[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Transmission of correct gaze direction in video conferencing using screen-embedded cameras

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 20 August 2021

This article has been updated

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a new video conferencing system that presents correct gaze directions of a remote user by switching among images obtained from multiple cameras embedded in a screen according to a local user’s position. Our proposed method reproduces a situation like that in which the remote user is in the same space as the local user. The position of the remote user to be displayed on the screen is determined so that the positional relationship between the users is reproduced. The system selects one of the embedded cameras whose viewing direction towards the remote user is the closest to the local user’s viewing direction to the remote user’s image on the screen. As a result of quantitative evaluation, we confirmed that, in comparison with the case using a single camera, the accuracy of gaze estimation was improved by switching among the cameras according to the position of the local user.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

References

  1. Harrison C, Hudson SE (2008) Pseudo-3d video conferencing with a generic webcam. In: 2008 Tenth IEEE International Symposium on Multimedia, pp 236–241

  2. Hecht H, Boyarskaya E, Kitaoka A (2014) The mona lisa effect: Testing the limits of perceptual robustness vis-à-vis slanted images. Psihologija 47(3):287–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Higuchi K, Chen Y, Chou PA, Zhang Z, Liu Z (2015) Immerseboard: Immersive telepresence experience using a digital whiteboard. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (ACM, New York, NY, USA), CHI ’15, pp 2383–2392. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2702123.2702160

  4. Jones A, Lang M, Fyffe G, Yu X, Busch J, McDowall I, Bolas M, Debevec P (2009) Achieving eye contact in a one-to-many 3d video teleconferencing system. In: ACM SIGGRAPH 2009 Papers, pp 64:1–64:8

  5. Jouppi NP, Iyer S, Thomas S, Slayden A (2004) Bireality: Mutually-immersive telepresence. In: Proceedings of the 12th Annual ACM International Conference on Multimedia, (ACM, New York, NY, USA), MULTIMEDIA ’04, pp 860–867. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1027527.1027725

  6. Kim K, Bolton J, Girouard A, Cooperstock J, Vertegaal R (2012) Telehuman: Effects of 3d perspective on gaze and pose estimation with a life-size cylindrical telepresence pod. In: SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp 2531–2540

  7. Kuster C, Popa T, Bazin J-C, Gotsman C, Gross M (2012) Gaze correction for home video conferencing. ACM Trans. Graph., pp 174:1–174:6

  8. Lincoln P, Nashel A, Ilie A, Towles H, Welch G, Fuchs H (2009) Multi-view lenticular display for group teleconferencing. In: International Conference on Immersive Telecommunications, pp 22:1–22:8

  9. Lincoln P, Welch G, Nashel A, State A, Ilie A, Fuchs H (2011) Animatronic shader lamps avatars. Virtual Real., pp 225–238

  10. Maimone A, Fuchs H (2011) Encumbrance-free telepresence system with real-time 3d capture and display using commodity depth cameras. In: IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, pp 137–146

  11. Misawa K, Ishiguro Y, Rekimoto J (2012) Livemask: A telepresence surrogate system with a face-shaped screen for supporting nonverbal communication. In: International Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces, pp 394–397

  12. Nguyen D, Canny J (2005) Multiview: Spatially faithful group video conferencing. In: SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp 799–808

  13. Otsuka K (2016) Mmspace: Kinetically-augmented telepresence for small group-to-group conversations. In: IEEE Virtual Reality, pp 19–28

  14. Pan Y, Steed A (2014) A gaze-preserving situated multiview telepresence system. In: SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp 2173–2176

  15. Pejsa T, Kantor J, Benko H, Ofek E, Wilson A (2016) Room2room: Enabling life-size telepresence in a projected augmented reality environment. In: ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, pp 1716–1725

  16. Sirkin D, Venolia G, Tang J, Robertson G, Kim T, Inkpen K, Sedlins M, Lee B, Sinclair M (2011) Motion and attention in a kinetic videoconferencing proxy. In: IFIP TC 13 International Conference on Human-computer Interaction, pp 162–180

  17. Vertegaal R, Weevers I, Sohn C, Cheung C (2003) Gaze-2: Conveying eye contact in group video conferencing using eye-controlled camera direction. In: SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp 521–528

  18. Yang R, Zhang Z (2004) Eye gaze correction with stereovision for video-teleconferencing. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, pp 956–960

  19. Zhang C, Cai Q, Chou P, Zhang Z, Martin-Brualla R (2013) Viewport: A distributed, immersive teleconferencing system with infrared dot pattern. IEEE MultiMedia, pp 17–27

  20. Zhu J, Yang R, Xiang X (2011) Eye contact in video conference via fusion of time-of-flight depth sensor and stereo. 3D Research 2(3):5

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is partially supported by the Center of Innovation Program from Japan Science and Technology Agency.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Saitama University, Shimo-okubo 255, Sakura-ku, Saitama, Japan

    Kazuki Kobayashi & Takashi Komuro

  2. Shizuoka University, Johoku 3-5-1, Naka-ku, Hamamatsu, Japan

    Keiichiro Kagawa & Shoji Kawahito

Authors
  1. Kazuki Kobayashi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Takashi Komuro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Keiichiro Kagawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shoji Kawahito
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takashi Komuro.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original online version of this article was revised: The affiliation details for Kazuki Kobayashi and Takashi Komuro was incorrect.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kobayashi, K., Komuro, T., Kagawa, K. et al. Transmission of correct gaze direction in video conferencing using screen-embedded cameras. Multimed Tools Appl 80, 31509–31526 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-09758-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-09758-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation