[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of quantitative methods for analysis of polyphasic pharmaceuticals

  • Published:
Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Adequate very sensitive quantification methods are needed for the development and are also now required for the monitoring of undesirable solid form(s) as routine tests. The pre-requisite for quantitation are selectivity, sensitivity and most important the purity of standards and their proper storage, what is a challenge for metastable forms.

Several analytical techniques are available such as X-ray diffraction, spectroscopy, thermal analysis and microcalorimetry. The different steps of the validation of the analytical methods and problems to be solved are discussed. Examples illustrate the different techniques and compare their possible advantages and limits. The relative standard deviation of measurements should allow for checking the homogenization procedure of mixtures for calibration. The validation should be carried out following ICH guidelines for validation of analytical methods. Comparison of different techniques in adequate concentration range add confidence in the analytical results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. J. K. Haleblian and W. J. McCrone, Pharm. Sci., 58 (1969) 911.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. J. K. Haleblian, Pharm. Sci., 64 (1975) 1269.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. International Conference on Harmonization (ICH), Guideline Specification Q6A, Decision Tree: Investigating the need to set acceptance criteria for polymorphism in drug substances and drug products, 1999.

  4. Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) Process for Generic Drugs, FDA. gov.

  5. W. H. DeCamp, Amer. Pharm. Rev., 4 (2001) 70.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. L. X. Yu, M. S. Furnes, A. Raw, K. P. Woodland Outlaw, N. E. Nashed, E. Ramos, S. P. F. Miler, R. C. Adams, F. Fang, R. M. Patel, F. O. Holcombe, Y. Chiu and A. S. Hussain, Pharm. Res., 20 (2003) 531.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. S. A. Raw, M. S. Furness, D. S. Gill, R. C. Adams, F. O. Holcombe and L. Yu, Adv. Drug Del. Rev., 56 (2004) 397.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. D. Giron, Eng. Life Sci., 3 (2003) 103.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. D. Giron, S. Garnier and M. Mutz, J. Therm. Anal. Cal., 77 (2004) 709.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. A. Burger and R. Ramberger, Mikrochim. Acta, II (1979) 259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. D. Giron, Labo-Pharma-Probl. Techn., 307 (1981) 151.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Polymorphism in Pharmaceutical Solids, H. G. Brittain Ed., Marcel Dekker, New York, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Polymorphism in Molecular Crystals, J. Bernstein, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. R. Caira, Design of Organic Solids in Topics in current Chemistry, 98 (1998) 163.

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. Hilfiker, Polymorphism: in the Pharmaceutical Industry, 2006, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim.

    Google Scholar 

  16. L. Borka and J. K. Haleblian, Acta Pharm. Jugosl., 40 (1990) 71.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. D. Giron, Thermochim. Acta, 248 (1995) 1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. M. Kühnert-Branstätter, Thermomicroscopy in the Analysis of Pharmaceuticals, Pergamon, NY., 1971.

  19. M. Pudipeddi and A. T. M. Serajuddin, J. Pharm. Sci., 94 (2005) 929.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. S. R. Byrn, R. R. Pfeiffer and J. G. Stowell, Solid-State Chemistry of drugs, 2nd Ed., SSCI Inc., West Lafayette, Indiana, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  21. International harmonisation guideline Q2 on validation of analytical procedures, 1996. US29, first supplement, 3614–3617.

  22. G. A. Stephenson, The Rigaku Journal, 92 (2005) 2.

    Google Scholar 

  23. S. S. Iyengar, N. V. Phadnis and R. Suryanarayanan, Powder Diffraction, 16 (2001) 20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. R. Surana and R. Suryanarayanan, Powder Diffraction, 15 (2000) 2.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. M. Davidovich, J. Z. Gougoutas, R. P. Scaring, I. Vittez and S. Yin, Am. Pharm. Rev., 7 (2004).

  26. S. Yin, R. P. Scaring, J. DiMarco, M. Gaella and J. Z. Gougoutas, Am. Pharm. Rev., 6 (2003) 80.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. S. D. Clas, R. Faizer, R. E. O’Connor and E. B. Vadas, Int. J. Pharm., 121 (1995) 73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. D. Giron, B. Edel and P. Piechon, Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst., 187 (1990) 297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. V. B. Cooper, G. E. S. Pearce and E. R. Petts, J. Pharm. Pharmacol., 55 (2003) 1323.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. X-ray diffraction, USP 29.

  31. D. Giron, J. Therm. Anal. Cal., 64 (2001) 37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. D. Giron, J. Therm. Anal. Cal., 73 (2003) 441.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. ASTME1655-00. ’Standard Practice for IR quantitative Analysis’, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.

  34. D. E. Bugay, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev., 48 (2001) 43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. R. Helmy, G. X. Zhou, Y. W. Chen, L. Crocker, T. Wang, R. M. Wenslow and A. Vailaya, Anal. Chem., 75 (2003) 605.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. S. Agatonovic-Kustrin, T. Rades, V. Wu, D. Saville and I. G. Tucker, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal., 25 (2001) 741.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. M. Sheikhzadeh, S. Rohan, A. Jutan, T. Manifar, K. Murthy and S. Horne, Pharm. Res., 23 (2006) 1043.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. V. Koradia, G. Chawwla and A. K. Bansai, Acta Pharmaceutica, 54 (2004) 193.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Eur. Ph., 2005, 5, section 2.2.24.

  40. EMEA, Guideline for the development and Validation of NIR Methods in the Pharmaceutical Industry, N. Broad, P. Graham, P. Hailey, A. Hardy, S. Holland, S. Hughes, D. Lee, K. Prebble and N. Salton.

  41. NIR 〈119〉, USP 2006, 29, 2979–2983.

    Google Scholar 

  42. A. D. Patel, P. E. Luner and M. S. Kemper, J. Pharm. Sci., 90 (2001) 360.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. M. Otsuka, F. Kato and Y. Matsuda, Analyst, 126 (2001) 1578.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Raman 〈1120〉, USP 29 (2006) 2983. Eur. Ph., 2005, 5, section 2.02.

    Google Scholar 

  45. R. S. Campbell, N. Sarra, A. C. Williams, I. M. Grimsey and S. W. Booth, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal., 28 (2002) 1135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. L. S. Taylor, Am. Pharm. Rev., 4 (2001) 60.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. C. J. Strachan, P. F. Taday, D. A. Newnham, K. C. Gordon, J. A. Zeitler, M. Pepper and T. Rades, J. Pharm. Sci., 94 (2005) 837.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Y. Hu, H. Wikstrom, S. Byrn and L. S. Taylor, Appl. Spectroscopy, 60 (2006) 977.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. P. A. Tishmack, D. E. Bugay and S. R. Byrn, J. Pharm. Sci., 92 (2003) 441.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. M. T. Zell, B. E. Padden, D. J. W. Grant, S. A. Schroeder, K. L. Wachholder, I. Prakash and E. J. Munson, Tetrahedron, 56 (2000) 6603.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. D. C. Apperley, R. K. Harris, T. Larsson and T. Malmstrom, J. Pharm. Sci., 92 (2003) 2487.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. R. K. Harris, Analyst, 131 (2006) 351.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. USP29, 2006, 2666–2667.

  54. R. Saklatvala, P. G. Royal and D. Q. M. Craig, Int. J. Pharm., 192 (1999) 55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. M. Lappalainen, I. Pitkaenen and P. Harjunen, Int. J. Pharm., 307 (2006) 150.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. G. M. Venkatesh, M. E. Barnett, C. Owusu-Fordjour and M. Galop, Pharm. Res., 18 (2001) 98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. USP Solution calorimetry.

  58. P. Royall and S. Gaisford, Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol., 6 (2005) 215

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. M. Anberg, C. Nyström and S. Castensson, Int. J. Pharm., 81 (1992) 153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. D. Giron, P. Remy, S. Thomas and E. Vilette, J. Thermal Anal., 48 (1997) 465.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. M. Anberg, Thermochim. Acta, 248 (1995) 161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. K. Fiebich and M. Mutz, J. Therm. Anal. Cal., 57 (1999) 75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. H. Ahmed, G. Buckton and D. A. Rawlins, Int. J. Pharm., 130 (1996) 195.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. K. Kawakami, T. Numa and Y. Ida, J. Pharm. Sci., 91 (2002) 417.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. S. Garnier, D. Giron and M. Mutz, ’Study of crystallization of drug substances under solvent vapour atmosphere by microcalorimetry’, PhandTA7, Innsbruck, Sept. 2003.

  66. G. Buckton, Thermochim. Acta, 247 (1994) 117. G. Buckton and P. L. Sheridan, Pharm. Res., 12 (1995) 1025.

    Google Scholar 

  67. S. E. Hogan and G. Buckton, Int. J. Pharm., 227 (2001) 57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. S. E. Dilworth, G. Buckton, S. Gaisford and R. Ramos, Int. J. Pharm., 284 (2004) 83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. V. Lehto, M. Tenho, K. Vaehae-Heikkilae, P. Harjunen, M. Paeaellysaho, J. Vaelisaari, P. Niemelae and K. Jaervinen, Powder Technology, 167 (2006) 85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. C. Guftasson, H. Lennholm, T. Iversen and C. Nystrom, Int. J. Pharm., 174 (1998) 243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. I. Fix and K.-J. Steffens, Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm., 30 (2004) 513.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. D. Pratiwi, J. P. Fawcett, K. C. Gordon and T. Rades, Eur. J. Pharm., 54 (2002) 337.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. P. Royall, C. Huang, S. Jai Tang, J. Duncan, G. Vandevelde and M. Brown, Int. J. Pharm., 301 (2005) 181.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. T. M. Niemczyk, 2003 ’Quantitative analysis of polymorphic mixtures using infrared spectroscopy’. University of New Mexico.

  75. T. Okumura and M. Otsuka, J. Pharm.Sci., 94 (2005) 1013.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. D. Giron, Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst., 161 (1987) 77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. D. Giron, P. Piechon, C. Goldbronn and S. Pfeffer, J. Therm. Anal. Cal., 57 (1999) 61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Danielle Giron.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Giron, D., Monnier, S., Mutz, M. et al. Comparison of quantitative methods for analysis of polyphasic pharmaceuticals. J Therm Anal Calorim 89, 729–743 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-006-7962-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-006-7962-y

Keywords