[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Log in

Optimal Control of a Multistate Failure-Prone Manufacturing System under a Conditional Value-at-Risk Cost Criterion

  • Published:
Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to establish the optimality of a hedging-point control policy in a multistate Markovian failure-prone manufacturing system with a risk-averse criterion that is defined as the conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) of the steady-state instantaneous running cost, where the system is subject to a constant single-product demand rate. An explicit expression for the optimal control policy is also obtained for the two-state case. The results are important from both theoretical and practical viewpoints. Indeed, the paper extends the well-known classical theoretical result on the optimality of hedging-point control policies under risk-neutral criteria, which are typically given by long-run average costs, and it develops a flexible and practical method for incorporating risk aversion into cost criteria. The approach presented here can be used to specify optimal control policies in similar manufacturing systems with CVaR criteria.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kimemia, J., Gershwin, S.B.: An algorithm for the computer control of a flexible manufacturing system. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 15, 353–362 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Akella, R., Kumar, P.R.: Optimal control of production rate in a failure-prone manufacturing system. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 31, 116–126 (1986)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Bielecki, T.R., Kumar, P.R.: Optimality of zero-inventory policies for unreliable manufacturing systems. Oper. Res. 36, 532–541 (1988)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Sethi, S.P., Yan, H., Zhang, H., Zhang, Q.: Optimal and hierarchical controls in dynamic stochastic manufacturing systems: a survey. Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag. 4, 133–170 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang, Q.: Risk sensitive production planning of stochastic manufacturing systems: a singular perturbation approach. SIAM J. Control Optim. 33, 498–527 (1995)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Ahmadi-Javid, A., Malhamé, R.P.: Optimality of a hedging-point control policy for a failure-prone manufacturing system under a probabilistic cost criterion. In: Proceedings of 50th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, December 2011, pp. 5887–5892, Orlando, FL (2011)

  7. Artzner, Ph, Delbaen, F., Eber, J.M., Heath, D.: Coherent risk measures. Math. Finance 9, 203–228 (1999)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Ruszczyski, A., Shapiro, A.: Optimization of convex risk functions. Math. Oper. Res. 31, 433–452 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Rockafellar, R.T., Uryasev, S.: Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distributions. J. Banking Finance 26, 1443–1471 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Shapiro, A., Dentcheva, D., Ruszczynski, A.: Lectures on Stochastic Programming: Modeling and Theory. MPS/SIAM, Philadelphia, PA (2009)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Sethi, S.P., Suo, W., Taksar, M.I., Zhang, Q.: Optimal production planning in a stochastic manufacturing system with long-run average cost. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 92, 161–188 (1997)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Malhamé, R.P.: Ergodicity of hedging control policies in single-part multiple-state manufacturing systems. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 38, 340–343 (1993)

  13. Gürkan, G., Karaesmen, F., Özdemir, Ö.: Optimal threshold levels in stochastic fluid models via simulation-based optimization. Discret. Event Dyn. Syst. 17, 53–97 (2007)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Sharifnia, A.: Production control of a manufacturing system with multiple machine states. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 33, 620–625 (1988)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Liberopoulos, G., Hu, J.-Q.: On the ordering of optimal hedging points in a class of manufacturing flow control models. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 40, 282–286 (1995)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Brémaud, P., Malhamé, R.P., Massoulié, L.: A manufacturing system with general stationary failure process: Stability and IPA of hedging control policies. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 42, 155–170 (1997)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Hu, J.Q.: Production rate control for failure-prone production systems with no-backlog permitted. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 40, 291–295 (1995)

  18. Martinelli, F., Valigi, P.: Hedging point policies remain optimal under limited backlog and inventory space. Automatic Control, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 49, 1863–1871 (2004)

  19. Gershwin, S.B., Tan, B., Veatch, M.H.: Production control with backlog-dependent demand. IIE Trans. 41, 511–523 (2009)

  20. Martinelli, F.: Optimality of a two-threshold feedback control for a manufacturing system with a production dependent failure rate. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 52, 1937–1942 (2007)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amir Ahmadi-Javid.

Additional information

Communicated by James R. Luedtke.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ahmadi-Javid, A., Malhamé, R. Optimal Control of a Multistate Failure-Prone Manufacturing System under a Conditional Value-at-Risk Cost Criterion. J Optim Theory Appl 167, 716–732 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10957-014-0668-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10957-014-0668-6

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation