[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Log in

Automated lion optimization algorithm assisted Denoising approach with multiple filters

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The usage of digital images is growing exponentially yet, it suffers from numerous quality degradations. There are so many reasons for image quality degradations such as camera resolution, lighting conditions, environmental conditions and so on. However, the quality of a digital image is mostly affected by ‘noise’, which may occur during image acquisition or transmission. Though there are several denoising approaches in the existing literature, most of the denoising works are meant for treating a single type of noise. This work presents a denoising approach, which considers different noises and are treated with multiple adaptive filters under the assistance of the Lion Optimization Algorithm (LOA). The performance of the proposed denoising approach is tested by varying the noise variance against existing approaches. The proposed approach shows better results in terms of PSNR, FSIM and FoM by consuming minimal time with 2149 ms, when compared to the existing approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chakraborty D, Chakraborty A, Banerjee A, Bhadra Chaudhuri SR (2018) Automated spectral domain approach of quasi-periodic denoising in natural images using notch filtration with exact noise profile. IET Image Process 12(7):1150–1163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang K, Zuo W, Zhang L (2018) FFDNet: toward a fast and flexible solution for CNN-based image Denoising. IEEE Trans Image Process 27(9):4608–4622

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Panigrahi SK, Gupta S, Sahu PK (2018) Curvelet-based multiscale denoising using non-local means & guided image filter. IET Image Process 12(6):909–918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Diwakar M, Kumar M (2018) CT image denoising using NLM and correlation-based wavelet packet thresholding. IET Image Process 12(5):708–715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang X, Chen W, Gao J, Wang C (2018) Hybrid image denoising method based on non-subsampled contourlet transform and bandelet transform. IET Image Process 12(5):778–784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cheng W, Hirakawa K (2018) Towards optimal Denoising of image contrast. IEEE Trans Image Process 27(7):3446–3458

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Huang Z, Zhang Y, Li Q, Zhang T, Sang N, Hong H (2018) Progressive dual-domain filter for enhancing and Denoising optical remote-sensing images. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett 15(5):759–763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang F, Cai N, Wu J, Cen G, Wang H, Chen X (2018) Image denoising method based on a deep convolution neural network. IET Image Process 12(4):485–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. He W, Zhang H, Shen H, Zhang L (2018) Hyperspectral image Denoising using local low-rank matrix recovery and global spatial–spectral Total variation. IEEE J Selected Topics Appl Earth Observ Remote Sensing 11(3):713–729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhao W, Lv Y, Liu Q, Qin B (2017) Detail-preserving image Denoising via adaptive clustering and progressive PCA thresholding. IEEE Access 6:6303–6315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Du B, Wang ZH;N A Bandwise noise model combined with low-rank matrix factorization for hyperspectral image Denoising. IEEE J Selected Topics Appl Earth Observ Remote Sensing 11(4):1070–1081

  12. Xu J, Zhang L, Zhang D (2018) External prior guided internal prior learning for real-world Noisy image Denoising. IEEE Trans Image Process 27(6):2996–3010

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhuang L, Bioucas-Dias JM (2018) Fast hyperspectral image Denoising and Inpainting based on low-rank and sparse representations. IEEE J Selected Topics Appl Earth Observ Remote Sensing 11(3):730–742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Masse A, Lefèvre S, Binet R, Artigues S, Blanchet G, Baillarin S (2018) Denoising very high resolution optical remote sensing images: application and optimization of nonlocal Bayes method. IEEE J Selected Topics Appl Earth Observ Remote Sensing 11(3):691–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Baloch G, Ozkaramanli H, Yu R (2018) Residual correlation regularization based image Denoising. IEEE Signal Proc Lett 25(2):298–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang H, Cen Y, He Z, He Z, Zhao R, Zhang F (2018) Reweighted low-rank matrix analysis with structural smoothness for image Denoising. IEEE Trans Image Process 27(4):1777–1792

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Kang SIC;S-J (2018) Geodesic path-based diffusion acceleration for image Denoising. IEEE Trans Multimed 20(7):1738–1750

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yan C, Li L, Zhang C, Liu B, Zhang Y, Dai Q (2019) Cross-modality bridging and knowledge transferring for image understanding. IEEE Trans Multimed

  19. Yan C, Xie H, Chen J, Zha Z, Hao X, Zhang Y, Dai Q (2018) A fast Uyghur text detector for complex background images. IEEE Trans Multimed 20(12):3389–3398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lakshmi B, Kavita P, Ramu K (2012) A parallel model for noise reduction of images using smoothing filters and image averaging. Ind J Comput Sci Eng (IJCSE) 2(6):837–844

    Google Scholar 

  21. Dangeti S (2003) Denoising techniques—a Comparison. Dissertion, Andhra University College of Engineering, Visakhapatnam

  22. Mohapatra S, Sa KP, Majhi B (2007) Impulsive noise removal image enhancement technique. In: 6th WSEAS international conference on circuits, systems, electronics, control and signal processing (CSECS-2007), Cairo, Egypt, pp 317–322

  23. Mccomb K et al (1993) Female lions can identify potentially infanticidal males from their roars. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 252(1333):59–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Schaller GB (1972) The Serengeti lion: a study of predator–prey relations. Wildlife behavior and ecology series. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  25. Yazdani M, Jolai F (2016) Lion optimization algorithm (LOA): a nature-inspired metaheuristic algorithm. J Comput Des Eng 3:24–36

    Google Scholar 

  26. Babers R, Hassanien AE, Ghali NI (2015) A nature-inspired metaheuristic lion optimization algorithm for community detection. 11th Int Comput Eng Conf (ICENCO), Cairo 2015:217–222. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICENCO.2015.7416351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang L, Zhang D, Mou X, Zhang D (2011) FSIM: a feature similarity index for image quality assessment. IEEE Trans Image Process 20(8):2378–2386

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Jayapal J, Ravi DS (2017) A novel Denoising algorithm based on Superpixel clustering and dictionary learning approach. Int J Intel Eng Syst 11(1):142–152

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Jayapal.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jayapal, J., Subban, R. Automated lion optimization algorithm assisted Denoising approach with multiple filters. Multimed Tools Appl 79, 4041–4056 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-019-07803-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-019-07803-x

Keywords

Navigation