et al (2020) EEG based multi-class seizure type classification using convolutional neural network and transfer learning[J]. Neural Netw 124:202–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2020.01.017

  22. Sanei S (2013) EEG signal processing[M]. Springer, Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ali Shoeb JG (2010) Application of machine learning to epileptic seizure detection[C]. International Conference on Machine Learning, DBLP

  24. Shoeibi A, Ghassemi N, Alizadehsani R et al (2021) A comprehensive comparison of handcrafted features and convolutional autoencoders for epileptic seizures detection in EEG signals[J]. Expert Syst Appl 163:113788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Shoka AAE, Alkinani MH, El-Sherbeny AS et al (2021) Automated seizure diagnosis system based on feature extraction and channel selection using EEG signals[J]. Brain Inf 8(1):1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Singh K , Malhotra J (2022) Two-layer LSTM network-based prediction of epileptic seizures using EEG spectral features[J].Complex & Intelligent Systems 8(3):2405–2418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-021-00627-z

  27. Spivak D I (2022) Polynomial functors and Shannon entropy[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.12878

  28. Xu M, Yao J, Zhang Z et al (2020) Learning EEG topographical representation for classification via convolutional neural network[J]. Pattern Recogn 105:107390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yao X, Cheng Q, Zhang GQ (2019) Automated classification of seizures against Nonseizures: A Deep Learning Approach[J]. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1906.02745

  30. Zhang D, Yao L, Chen K et al (2019) Making sense of spatio-temporal preserving representations for EEG-based human intention recognition[J]. IEEE Trans Cybern 50(7):3033–3044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhao X, Liu D, Ma L et al (2022) Deep CNN model based on serial-parallel structure optimization for four-class motor imagery EEG classification[J]. Biomed Signal Process Control 72:103338

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was partially supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China under grant agreements Nos. 61973250, 82150301, 61973249, 62002271, 61902296, 62073218, 62133012, 62273232, 62273231, 62003279, 61936006, and 62073255. The Innovation Capability Support Program of Shaanxi under Grant 2021TD-05. The Key Research and Development Program of Shaanxi under Grant 2020ZDLGY04-07, 2021ZDLGY02-06 and 2021GY-077, Young science and technology nova of Shaanxi Province: 2022KJXX-73, 2023KJXX-136. Qin Chuangyuan project 2021QCYRC4-49, National Defense Science and Technology Key Laboratory Fund Project No. 6142101210202, Qinchuangyuan Scientist + Engineer No. 2022KXJ-169, National Key R & D program of China (No. 2022YFB4300700), Shaanxi Association for Science and Technology Young Talent Lifting Program (No.XXJS202242).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Junwei Duan and Fei Xie contributed equally.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Information Science and Technology, Northwest University, Xi’an, China

    Junwei Duan, Ningyuan Huang & Ziyu Guan

  2. Frontier Cross Research Institute, Xidian University, Xi’an, China

    Fei Xie

  3. Key Laboratory of Human-Machine Integration and Control Technology for Intelligent Rehabilitation, Xijing University, 710123, Xi’an, China

    Fei Xie

  4. Department of Neurology and Institute of Neurology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China

    Ningdi Luo

  5. School of Computer Science and Technology, Xidian University, Xi’an, China

    Wei Zhao

  6. Shanghai Yiran Health Consulting Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China

    Gang Gao

Authors
  1. Junwei Duan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fei Xie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ningyuan Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ningdi Luo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ziyu Guan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Wei Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Gang Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ziyu Guan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Duan, J., Xie, F., Huang, N. et al. An EEG abnormality detection algorithm based on graphic attention network. Multimed Tools Appl 83, 17941–17960 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-16280-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-16280-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation